And Then She Killed Him (22 page)
There was one other big bit of news that same day. Tammy Eret, who was so much a part of the prosecution team, let it be known that she was leaving the DA’s office. Part of her reasoning was “My kids don’t get to do things, such as sleepovers, just because of the things I’ve seen and my position. You have to be very guarded.”
In fact, over the last few years with the DA’s office, Eret had been a big part of the prosecution team on major homicide cases, sexual assaults, and other felony crimes. All of that took its toll on the mother of four.
After Miriam Helmick’s trial was over, Eret would be moving on to be in private practice. She admitted that some of the cases she’d worked on had been “haunting.” She added that the change would be good for her and her family. Alan Helmick’s case certainly fell into the “haunting” category for Eret.
C
HAPTER 34
HAPTER 34
“A L
OVER AND A
P
LAYMATE
”
OVER AND A
P
LAYMATE
”
Miriam’s son, Chris Giles, was not comfortable being a witness in his mother’s trial, but nonetheless, he was a witness for the prosecution. Tammy Eret had Chris speak about when he had first met Alan Helmick, and that had been when Miriam and Alan got married. Chris had been on a church mission in Ecuador when Alan was murdered. Then in early July 2008, Chris flew out to Colorado and spent a few days with his mother.
About that period of time, Chris testified, “I didn’t stay at a hotel. I stayed at the residence (in Whitewater). We went to visit one of Alan’s family, just to kind of get out, on the evening of July fourth.”
Eret wanted to know if Miriam had told Chris what had happened to Alan Helmick. Chris replied, “She basically told me that Alan had been shot, and it was a home invasion. That was the gist of it. I was just kinda there to listen and help her out.”
Eret asked who had brought up the fact that Miriam might move to Florida. Chris answered, “I had discussed it with her. I said that once everything got wrapped up, she could come down and work some things out [about] what her next step would be. But I advised her that she needed to remain in Colorado and make sure everything was taken care of here f irst.”
Asked if Miriam had spoken about not having any identification, Chris responded, “She referred to everything being confiscated in the house. Her ID card and all that was taken. And she proceeded to tell me that she had copies of Sharon Helmick’s ID. I advised her that wasn’t a good course to do. It’s not right, and it’s not legal.”
Jody McGuirk was worried about this line of questioning and asked to approach the judge. The request was granted. McGuirk said to Judge Robison, “This is the point where we would like to ask for a limiting instruction in regard to the use of Sharon Helmick’s ID. It’s so that can’t be used as proof to a prior crime.”
Tammy Eret responded, “I’m not sure. I think it was okayed by you.”
All of this was because Charles Kirkpatrick was going to be called as the next witness concerning Sharon Helmick’s ID, as well as other things. Judge Robison agreed with McGuirk, and said to the jurors, “Ladies and gentlemen, certain evidence may be admitted for a particular purpose only, and for no other. You’re about to hear evidence relating to the alleged use of Sharon Helmick’s identity by Miriam Helmick. This evidence is offered for the purpose of showing motive, plan, and intent as to the charge of first-degree murder only, and you should consider it as evidence for no other purpose.”
Chris next spoke about Miriam supposedly going to somewhere around Denver to see a family friend, and the next thing he knew she was in the Southeast, possibly Savannah, Georgia, and wanted to come stay with him in Florida. According to Chris, this occurred about two weeks after he returned home from Colorado, making it mid to late July 2008.
Chris was concerned about this request by his mother, and he wanted to make sure that Miriam had cleared up all things in Colorado with the investigators concerning the death of Alan Helmick. Chris testified that Miriam told him that the investigators knew that she was going to Florida. That, in fact, was not the case.
Chris added that sometime in August or September, he received a phone call from Jim Hebenstreit. Hebenstreit asked if Chris knew where Miriam was, and Chris told Hebenstreit that she was staying with him.
Tammy Eret asked, “Did you indicate to your mother that you told Investigator Hebenstreit where she was?”
“Yes, ma’am.”
“And how did she appear to react to that?”
“She wasn’t very happy.”
“Did you know at the time that she was residing with you that she was actually using the name of Sharon Helmick?”
“I did not.”
“Did she indicate to you what she thought she would get from Alan’s estate?”
“She indicated to me, under Colorado law, that she was entitled to half of everything after they got married.”
Surprisingly, the defense had only one question to ask Chris. Jody McGuirk said, “Your mom, Miriam—she seemed happy when she was with Alan?”
Chris replied, “Yes, ma’am.”
McGuirk responded, “That’s it. No further questions.”
Charles Kirkpatrick reiterated to the prosecution what he had already told investigators about Miriam Helmick, a woman he had known as “Sharon.” He spoke of being on a singles Web site called MillionaireMatch.com. He also spoke of having a 1,800-square-foot luxury apartment in Orlando, Florida, and owning several automobiles, including a 1985 neo-classic Zimmer Golden Spirit.
As Kirkpatrick kept listing all the expensive items he owned, Jody McGuirk objected. In a sidebar, she said to Judge Robison, “I don’t see what the relevance of this testimony is. He’s already spoken about income. You’re (Tuttle) just randomly asking him how expensive some items are.”
Richard Tuttle shot back, “It’s certainly relevant to what we’re offering. It goes to show Miriam’s plan in the wake of murdering her husband, to hook up with another person with assets. And the whole relationship again belies her true love and motivation toward Alan Helmick. We’ll be laying a foundation that she actually met Kirkpatrick in his Mercedes. And they went back to his apartment, which is very nicely appointed.”
Steve Colvin chimed in, “You’re also gonna elicit that she spent time in the Golden Spirit, when she was actually in the Mercedes? How’s the value of this relevant to anything?”
Judge Robison sustained the objection, and the questioning by Tuttle moved to another area. This question concerned Miriam’s posting about herself on MillionaireMatch.com: Saw your profile and I loved it. I can dance any dance and I’m pretty good at it, too.... Your profile requirements described me completely.
Charles testified about Miriam meeting him at a T.G.I. Friday’s, where she mentioned about her former husband being deceased. Charles said, “She told me she was a widow. He had died about six to twelve months before from some type of brain disease or something, that he had been sick for three to four years prior to that.”
Tuttle asked, “Did she talk about having time over those three to four years to prepare for his death?”
The witness responded, “Yeah. She said that it wasn’t like it was a sudden thing.”
Jody McGuirk asked Kirkpatrick what his posting had been on MillionaireMatch.com. Charles answered, “It specifically read that I was looking for a lover and a playmate.”
“You were concerned that she mentioned she’d like to relocate to Orlando?”
“Yes. She mentioned it a lot of times.”
“Her asking . . . This was kind of a needy type of behavior that was a turnoff to you?”
“Yes, it was.”
“You mentioned that you lied to [Miriam] and told her that you were going to visit your grandchildren or something?”
“Yes. She had asked to stay over another day.”
“So this woman that you found needy, that you slept with . . . you then lied to her to get rid of her?”
“No, it wasn’t to get rid of her. It was because I didn’t feel comfortable with the way she approached me about staying.”
C
HAPTER 35
HAPTER 35
“I H
EAR
W
EDDING
B
ELLS
.”
EAR
W
EDDING
B
ELLS
.”
There was nothing much new in Penny Lyons’s testimony that differed from everything she had already told investigators earlier. The only real contentious part of her testimony was an objection from Steve Colvin about why Penny or Miriam did not phone the police after discovering the envelope under the front porch’s doormat.
Colvin told the judge in a sidebar, “I’m trying to object before the evidence is elicited. She’s going to talk about the fact that she did not wind up calling law enforcement because Ms. Helmick said she wanted to talk to a lawyer. I’m objecting preemptively to that evidence coming in because it’s a comment on Miriam Helmick’s Sixth and Fifth Amendment right to counsel. The evidence is being offered to show guilty knowledge because Ms. Helmick wants to talk to a lawyer. It’s our position that it’s improper to assume guilty knowledge simply from contacting an attorney.”
Tammy Eret responded, “Miriam Helmick was not in custody. This has nothing to do with law enforcement. This is a statement that she made to a third party. It does show guilty knowledge. None of her rights are in play—because law enforcement is not involved.”
Judge Robison overruled the objection, and Eret asked Penny Lyons, “Did you call 911?”
Penny responded, “I started to call, and Miriam asked me not to.”
“Did she tell you why?”
“She said, ‘Penny, please don’t second-guess me now. Please call my attorney.’ So I called her attorney.”
Later in the questioning, Eret asked, “You were a good friend of hers?”
Penny replied, “I felt that I was, yes.”
On cross-examination, Steve Colvin got to this subject of friendship. He asked Penny, “Fair to say that you feel as to the card that you found, and Ms. Helmick’s behavior when the card was found and afterward, that you feel like your friendship was taken advantage of ?”
Penny answered, “That would be true, yes.”
Colvin continued, “Assuming that she took advantage of your friendship as to the card, that doesn’t mean that she took advantage of your friendship as to her not having any money. Is that fair?”
“I never had an issue with giving her the money.”
“And she really didn’t have any financial resources at that point. Is that correct?”
“No, she did not.”
“It really did appear that she lost everything when Alan was murdered?”
“That was my perception, yes.”
Not unlike Penny Lyons, the tougher questions for Laegan McGee came during cross-examination. Steve Colvin asked her if she saw Miriam sitting and holding hands at one point with Alan Helmick. The witness said that she did. Then Colvin asked, “You thought she made an apology wave to you?” Laegan said that was correct.
So Colvin wanted to know if the witness thought Miriam at Boomers had something to apologize about. She answered, “She looked embarrassed.”
Colvin continued, “You made a point of mentioning she’d had someone who’d been a boyfriend previously four weeks before. You made a point of mentioning that you thought this was pretty fast. Sound like you don’t think it was appropriate that she held hands with Mr. Helmick.”
“No, I felt that Miriam felt embarrassed, and that was how she felt. But I don’t know what was in her head.”
“And she said on that day, ‘I hear wedding bells,’ in a singsongy voice. So she clearly thought this relationship was leading somewhere serious?”
“Yes.”
The testimony of Jeri Yarbrough, who had sold horses to Miriam Helmick and then bought the same horses back, basically followed the things that she had told investigators. One section of Jeri’s testimony did bring an objection from Jody McGuirk.
Tammy Eret had just asked Jeri, “Did Miriam talk to you about whether or not she was nervous about the interview with law enforcement?” (The prosecutor was alluding to the June 10 interview.)
Jeri replied, “She didn’t say that she was nervous. She said that she had been down that road before.”
McGuirk objected immediately, and there was a conference at the judge’s bench. McGuirk told Judge Robison that specific area had already been ruled as inadmissible for the jury to hear.
Eret countered, “The Delta incident, when she was questioned by law enforcement—that has not been excluded, and that is what she (Jeri Yarbrough) will talk about. I mean, what other things would she be talking about?”
McGuirk said, “Well, from discovery, it seems like she made that comment in reference to other things.” (The other things probably related to the death of Miriam’s first husband, Jack Giles, and that was off-limits.)
It was finally determined that Jeri could talk about the Delta car fire incident and not the death of Jack Giles.
On cross-examination, Steve Colvin had Jeri Yarbrough agree that she’d probably had fifteen separate conversations with Miriam Helmick before she left Colorado on July 15. And of those conversations, it was hard for Jeri to pin down when certain things had been spoken by Miriam to her over the phone.
Colvin said, “You don’t have a word-for-word memory of what happened in each conversation, correct?” Jeri said that was so.
And Colvin wanted to get to an important point. The point was that Jeri Yarbrough might have acted differently than Miriam did when she first discovered Alan on the kitchen floor. Colvin said, “You had a pretty crazy conversation on Thursday night, two days after the murder. Crazy enough that when you get the phone conversation, you’re thinking to yourself, that’s not how I would behave if my husband was killed, right?”
Jeri answered, “That’s correct.”
“That had to be concerning to you, didn’t it?”
“Very concerning.”
“In fact, you’re thinking to yourself, this lady’s husband got killed, and she’s not even upset about it, right?”
“I was shocked that she had called me and was being so frank, and stuff.”
“Ms. Yarbrough, in testimony you just described it as suspicious. Was it suspicious?”
“It’s suspicious, yeah. You’re taken aback by it. It didn’t put her in a good light.”
“So you have suspicious conversations with someone regarding a first-degree murder and you immediately call law enforcement to report your suspicions, didn’t you?”
“No, I did not.”
“You did not call law enforcement. In fact, you never talked to law enforcement until they called you, correct?”
“That’s correct.”
And then Colvin got to the part where Miriam had supposedly laughed after relating that a tank filled with gas would not explode. Colvin asked, “Was it kind of a sinister, evil-person, movie laugh?”
“ No.”
“What kind of laugh?”
“Just kind of like, ‘I didn’t know a car wouldn’t blow up’ laugh. Not a sinister, movie laugh.”
“Okay, so you took that statement as a confession that she tried to murder her husband by blowing up his car?”
“ No.”
“You didn’t take it as that, because clearly that’s not how she intended it, right?”
“Right.”
“But you didn’t make clear to law enforcement—‘By the way, I didn’t think she was trying to confess to a murder’?”
“They didn’t ask me that question. I don’t know what they assumed. That’s up to the police what their thought processes are, not mine.”
“And Miriam Helmick clearly expressed to you that they (law enforcement) were looking at her to the exclusion of anybody else. Isn’t that true?”
“She thought she was the prime suspect, yes.”
“She thought she was their only suspect, didn’t she?”
“She said
prime
suspect. That’s what she told me.”
prime
suspect. That’s what she told me.”
Other books
Killing Chase by Ben Muse
Accidental Love by Lacey Wolfe
RIDE (A Stone Kings Motorcycle Club Romance) by Daphne Loveling
DangeroustoKnow by Lily Harlem
Taken: A One to Take Primer by Tia Louise
Two for the Dough by Janet Evanovich
Sleeper by Jo Walton
Never Say Never by Kelly Mooney
Literally Murder (A Black Cat Bookshop Mystery) by Ali Brandon
The Honeymoon Sisters by Gwyneth Rees