Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain (21 page)

Read Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain Online

Authors: Matthew Carr

Tags: #History, #Europe, #Spain & Portugal, #Religion, #Christianity, #General, #Christian Church, #Social Science, #Emigration & Immigration, #Discrimination & Race Relations, #Islamic Studies

BOOK: Blood and Faith: The Purging of Muslim Spain
8.05Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
Read aloud at family gatherings and clandestine meetings, these tales of faith, endurance, and ultimate deliverance undoubtedly brought consolation and hope to their audiences, but they were also a means of holding on to an Islamic past that had largely vanished from the surface of Spanish life. This sense of living in a vanishing world was given poignant expression by the anonymous author known as the Young Man of Arévalo, whom we have already encountered in Granada. Little is known of him except that he came from the Castilian town of Arévalo and his mother appears to have been a genuine Christian convert. He lived and wrote in the first half of the sixteenth century and traveled extensively around Spain, in what appears to have been both a spiritual quest and a pilgrimage in search of the lost Islamic heritage of al-Andalus.
The Young Man’s accounts of these journeys contain some telling glimpses of the Morisco underground, with its clandestine religious gatherings and anguished theological discussions on whether their improvised forms of worship will be sufficient to bring salvation. It is the world of heroic
magas
(wise-women) such as the indomitable Mora of Ubeda whom the Young Man meets in his journey to Granada in the early years of the century. Nearly a hundred years old and virtually blind, barely able to kneel to say her prayers, the impoverished Mora remains a figure of religious authority in her community, and her resilience clearly impresses and inspires her youthful visitor:
Granada and all the country round were governed by this Mora. She never married and was said never to have known any man. The ordinary people of the region said that this Mora had more credit in matters of our religion and sunna than anybody.... She was well known by all nations, because she showed me letters from all four of the legal schools, besides others from great muftis and scholars. She never allowed herself rest because she said that the highest form of jihad is to propound our Religion in lands not ruled by Muslims.
9
 
In Zaragoza, the Young Man describes a clandestine meeting of “honored Muslims,” who give him alms to help him undertake the hajj to Mecca. After evening prayer, some of these scholars comment on “how much our religion had fallen into neglect” and ask him to write a
tafsira
(commentary) on the Koran. The Young Man accepts the commission, closing his account of the meeting with the following invocation:
Let no man lose his faith, for Allah created us out of even less, and we are His. Let us hope for his divine mercy, which is even greater than all created things put together, for if, as a result of our sins, we are suffering now, a time will come when, out of his ineffable love, He will grant us the favor of burying the state of the unbelievers, and of restoring the throne of Islam, to the benefit of the Muslims of this peninsula. So let us not cease to call on Him, for he has promised to us more than He has yet given, mighty and powerful as He is.
10
 
This vocation “to serve Allah and to be of service to every Muslim” was a dangerous calling, since Muslims who actively proselytized Islam could always expect harsher treatment from the Inquisition than those arrested for everyday transgressions. History does not record his fate, but the Young Man’s fervent hope in a resurgent Islam was undoubtedly shared by many Moriscos. Some regarded their oppression in Spain as a test of their faith; others, just as Christians had once done before them, interpreted the triumph of their enemies as a punishment for their immorality and lack of faith. There were also those who took consolation from
aljamiado
prophetic texts known as
jofores
, which predicted that Spain’s Muslims would have to endure suffering before they were finally liberated. Some of these prophecies predicted that Turkish or North African armies would invade Spain during propitious years in the astrological calendar, and there were Moriscos who saw confirmation of these predictions in the Turkish military and naval successes during the first half of the century. Others echoed the millenarian predictions found in Christian prophetic texts of the period and foretold that a new Islamic conquest of Spain would be followed by the universal triumph of Islam.
 
It is impossible to know how many Moriscos lived these “parallel lives” in the aftermath of their conversions, but not all Spain’s former Muslims were engaging in
taqqiya
or dreaming of their imminent liberation. There were genuine Muslim converts to Christianity, such as Juan Andrés, a former Valencian
alfaqui
who converted in 1487 and became a priest, and the Granadan Jesuit Juan Albotodo. There were former members of the Nasrid aristocracy in Granada, such as the Venegas and Zegrí families, who achieved high positions in the Christian administration after the conquest. Some of these nobles acted as intermediaries between Christian and Morisco Granada, such as Francisco Núñez Muley, a former page to Archbishop Talavera, who loyally served the Christian administration yet retained the honorific title Muley (a respectful term generally given to members of the nobility, from the Arabic word
maula
) as an indication of his continued high status in the Morisco community.
There were also Granadan Moriscos who rose from relatively humble beginnings to prestigious positions in Christian society, such as Miguel de Luna and Alonso del Castillo, both of whom graduated in medicine from the newly created University of Granada. The son of Morisco converts to Christianity, del Castillo became an Arabic translator, working first for the Granada city council and then the Inquisition. He went on to become the official translator for Philip II and was given the task, together with Miguel de Luna, of cataloguing the collection of Arabic manuscripts in the Escorial palace. Elsewhere in Spain there were Moriscos such as the Zauzala family from Pina del Ebro, in Aragon, whose members served in the local Christian administration over successive generations and accumulated substantial holdings of land and cattle. Such was the wealth of the Zauzalas that when one member of the family was sentenced to death for murder and robbery in 1532, his family offered to feed the entire town “with all it could eat for a year” in exchange for an acquittal from the local seigneur—an offer that was nevertheless turned down.
11
In the city of Ávila, in Castile, there were wealthy Moriscos who enjoyed voting rights on the municipal council and served in the local militia. Further down the social scale, in the Jiloca Valley in lower Aragon, Morisco peasants regularly brought their children to be baptized in church and even called for priests to administer extreme unction to their dying relatives. In Granada in 1550, Christians and Moriscos both turned out to mourn the death of a local saint known as John of God, the founder of a public hospital for the poor, whose patients and volunteer staff included both Old Christians and Moriscos, and one local observer described how “all who came, even the Moriscos, cried and spoke of his great charity.”
12
At Málaga, Moriscos danced a
zambra
to celebrate Charles’s sacking of Tunis—with authorization from the local authorities.
In May 1539, Charles’s beloved wife, Isabella, died of fever during childbirth, and her putrefying corpse was taken to Granada to be buried in the royal chapel. This was the same queen who had issued a series of repressive anti-Morisco edicts nearly a decade before. But when her cortege arrived in the city, thousands of Moriscos joined the grieving crowds, including three thousand Morisca women, who waved their white
almalafas
above their heads alongside the colored pennants of the Christian craft guilds and “shrieked and tore at their hair and ripped their cloaks,” according to one astonished Christian observer. We cannot know how many of these Moriscas were secretly practicing Muslims, but their Islamic cultural identity clearly did not conflict with their political loyalty to a Christian sovereign.
There were other indications from other parts of Spain that Moriscos were able to make a similar distinction. It is tempting to wonder what might have happened had the authorities allowed the more discontented Moriscos to leave the country in the first place, as they had done with the Jews, and pursued a more benign program of evangelization. Would the remainder have constituted a permament ethnic and cultural minority within a Christian state? Or would their religious loyalties—and their culture and traditions—eventually have withered away, as they were already beginning to do in some parts of the country?
These questions are purely speculative, but they are worth asking, if only to remind ourselves that there were other possible courses of action available to Spain’s rulers than the ones that were actually taken. There was, of course, another alternative, which may seem obvious to a modern world that has become accustomed to the concept of a secular and religiously neutral state based on freedom of conscience as a right of all its citizens. Religious tolerance was not an unknown concept in the sixteenth century. In the Ottoman Empire, non-Muslim religious congregations were organized into administrative units known as
millets
, whose members were allowed religious autonomy and a certain degree of political, civil, and educational jurisdiction over their own communities in an arrangement that parelleled the Koranic
dhimma
model. Jews, Greek Orthodox, and Armenian-Georgian ecclesiastical communities within the sprawling multireligious and multicultural Ottoman Empire were all incorporated into the
millet
system. In the Greek city of Salonika, Jewish, Greek Orthodox, and Muslim communities all had their own separate representatives to mediate with the central government in Constantinople. Throughout the empire, members of all denominations fought in the sultan’s armies. In 1608 a special envoy of the Austrian Hapsburg monarchy passing through Ottoman-controlled Belgrade found a mixed population of Muslims, Jews, Gypsies, Orthodox Christians, and even Franciscan friars who celebrated mass in a local church.
In India, the Mughal emperor Akbar granted similar autonomy to Hindus and Portuguese Christians. Akbar’s commitment to religious pluralism was such that he allowed Jesuit missionaries into India and even permitted them to educate one of his sons. All this was very different from Europe, whose rulers were reluctant to allow freedom of conscience even to Christians with opposing religious views. Yet even in the midst of the fierce struggle between Protestant and Catholic Europe, there were periods of temporary coexistence. In 1562 Catherine de Medici enacted the Edict of Saint-Germain, which briefly ended the persecution of the Huguenots in France, before the massacre of Saint Bartholomew’s Day unleashed the first of the French Wars of Religion. In 1598 these wars were brought to an end by the promulgation of the Edict of Nantes by Henry IV, which granted limited civil rights to Huguenots.
Similar legislation was passed at various times in the sixteenth century by Catholic and Protestant rulers in Germany, Poland, and Transylvania. In 1571 the Austrian Hapsburgs themselves granted a special dispensation to nobles in Lower Austria to worship as Protestants.
There was also the extraordinary French preacher and theologian Sebastian Castellio (1515–1563), who famously protested the execution of the Spanish theologian, philosopher, and physician Miguel Servetus in Calvinist Geneva on charges of heresy and blasphemy for denying the concept of the Holy Trinity. Servetus’s execution was largely due to the efforts of John Calvin himself, whom Castellio passionately denounced in his pamphlet
De haereticis an sint persecuendi
(Whether Heretics Should Be Persecuted, 1554), which condemned all such executions and argued that “to burn a man does not defend a doctrine, but slays a man.”
13
It would take many centuries of bloody religious conflict and political and social evolution before this idea was accepted as a permanent principle in Europe. For most European states in the sixteenth century, religious conformity was an
instrumentum regni
, an “instrument of ruling” that served to legitimize the authority of rulers over their subjects and the projection of power beyond their borders. This principle was firmly embedded in the House of Hapsburg, with its aspirations toward a universal Catholic monarchy, and it was also an integral component of Spanish imperial ideology, which always presented its external conquests as a religious imperative on behalf of the Catholic faith. This convergence between religion and statecraft is crucial to understanding Spain’s rejection of its own more tolerant traditions and its evolution into the society described by Rodrigo Manrique, the son of the Inquisitor General, in a letter to an exiled friend in 1533 that described his country as “a land of envy, pride, and . . . barbarism” in which “no one can possess a smattering of letters without being suspect of heresy, error, and Judaism.”
Like their counterparts elsewhere in Europe, Spanish rulers regarded religious dissent as a potential threat to their political authority. To a society that saw Spain’s recent triumphs on the international stage as an indication of divine favor, religious purity was essential to ensure Spain’s continuing power and prestige in the outside world. To achieve this objective, its rulers were prepared to dismantle a model of coexistence that had prevailed for centuries and still remained within the living memory of their subjects. Throughout the sixteenth century, Moriscos and Protestants were often prosecuted by the Inquisition for expressing the scandalous belief that “each could be saved according to their own law.” To the Church and the Crown, such views were heretical and dangerous. With the option of freedom excluded, the authorities were faced with the daunting task not only of enforcing outward religious conformity on a Morisco population that had for the most part come unwillingly to Christianity, but also of ensuring that the Moriscos became fully committed Christians
de corazon
, “in their hearts.”

Other books

Brighton by Michael Harvey
Frozen Moment by Camilla Ceder
Guts vs Glory by Jason B. Osoff
It's a Tiger! by David LaRochelle
Putin's Wars by Marcel H. Van Herpen
Death in the Polka Dot Shoes by Marlin Fitzwater