Eight Little Piggies (48 page)
Read Eight Little Piggies Online
Authors: Stephen Jay Gould
Lamarck, J. P. B. 1804. Sur un nouvelle espèce de Trigonie et sur une nouvelle d’Huître découvertes dans le voyage du capitaine Baudin.
Annales du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle
4:353–54.
Lamarck, J. P. B. 1809.
Philosophie zoologique
. Paris: Dentu.
Leakey, R., and M. Leakey. 1986. A new Miocene hominoid from Kenya.
Nature
324:143–46.
Leakey, R., and M. Leakey. 1986. A second new Miocene hominoid from Kenya.
Nature
324:146–48.
Liem, K. F. 1988. Form and function of lungs: The evolution of air breathing mechanisms.
American Zoologist
28:739–59.
Loftus, E. F. 1979.
Eyewitness testimony
. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lyell, C. 1832.
Principles of geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the earth’s surface by reference to causes now in operation
. vol. 2. London: John Murray.
Malthus, T. R. 1803.
An essay on the principles of population
. London: J. Johnson.
McGowan, C. 1989. The ichthyosaurian tailbend: A verification problem facilitated by computer tomography.
Paleobiology
15:429–36.
McGowan, C. 1989.
Leptopterygius tenuirostris
and other long-snouted ichthyosaurs from the English Lower Lias.
Palaeontology
32:409–27.
Mivart, St. G. 1871.
On the genesis of species
. London: MacMillan.
Monod, J. 1971.
Chance and necessity; an essay on the natural philosophy of modern biology
. New York: Knopf.
Murray, J., and B. Clarke. 1980. The genus
Partula
on Moorea: Speciation in progress.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London
211:83–117.
Owen, R. 1840. Note on the dislocation of the tail at a certain point observable in the skeleton of many ichthyosauri.
Transactions of the Geological Society of London
5:511–14.
Owen, R. 1849.
On the nature of limbs
. London: J. Van Voorst.
Owen, R. 1861–1881.
Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Liassic Formation
. London: Paleontographical Society.
Paley, W. 1802.
Natural theology: or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity, collected from the appearances of nature
. London: E. Paulder.
Parkinson, J. 1811.
Organic remains of a former world, examination of the mineralized remains of the vegetables and animals of the antediluvian world generally termed extraneous fossils
. London: Sherwood, Neely and Jones.
Patten, W. 1912.
The evolution of vertebrates and their kin
. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son.
Patten, W. 1920.
The grand strategy of evolution
. Boston: Gorham Press.
Prothero, D. R., and N. Shubin. 1983. Tempo and mode of speciation in Oligocene mammals.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs
15(6):665.
Quoy, J., and J. Gaimard. 1834.
Voyage de découvertes de l’Astrolabe exécuté par ordre du Roi pendant les années 1826–29; Zoologie
, vol. 3. Paris: J. Tatsu.
Ramsköld, L., and Hou X. 1991. New early Cambrian animal and onychophoran affinities of enigmatic metazoans.
Nature
351:225–28.
Raup, D. M. 1979. The size of the Permo-Triassic bottleneck and its evolutionary implications.
Science
206:217–18.
Ray, J. 1691.
The wisdom of God manifested in works of the creation
. London: William Innys.
Reichert, C. B. 1837. Entwicklungsgeschichte der Gehörknöchelchen der sogenannte Meckelsche Fortsatz des Hammers.
Müller’s Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin
, 178–88.
Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the Tungara frog
Physalaemus pustulosus
(sexual selection for sensory exploitation).
Evolution
44:305–14.
Ryan, M. J., J. H. Fox, W. Wilczynski, and A. S. Rand. 1990. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog
Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature
343:66–67.
Sacks, O. 1985.
The man who mistook his wife for a hat
. New York: Summit Books.
Sagan, C., and A. Druyan. 1985.
Comet
. New York: Random House.
Scheuchzer, J. 1708.
Piscium querelae et vindiciae
. Zurich: Gessner.
Shubin, N. H., and P. Alberch, 1986. A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. In
Evolutionary Biology
, vol. 20, ed. M. K. Hecht, B. Wallace, and G. T. Prance, 319–87. New York: Plenum Publications.
Smith, A. 1776.
The wealth of nations
. London: Strahan and Cadell.
Snell, O. 1891. Die Abhängigkeit des Hirngewichtes von dem Körpergewicht und den geistigen Fähigkeiten.
Archiv für Psychiatrie und NervKrankheiten
23:436–46.
Stauffer, R. C. (ed.) 1975.
Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection; being the second part of his big species book written from 1856 to 1858
. London: Cambridge University Press.
Stensiö, E. A. 1927.
Downtonian and Devonian vertebrates of Spitsbergen, part 1, family Cephalaspidae
. Oslo.
Theunissen, B. 1989.
Eugène Dubois and the ape-man from Java; the history of the first ‘missing link’ and its discoverer
. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Thompson, D. W. 1917.
On growth and form
. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
Tinbergen, N. 1960.
The herring gull’s world
. New York: Lyons & Burford.
Ussher, J. 1645.
A body of divinity: or, the sum and substance of Christian religion
. Dublin: John Downham.
Ussher, J. 1650.
Annales veteris testamenti, a prima mundi origine deducti
. Vols. 8–11 in the
Whole works
of Ussher, ed. C. R. Elrington and J. H. Todd. Dublin. 17 vols. (1847–64).
Ussher, J. 1653.
The annals of the world. Deduced from the origin of time, and continued to the beginning of the emperour Vespasians reign, and the totall destruction and abolition of the temple and commonwealth of the Jews
. London: E. Tyler.
Vermeij, G. J. 1986. The biology of human-caused extinction. In
The Preservation of Species
, ed. B. G. Norton, 28–49. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Vermeij, G.J. 1987.
Evolution and escalation
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian Merostomata. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, II.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
57:17–40.
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian holothurians and medusae. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, II.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
57:41–68.
Walcott, C. D. 1911. Middle Cambrian annelids. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, II.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
57:109–44.
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostaca, Trilobita and Merostomata. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, II.
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
57:145–228.
Wallace, A. R. 1889.
Darwinism, an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications
. London: MacMillan.
Wayne, R. K. 1986. Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids: The influence of development on morphological change.
Evolution
40:243–61.
Whitman, C. O. 1904. The problem of the origin of species.
Congress of Arts and Science, Universal Exposition, St. Louis
, Vol. 5.
Whitman, C. O. 1919.
Orthogenetic evolution in pigeons
. Edited by Oscar Riddle.
Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications
257.
*
This reference, at the very end of the essay, elicited a firestorm of correspondence. I love nothing more than a brouhaha about a really tiny and tangential item in my essays. I knew this one was coming! Here I am, writing about the deepest issues of life and death, and what do I get? A horde of letters on Pinza’s final note, most telling me that he ended on the third above the tonic, and some accusing me of gross musical stupidity (the only form of ignorance that I probably do not possess). But, as I said, I knew it was coming and should have been on my guard, for all parties in this controversy are right. The main rendition does end on the third, but the line reappears several times and often ends on the tonic. I never liked that ending on the third (awkward, and even the great Pinza didn’t always make it right on pitch). Moreover,
tonic
, with its multiple meanings, works so much better in a literary sense for the last line of the essay. In any case, I did ponder the issue, and I made a deliberate decision, perhaps not for the best. But thanks to everyone for writing. Details are all that matters: God dwells there, and you never get to see Him if you don’t struggle to get them right.
*
After this article first appeared in
Natural History
, Bryan Clarke wrote me a letter with the following interesting information on both frustration and hope:
The story is more depressing than you know. I wrote to the French
Service de l’Economie Rurale
before
Euglandina
was introduced, asking them not to do so. They replied saying that they had not yet decided the matter, but would let me know. Of course they didn’t. A similar correspondence took place between Jack Burch at Michigan and the USDA about introducing the Uglies into Hawaii. It got very heated.
There are some little rays of hope. First, it seems that
Euglandina
has not yet reached Huahine, Raiatea or Tahaa, where
Partula
are still, it is said, surviving. I’m going this summer to check. There
may
still be
Partula
on Bora Bora. Second, the French are proposing to set up a snail conservation and study centre on Moorea (shutting the stable door…), and we are looking at ways of making ‘cages’ in the woods. There is also a faint hope of a refuge inside the crater of Mehetia (an extinct volcano about 60 miles SE of Tahiti).
*
The name Septuagint derives from the legend that seventy-two translators (close to the Latin
septuaginta
, or “seventy”)—six from each of the twelve tribes of Israel—worked in separate rooms and made their own translations. When they compared their results, all were identical. If the linguistic mishmash seems odd—Jews translating The Hebrew Bible into Greek in Egypt—remember that Alexander the Great conquered Egypt and established the Ptolemies as a Greek ruling family.
*
I received Charles Darwin’s personal card from an anthropological colleague who found it in his museum, amidst some items that Darwin had collected. He most kindly sent it to me with the following note: “I assume that Mr. Darwin meant to leave this card for you; you must have been out when he called.” The Walcott card belonged to his wife, the formidable Mary Vaux Walcott (note T. H. Clark’s description later in this essay). In the original version of this piece, I missed the little squiggle of an
s
at the end of the title—Mrs. rather than Mr.—and attributed the card to C. D. Walcott himself. (Having companions in error is no excuse, but the editor of
Natural History
told me that several levels of editors and compositors had scrutinized the article and its illustrations, and no one had noticed the misattribution.)
Attentive readers, of course, noted my error; the resulting correspondence was fascinating and, I suppose, predictable. Most mentioned the error gently, acknowledging the easy confusion if names of husbands and wives be distinguished only by a tiny wavy line at the end of a superscript. A few angry feminists accused me of just one more lamentable example in ignoring women, to the point of making them invisible. My response here must be quite contrary: I had, of course, not forgotten the old custom, particularly among wives of social rank, for submerging individuality by self-identification as Mrs. plus a husband’s full name. But, as this custom is now happily passing away, thanks in large part to increasing sensitivity produced by feminist critiques, I simply hadn’t been alert enough to remember and suspect. When I saw “Charles Doolittle Walcott,” I assumed the man himself and didn’t scrutinize the preceding title. My error, in other words, arose from the successes of feminism and not as a rearguard action against the proper acknowledgment of women.
This change to correct attribution does not compromise the essay which, after all, began with an anecdote about honoring Laura Ingalls Wilder through purchasing replicas of her daughter’s calling card.
*
I originally thought that this paragraph contained three errors—and said so in the original version, with a snide (if unstated) implication that Barrington, perhaps, deserved his reputation as dilettante. But Joseph B. Russell wrote to inform me that Salzburg was, in 1756 (before Austria existed), subject to the Duchy of Bavaria, and that Saltzbourg is an acceptable Anglicization. Mozart was, however, born on January 27, not January 17. This may be a simple error of transcription or typesetting—or, perhaps, Barrington got confused by some aspect of the approximately ten-day difference imposed by the Gregorian calendric reform, then so recently accepted in England (see Essay 12 on this point). In any case, my respect for Barrington, evident throughout the essay, increases again.