Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?

© William Lane Craig, Ph.D.

All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form
or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording,
scanning, or other—except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.

Published in Pine Mountain, Georgia,
by Impact 360 Institute
(
www.impact360institute.org
).
Know. Be. Live.

Impact 360 Institute titles may be purchased in bulk
for educational, business, fund-raising, or sales promotional use.
For information, please e-mail
[email protected]
.

Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version
^®
(ESV
^®
),
copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers.
Used by permission. All rights reserved.

Editorial team: Jonathan Morrow, Miriam Drennan
Cover design: Ellen Parker Bibb

Softcover ISBN: 978-0-9915977-0-3
E-book ISBN: 978-0-9915977-1-0

Printed in the United States of America

We exist to equip a new generation of Christ-centered
influencers to understand, defend, and live out their faith in
the marketplace. Here are some of the ways we do this:

•
         
Immersion
—a 2-week Christian worldview and
leadership training experience for high school students.
(3 hours of college credit available)

•
         
Gap Year
—a 9-month academic experience that includes
a month-long international mission trip to Brazil
(18 hours of college credit)

•
         
Masters
—a unique and innovative graduate experience
for young adults preparing to enter areas of higher
education, student life, student campus ministry, or
further graduate study.

•
         
Speakers Series
—Sign-up to be a part of Impact 360
Institute’s Speaker Series LiveStream and be equipped
to engage some of our culture’s toughest questions.

FIND OUT MORE:
impact360institute.org

COMING SUMMER 2014!

“A robust natural theology may well be necessary for the
gospel to be effectively heard in Western society today.”
-DR. WILLIAM LANE CRAIG

In his follow-up to
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?,
Dr. Craig takes a departure from divine revelation
to present the powerful philosophical, scientific,
moral, and ontological arguments found in natural
theology. Premise-by-premise, point-by-point,
Dr. Craig qualifies and quantifies the case for God
in language our post-Christian culture understands.

FIND OUT MORE:
impact360institute.org

Contents

INTRODUCTION

PART I
:
THE EMPTY TOMB

CHAPTER 1
: Historical Credibility
CHAPTER 2
: Independent Accounts
CHAPTER 3
: Mark’s Account and The Embarrassment of
Women Witnesses
CHAPTER 4
: The Jewish Polemic

PART II:
POST-MORTEM APPEARANCES

CHAPTER 5:
Peter, the Disciples, and the Five Hundred
CHAPTER 6:
James and Other Apostles, Including Saul of Tarsus
CHAPTER 7:
Conclusions

PART III:
THE ORIGIN OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH

CHAPTER 8:
Convictions of a Promised Messiah and
the Resurrection Itself
CHAPTER 9:
The Inconsistencies

PART IV:
EXPLAINING THE EVIDENCE

CHAPTER 10:
Assessing Hypotheses
CHAPTER 11:
Conspiracy Hypothesis
CHAPTER 12:
Apparent Death Hypothesis
CHAPTER 13:
Displaced Body Hypothesis
CHAPTER 14:
Hallucination Hypothesis
CHAPTER 15:
Resurrection Hypothesis

CONCLUSION

ENDNOTES

INTRODUCTION

The Christian faith is predicated upon the remarkable claim that a historical person, Jesus of Nazareth, rose from the dead and therefore was, as he claimed, God’s Son in a unique sense. But how credible is the claim of Jesus’ resurrection? We will investigate that question historically.

Now one doesn’t come to a study of Jesus’ resurrection in a vacuum. Every investigator brings with him certain assumptions, which he presupposes in his inquiry and which, if challenged, might themselves become the subject of investigation and justification. Permit me, then, to state very clearly two presuppositions with which I approach our question.

First, I presuppose the existence of God, as demonstrated by the arguments of natural theology, such as the cosmological, teleological, and axiological arguments. This is the approach taken by classical defenders of the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection such as Hugo Grotius, Samuel Clarke, and William Paley, as well as by such contemporary scholars as Wolfhart Pannenberg, Richard Swinburne, and Stephen Davis.

Now I realize that many people today don’t share this presupposition; atheists and agnostics don’t acknowledge the existence of a transcendent Creator and Designer of the universe. This is a huge difference in one’s worldview that will, of course, radically affect how one assesses competing explanations of the facts. But our space and topic are limited, so if one is interested in the justification for belief in God’s existence, one may consult my forthcoming book in this same series on that subject.
¹

Second, I presuppose that our background knowledge includes a good deal of information about the historical Jesus, including his radical personal claims, his teaching, and his crucifixion. In so doing, I stand squarely in the mainstream of New Testament scholarship concerning the historical Jesus. Again, I realize that radical critics don’t share this presupposition. But the majority of New Testament scholars today agree that the historical Jesus possessed an unparalleled sense of authority, the authority to stand and speak in the place of God Himself. He claimed that in himself the Kingdom of God had come, and he carried out a ministry of miracle-working and exorcisms as signs of that fact. According to the German theologian Horst George Pohlmann:

Today there is virtually a consensus... that Jesus came on the scene with an unheard of authority, with the claim of the authority to stand in God’s place and speak to us and bring us to salvation. With regard to Jesus there are only two possible modes of behavior: either to believe that in him God encounters us or to nail him to the cross as a blasphemer.
Tertium non datur.
[There is no third way.]
²

So I’m also very safely situated with respect to my second presupposition.

An investigation of the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus will involve two steps:
First,
one must establish what facts are to be explained and,
second,
one must ask whether Jesus’ resurrection is the best explanation of those facts. There are basically three main purported facts at issue: