Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800 (5 page)
Read Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800 Online
Authors: Khaled El-Rouayheb
BOOK: Before Homosexuality in the Arab-Islamic World, 1500-1800
5.67Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
The confusion resulting from the assumption that
lūṭī
translates as “homosexual” may be seen, for example, in a modern discussion of the collection of erotic anecdotes entitled
Nuzhat al-albāb fīmā lā yūjad fī kitāb
by the Egyptian scholar Ahmad al-Tīfāshī (d. 1253). Having apparently been misled by a French translation, Robert Irwin asserts, in his absorbing and rewarding book
The Arabian Nights: A Companion,
that the sixth chapter of Tīfāshīʾs work deals with homosexuals, and goes on to give the “characteristic features” attributed to them:
lūṭī
translates as “homosexual” may be seen, for example, in a modern discussion of the collection of erotic anecdotes entitled
Nuzhat al-albāb fīmā lā yūjad fī kitāb
by the Egyptian scholar Ahmad al-Tīfāshī (d. 1253). Having apparently been misled by a French translation, Robert Irwin asserts, in his absorbing and rewarding book
The Arabian Nights: A Companion,
that the sixth chapter of Tīfāshīʾs work deals with homosexuals, and goes on to give the “characteristic features” attributed to them:
The homosexual should have a pleasant lodging, well-furnished with books and wine, and made pleasanter yet by the presence of doves and singing birds. A homosexual can be recognized by the way he stares directly at one, this direct gaze often being followed by a wink. The typical homosexual has thin legs with hairy ankles and tends to wear robes which reach right down to the ground. When he walks, his hands and his legs sway.
25
Chapters 6-8 of al-Tīfāshīʾs book are in fact devoted to
al-lāṭā
(plural of
lūṭī
) and
al-murd al-muʾājirīn.
Even a cursory reading of the Arabic text (to which Irwin did not have access) reveals that the former term refers to adult men who desire to sodomize boys—that is, to “pederasts” rather than “homosexuals” —while the term
murd muʾājirīn
refers to beardless boy prostitutes who render sexual services to
al-lāṭā.
The quoted account of “characteristic features” runs these two categories together: it is the pederast who should have pleasant lodgings, books and wine, but it is the boy prostitute who may be recognized by his gaze, his legs, and the way he walks.
26
What is even more damaging to the assumption that the term
lūṭī
is synonymous with “homosexual” is the fact that a later chapter of Tīfāshīʾs work (chapter 12) deals with
al-khināth—
that is, effeminate adult men who desire to be sodomized by (preferably very masculine) men. This category is clearly treated by the author as distinct from the previously mentioned
lāṭā
and
muʾājirīn
(the latter are beardless boys and their motives are depicted as pecuniary). It should be clear by now that the modern term “homosexual” hopelessly muddles certain native distinctions, and that insisting on using it in translation or paraphrase leads to serious misunderstanding.
27
It is also clear that Tīfāshīʾ-s work cannot be invoked, as Irwin does, in support of the idea that some medieval Arabs thought of homosexuality as a “single condition” shared by those who prefer the active role and those who prefer the passive, nor of the idea that this single condition was considered by some to be “a form of illness.” There does not seem to be any support at all for the idea that pederasts were thought to suffer from an illness. One may admittedly encounter a few passages in which
liwāṭ
was called a
dāʾ
, and the latter term may in appropriate contexts mean “disease.” However, the term
dāʾ
was frequently used in a loose sense to cover any habit or character trait that was held to be reprehensible. The very passages or works that use the term
dāʾ
of
liwāṭ
also use it, for example, of stinginess (
bukhl
) or ignorance of religious stipulations (
jahl
).
28
There were no medical discussions of
liwāṭ
or any other indication that a tendency to commit
liwāṭ
was held to be a disease in the strict sense, with a physiological basis, physical symptoms, and natural remedies.
29
The
lūṭī
was instead widely represented as a morally dissolute person, a libertine (
fāsiq
), and this latter word was sometimes used as its synonym. Being a pederast was of ten spoken of in the same breath as being a drinker of wine: “he is suspected of drinking wine and being inclined to beardless boys”; “[he] loves boys and drink”; “he became famous for drinking wine and loving boys”; “both of them are unscrupulous wine-drinkers and rakes, well known for their carousing, and famous among rich and poor for kissing fair boys and fair girls.”
30
As in the case of drinking alcohol, the antidote to pederasty was repentance. A story in a collection of humorous anecdotes, perhaps dating from the seventeenth century, started thus: “It was related that one of the
lūṭīs
repented (
tāba
) from sodomy (
liwāṭ
)
.”
31
In the romance of Baybars, men who make sexual advances to the young hero and his groom ʿUthmān are regularly beaten up until they say: “I repent at your hands, and swear by your head and eyes that I will no longer meet youngsters and commit
liwāṭ,”
or, “My master! I repent and recant for what I did, and regret and repent at your hands from this time on, and if I should revert to anything of the kind then kill me.”
32
The following couplet by the poet Mamayah al-Rūmī also illustrates the tendency to assimilate pederasty to sins such as (heterosexual) fornication and drinking alcohol:
al-lāṭā
(plural of
lūṭī
) and
al-murd al-muʾājirīn.
Even a cursory reading of the Arabic text (to which Irwin did not have access) reveals that the former term refers to adult men who desire to sodomize boys—that is, to “pederasts” rather than “homosexuals” —while the term
murd muʾājirīn
refers to beardless boy prostitutes who render sexual services to
al-lāṭā.
The quoted account of “characteristic features” runs these two categories together: it is the pederast who should have pleasant lodgings, books and wine, but it is the boy prostitute who may be recognized by his gaze, his legs, and the way he walks.
26
What is even more damaging to the assumption that the term
lūṭī
is synonymous with “homosexual” is the fact that a later chapter of Tīfāshīʾs work (chapter 12) deals with
al-khināth—
that is, effeminate adult men who desire to be sodomized by (preferably very masculine) men. This category is clearly treated by the author as distinct from the previously mentioned
lāṭā
and
muʾājirīn
(the latter are beardless boys and their motives are depicted as pecuniary). It should be clear by now that the modern term “homosexual” hopelessly muddles certain native distinctions, and that insisting on using it in translation or paraphrase leads to serious misunderstanding.
27
It is also clear that Tīfāshīʾ-s work cannot be invoked, as Irwin does, in support of the idea that some medieval Arabs thought of homosexuality as a “single condition” shared by those who prefer the active role and those who prefer the passive, nor of the idea that this single condition was considered by some to be “a form of illness.” There does not seem to be any support at all for the idea that pederasts were thought to suffer from an illness. One may admittedly encounter a few passages in which
liwāṭ
was called a
dāʾ
, and the latter term may in appropriate contexts mean “disease.” However, the term
dāʾ
was frequently used in a loose sense to cover any habit or character trait that was held to be reprehensible. The very passages or works that use the term
dāʾ
of
liwāṭ
also use it, for example, of stinginess (
bukhl
) or ignorance of religious stipulations (
jahl
).
28
There were no medical discussions of
liwāṭ
or any other indication that a tendency to commit
liwāṭ
was held to be a disease in the strict sense, with a physiological basis, physical symptoms, and natural remedies.
29
The
lūṭī
was instead widely represented as a morally dissolute person, a libertine (
fāsiq
), and this latter word was sometimes used as its synonym. Being a pederast was of ten spoken of in the same breath as being a drinker of wine: “he is suspected of drinking wine and being inclined to beardless boys”; “[he] loves boys and drink”; “he became famous for drinking wine and loving boys”; “both of them are unscrupulous wine-drinkers and rakes, well known for their carousing, and famous among rich and poor for kissing fair boys and fair girls.”
30
As in the case of drinking alcohol, the antidote to pederasty was repentance. A story in a collection of humorous anecdotes, perhaps dating from the seventeenth century, started thus: “It was related that one of the
lūṭīs
repented (
tāba
) from sodomy (
liwāṭ
)
.”
31
In the romance of Baybars, men who make sexual advances to the young hero and his groom ʿUthmān are regularly beaten up until they say: “I repent at your hands, and swear by your head and eyes that I will no longer meet youngsters and commit
liwāṭ,”
or, “My master! I repent and recant for what I did, and regret and repent at your hands from this time on, and if I should revert to anything of the kind then kill me.”
32
The following couplet by the poet Mamayah al-Rūmī also illustrates the tendency to assimilate pederasty to sins such as (heterosexual) fornication and drinking alcohol:
My career in pursuit of fancy is ruined, so have mercy on me, O Bestower and Benefactor!I’ve lost this world and the next, on fornication, booze, and beardless boys in my time.
33
It was the
ma
ʾ
būn
or
mukhannath
who was viewed as a pathological case. The Arabic medical tradition, following the Greek, tended to regard the male who desires to be anally penetrated as being afflicted with a disease—
ubnah—
at least from the time of Abū Bakr al-Rāzī (d. ca. 925), and this continued to be the verdict of the medical treatises of the early Ottoman period.
34
Ubnah
was classified as a disease with prescribed remedies in the medical works of ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī (d. 1565), Dāwūd al-Anṭākī (d. 1599), and Aḥmad al-Qalyūbī (d. 1658).
35
Of the three, only Anṭākī discussed the etiology of the disease. He considered it to be caused by the presence of a boric substance (
maddāh būrāqiyyah)
in the veins of the rectum, which burns and tickles the anus until it becomes like an itching wound, inducing the person with the disease to seek to have his anus penetrated. Though usually inherited (
mawruth
) the disease could also be caused by being subjected to penetration, since the anal itch could be the effect of especially pungent semen. The person with
ubnah
was most often effeminate, and typically suffered from flabbiness, cough, a dull, languid look, dried lips, a fleshy face, and a large posterior. As a remedy, Anṭākī mentioned liquid potions of lapis lazuli, agaric, aloe, mastic, or clove with yogurt, all of which supposedly counteract pungent humors. He also suggested the efficacy of rubbing the anus with ash obtained by burning hair from the right thigh of a hyena.
36
ma
ʾ
būn
or
mukhannath
who was viewed as a pathological case. The Arabic medical tradition, following the Greek, tended to regard the male who desires to be anally penetrated as being afflicted with a disease—
ubnah—
at least from the time of Abū Bakr al-Rāzī (d. ca. 925), and this continued to be the verdict of the medical treatises of the early Ottoman period.
34
Ubnah
was classified as a disease with prescribed remedies in the medical works of ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Shaʿrānī (d. 1565), Dāwūd al-Anṭākī (d. 1599), and Aḥmad al-Qalyūbī (d. 1658).
35
Of the three, only Anṭākī discussed the etiology of the disease. He considered it to be caused by the presence of a boric substance (
maddāh būrāqiyyah)
in the veins of the rectum, which burns and tickles the anus until it becomes like an itching wound, inducing the person with the disease to seek to have his anus penetrated. Though usually inherited (
mawruth
) the disease could also be caused by being subjected to penetration, since the anal itch could be the effect of especially pungent semen. The person with
ubnah
was most often effeminate, and typically suffered from flabbiness, cough, a dull, languid look, dried lips, a fleshy face, and a large posterior. As a remedy, Anṭākī mentioned liquid potions of lapis lazuli, agaric, aloe, mastic, or clove with yogurt, all of which supposedly counteract pungent humors. He also suggested the efficacy of rubbing the anus with ash obtained by burning hair from the right thigh of a hyena.
36
Even outside a strictly medical context, the desire of the passive sodomite was perceived as anomalous and as requiring a special explanation, for example in terms of a worm-infected anus.
37
Of course, the fact that passive sodomy was widely regarded as disease-induced did not imply that it ceased to be judged as morally and religiously reprehensible. However, it was not simply a sin that in principle anyone could commit—like, say, drinking alcohol or stealing.
Ubnah
was something a
ma’būn
had or suffered from, whereas
liwāṭ
was simply something a
Lūṭī
did. The difference is strikingly illustrated in jurists’ discussion of insults that qualify as formal accusations of illicit sexual intercourse. Calling a man a
Lūṭī
always qualified as such an accusation, but in the case of calling someone a
ma’būn
opinions were less uniform. The Egyptian jurist Manṣūr al-Buhūtī (d. 1641), for example, asserted that the latter insult did not qualify as an accusation of illicit sexual intercourse, since it referred to a condition of the insulted person and did not explicitly claim that he acted in accordance with it
(al-ubnah al-mushār ilayhā lā tu’tī annahu yaf‛al bi-muqtaḍāhā).
38
37
Of course, the fact that passive sodomy was widely regarded as disease-induced did not imply that it ceased to be judged as morally and religiously reprehensible. However, it was not simply a sin that in principle anyone could commit—like, say, drinking alcohol or stealing.
Ubnah
was something a
ma’būn
had or suffered from, whereas
liwāṭ
was simply something a
Lūṭī
did. The difference is strikingly illustrated in jurists’ discussion of insults that qualify as formal accusations of illicit sexual intercourse. Calling a man a
Lūṭī
always qualified as such an accusation, but in the case of calling someone a
ma’būn
opinions were less uniform. The Egyptian jurist Manṣūr al-Buhūtī (d. 1641), for example, asserted that the latter insult did not qualify as an accusation of illicit sexual intercourse, since it referred to a condition of the insulted person and did not explicitly claim that he acted in accordance with it
(al-ubnah al-mushār ilayhā lā tu’tī annahu yaf‛al bi-muqtaḍāhā).
38
The concept of
liwāṭ
was thus to a large extent “behavioristic,” whereas
ubnah
was more likely to be seen as an inner condition that gave rise to, and hence explained, peculiar behavior.
Ubnah
was a pathological or abnormal state which, permanently or recurrently, overwhelmed the person afflicted: “I would see him drink alcohol until he was intoxicated ... and his
ubnah
would be aroused and he would remain restless until he would be done in his anus”; “I heard of a person of honorable status who was afflicted with the disease of
ubnah,
so, fearing that this would be divulged... he had a piece of wood in the shape of a penis made, and when the disease would be roused he would seclude himself... and lock the doors from fear of being discovered and treat himself with the wood... [afterwards] he would implore of God ... that this disease would cease.”
39
At least during the phase in which his disease is active, the
ma’būn
was seen as being thoroughly saturated with his deviant sexual preference, and he was typically portrayed in the works of bawdy comedy
(mujūn)
as insatiable and indiscriminately promiscuous (except perhaps for his preference for virile and well-endowed men).
40
Such a stock association is reiterated in a defamatory poem composed by the Damascene poet ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Khāl (d. 1715) of a contemporary whom he accused of being a passive sodomite (‘
ilq
):
liwāṭ
was thus to a large extent “behavioristic,” whereas
ubnah
was more likely to be seen as an inner condition that gave rise to, and hence explained, peculiar behavior.
Ubnah
was a pathological or abnormal state which, permanently or recurrently, overwhelmed the person afflicted: “I would see him drink alcohol until he was intoxicated ... and his
ubnah
would be aroused and he would remain restless until he would be done in his anus”; “I heard of a person of honorable status who was afflicted with the disease of
ubnah,
so, fearing that this would be divulged... he had a piece of wood in the shape of a penis made, and when the disease would be roused he would seclude himself... and lock the doors from fear of being discovered and treat himself with the wood... [afterwards] he would implore of God ... that this disease would cease.”
39
At least during the phase in which his disease is active, the
ma’būn
was seen as being thoroughly saturated with his deviant sexual preference, and he was typically portrayed in the works of bawdy comedy
(mujūn)
as insatiable and indiscriminately promiscuous (except perhaps for his preference for virile and well-endowed men).
40
Such a stock association is reiterated in a defamatory poem composed by the Damascene poet ‘Abd al-Hayy al-Khāl (d. 1715) of a contemporary whom he accused of being a passive sodomite (‘
ilq
):
You of wide and generous posterior—and how many marks have we left on it! You who, if a penis appears in the Hijaz and the land of Rāmah,Cries and wails, saying, “I am tired of my residence [in Damascus].”Or if he smells a penis in al-Yamāmah says: “By God, to al-Yamāmah!”He prefers to everlasting bliss with wine [in paradise],A penis as the neck of a camel and as long as the legs of an ostrich.If the pricks that he has used to quench his cravings were put end to end,And he mounted them, he would reach the sky, and truly exceed the stars in stature.
41
A common insult (attested for sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Damascus, seventeenth-century Cairo, and seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Mosul) which denigrated the passive male sodomite, and associated him with a ravenous sexual appetite, is the term
wasīʿ,
or “wide [- arsed].”
42
wasīʿ,
or “wide [- arsed].”
42
The mentioned differences in the stereotypes of the
Lūṭī
and the
ma ʾbūn
seem to be related to the fact that only the latter was perceived as being at odds with the ideal of masculinity. Effeminacy was not a part of the image of the
Lūṭī.
Soldiers, for instance, had a reputation for being active sodomites.
43
The
Sakbāns,
mercenary soldiers who roamed the Syrian countryside in the early seventeenth century, were according to a contemporary source notorious pederasts and took many boys captive when they looted the suburbs of Damascus in 1606, as did the Egyptian troops of Muhammad Bey Abū al-Dhahab after their sacking of Jaffa in 1775.
44
The Ottoman historian and belletrist Muṣṭafa ʿAlī (d. 1600), who visited Egypt in 1599, held that a large proportion of the cavalrymen
(jundīs)
there were pederasts.
45
According to the above-mentioned poet Mamayah al-Rūmī:
Lūṭī
and the
ma ʾbūn
seem to be related to the fact that only the latter was perceived as being at odds with the ideal of masculinity. Effeminacy was not a part of the image of the
Lūṭī.
Soldiers, for instance, had a reputation for being active sodomites.
43
The
Sakbāns,
mercenary soldiers who roamed the Syrian countryside in the early seventeenth century, were according to a contemporary source notorious pederasts and took many boys captive when they looted the suburbs of Damascus in 1606, as did the Egyptian troops of Muhammad Bey Abū al-Dhahab after their sacking of Jaffa in 1775.
44
The Ottoman historian and belletrist Muṣṭafa ʿAlī (d. 1600), who visited Egypt in 1599, held that a large proportion of the cavalrymen
(jundīs)
there were pederasts.
45
According to the above-mentioned poet Mamayah al-Rūmī:
The art of
liwāṭ
is the way of masculinity
(fuḥūliyyah),
and might (
ʿizz
), so leave to Majnūn Laylah, and with Kuthayyir ʿAzz[ah],And go up to every handsome beardless boy, strip him, and, even if he cries, present him with your prick and fuck him by force.
46
Liwāṭ
was simply one of the temptations to which a man was exposed. On the other hand, a preference for the passive-receptive role in sexual intercourse was seen as the very antithesis of masculinity. A common synonym for
maʾbūn
was
mukhannath,
an effeminate man. The two terms were, to be sure, not perfect synonyms. A person suffering from
ubnah
could hide this fact and thus not behave in a way likely to be considered effeminate by his peers. It was also recognized that it was possible to be outwardly effeminate without being a passive sodomite. However, it seems misguided to expect a strictly literal use of what were, after all, very derogatory epithets. That the two terms were usually used interchangeably is clear from the bawdy-erotic literature, and is also confirmed by jurists of the period who discussed insults that qualify as formal accusations of illicit sexual intercourse. The Egyptian scholar Ahmad al-Dardīr (d. 1786), for example, asserted that someone who calls a man a
mukhannath
has made such an accusation, and is thus bound to substantiate his claim or face punishment for slander. This is so, wrote Dardīr, even if the person swears that he only intended the strict lexical meaning of the term, because according to the prevalent norm
(ʿurf),
the term
mukhannath
was used of the passive sodomite.
47
The Damascene jurist ‘Ala’ al-Dīn Muhammad al-Haskaf ī (d. 1677) also explicated the term
mukhannath
as “he who is penetrated like a woman”
(man yuʾtā ka-al-marʾah)
.
48
was simply one of the temptations to which a man was exposed. On the other hand, a preference for the passive-receptive role in sexual intercourse was seen as the very antithesis of masculinity. A common synonym for
maʾbūn
was
mukhannath,
an effeminate man. The two terms were, to be sure, not perfect synonyms. A person suffering from
ubnah
could hide this fact and thus not behave in a way likely to be considered effeminate by his peers. It was also recognized that it was possible to be outwardly effeminate without being a passive sodomite. However, it seems misguided to expect a strictly literal use of what were, after all, very derogatory epithets. That the two terms were usually used interchangeably is clear from the bawdy-erotic literature, and is also confirmed by jurists of the period who discussed insults that qualify as formal accusations of illicit sexual intercourse. The Egyptian scholar Ahmad al-Dardīr (d. 1786), for example, asserted that someone who calls a man a
mukhannath
has made such an accusation, and is thus bound to substantiate his claim or face punishment for slander. This is so, wrote Dardīr, even if the person swears that he only intended the strict lexical meaning of the term, because according to the prevalent norm
(ʿurf),
the term
mukhannath
was used of the passive sodomite.
47
The Damascene jurist ‘Ala’ al-Dīn Muhammad al-Haskaf ī (d. 1677) also explicated the term
mukhannath
as “he who is penetrated like a woman”
(man yuʾtā ka-al-marʾah)
.
48
Other books
Not to be Taken by Anthony Berkeley
Azabache by Alberto Vázquez-Figueroa
Healing Dr. Fortune by Judy Duarte
Amber Alert (Amber Alert Series Book 1) by Sara Schoen
Almost Matched (Almost Bad Boys) by Peart, A.O.
Kiss of the Dragon by Nicola Claire
Life Beyond Measure by Sidney Poitier
Ameera, Unveiled by Kathleen Varn
The Legacy by Katherine Webb
In the Time of Greenbloom by Gabriel Fielding