Authors: Maggie Gee
But why did I feel, even at that point, that I would cease to exist if I couldn't go on writing? Why have I always needed to write? In a way, it has always defined my life. It made me think I could never have children; I accepted it; I had to be a writer. I wrote poetry from infants' school onwards. It's as if I had signed up to some cult at six. In my last long vacation from Oxford, I wrote my first novel, in a four-week monastic burst of activity, up in the attic of a chalet in Switzerland my parents had rented with my father's brother, the very first time we hadn't gone camping. I wrote it, really, by arithmetic. This is the meaning of âIgnorance is bliss.' I thought, âThe average novel is 100,000 words long,' and divided that sum by the available days (25), so wrote 4,000 words a day, because that was what was needed to get it done, though it did seem to mean an awful lot of work, and left me no time to reread what I had written.
My father had given me a âcan-do' attitude. I'm grateful to him. For all my naivety, for all the weaknesses of what I poured out, something important had been achieved. I remember the happiness of the last day, when I had dotted the âi's of the last sentence, and walked up with Aunty Hilda through the pines to the resort of Montana Vermala, where we bought exotic food to entertain the others. How game Hilda was, Dad's younger brother's wife, a trait which perhaps helped her live into her nineties, surviving all the brothers and all the other wives. Our one rule on that happy day was: âBuy food that none of us has eaten before.'
I remember only vine leaves stuffed with rice, which were unknown in Britain in 1969. I was utterly happy as we climbed down the mountain with bags full of oily, alien food. I was queen of the earth. I was a novelist, now, because I'd written a novel.
And there's some truth to the idea that getting to the end was all that mattered. With novels, it's the length that kills, as Robert Louis Stevenson remarked, and I'd proved I had the drive and the stamina to do it. Then, in my twenties, as I added degreesâan Oxford BLitt, the PhDâand between them, worked two years in publishing, I struggled to keep writing in the gaps. I wrote long narrative poems, tried out novellas. In a six-month interlude âon the dole' between leaving publishing and moving to Wolverhampton to start a doctorate, I wrote, in an isolated cottage in Oxford, the book that would become my first published novel, an âexperimental thriller' called
Dying in Other Words
. I had a half-formed thought, from the depth of my innocence:
I think this will win me the Booker Prize
. But the two publishers I sent it to did not agree, though one of them asked me out to lunch, and said, in effect, he would probably publish if I would cut the last third of the book, a bizarre section of poems and prose supposedly written by my heroine, Moira.
Cut? I was shocked. Of course I would not. I was on the high horse of my higher degrees, and practical concerns were nothing to me. Nor did I understand what was obvious: you must keep sending books out, again and again. I somehow just felt my day would come.
And five years later, thanks (once again) to a friend (which one? I still don't know) who told a publisher I had something worth seeing, a small publisher in Sussex, Harvester Press, wrote me a letter asking to see
the manuscript, âwith a view to finding the statue in the stone'.
Cheek! âSend us your rubbish, and we'll turn it into art.' But I posted the manuscript, which had only been greying and wrinkling in some corner, and forgot all about it when there was no response.
Six months later, a letter came offering a £500 advance to publish it. I learned much later that the manuscript had been read by that great man and novelist, David Hughes, author of
The Little Book
, who liked my strange tale, and recommended publication. Without him, who's to say I would have continued? He didn't reveal the role he had played until some years after we got to know each other in the mid-1990s. My first book, so odd and passionate, might have gone to a dozen other readers, but David was there at the crossroads, unseen, and gave me the secret benediction of luck. It had happened again: the universe split, and in the one I remember, I received the right letter.
I was amazed when I opened the envelope. I read it again and again for the catch. I called up my brother, and he, his girlfriend Liz and I sat out on Chiswick Green, under a sunset sky, and celebrated in the summer evening with a bottle of wine. We were, all three, as amazed as each other. I was clearly never, ever, going to get published. Then suddenly I was. And now we were here. The impossible was all about me: a crimson glory sinking into brilliant indigo, the dark grass stretching away into the trees where every mystery might be waiting for me, the lights of passing cars winging over our faces, the stars of happiness steadying above, becoming clearer and more confident.
I came out in July, when few books were published, and got ârave reviews', the kind that welcome a new arrival. Thanks to my friend Tony Holden, who was deputy editor,
The Times
ran a full page extract. A team of judges who included Brian Aldiss and Hermione Lee put me in the top twelve of the Booker submissions, on what would now be called the Booker longlist. My luck seemed to grow exponentially, as if it had seeded in the dark of delay through the seven years the book was confined in its drawer, and had burst out, shining and fat, a pale puffball. I got a letter from Robert McCrum at Faber, declaring himself a huge fan of the novel and saying how delighted he would be to read anything I liked to send him. (What did I do with it? Did I write back? No, I was paralysed as well as delighted. My heart beat too fast. I put it in a frame.) I was included in the list of twenty âBest of Young British Writers', the original one with Martin Amis, Pat Barker, William Boyd, Buchi Emecheta, Kazuo Ishiguro, Adam Mars Jones, Ian McEwan, Philip Norman, Clive Sinclair, Graham Swift, Rose Tremain, AN Wilson and other famous names. I was blonde, young for that group, photogenic, though in fact photo sessions were agony. In ninety per cent of the shots I would look taut and nervous, but a lucky few caught me beginning to smile at the absurd novelty of being half-famous.
The Times
sent a photographer to take my portrait, and spread it, huge, beside their two-page feature on our group. (It must have been annoying. I had only published one novel. But I revelled in that fifteen minutes in the sun.) Then I was awarded the prestigious University of East Anglia Writing Fellowship, against stiff competition that included Andrew Motion. I was suddenly shooting down the rapids, though I didn't have a clue how to
steer the canoe. I got an agent, Mark Hamilton, who took charge. My next novel,
The Burning Book
, was bought by Faber for the sum of £4,500; the third,
Light Years
, for £10,000.
But by then, I was starting to break the rules. I was living with a man. I was happy with him. I wasn't always alone, reading and writing. I ate meals with Nick, instead of a book. I got married, and my agent worried, and my publisher sent Nick around the world to write his book about Robert Louis Stevenson.
In a way, things were going swimmingly. Suddenly I had love, work and money, only a couple of years after a thirtieth birthday made bleak by my sense that I had none of them. But in another breath, there were problems ahead, and I hadn't the experience to see them, or avoid them. Four years in, then five years in, my magnificent puffball of luck seemed to expire in a slow soft sigh of missing increments. I wasn't winning prizes, while the peers who joined Faber not long before meâPeter Carey, Kazuo Ishiguroâhad won, or been shortlisted for, the Booker. Faber made less effort with the paperback of
Light Years
than they had promised in a florid memo which mentioned dump-bins and national tours. (So what? I would think now, but I was young and headstrong, and believed the enormous praise I had received, and took it for granted that, if I was good, I would automatically get sales and prizes.) How young I was. How very foolish. And the family trait of anger let me down. Anger and rashness, which you could call passion, but self-righteousness also, which makes us all blind. I quarrelled with Robert, and left my agent, swayed by what I now think was largely empty praise from a youngish female agent who approached me at some âBest of Young British' jamboree and said she thought I was âthe bees'
knees'. (Meaning what? Perhaps nothing. But I thought she would dust me with the pollen of money.)
These days I get on with publishers. I haven't argued with them for a decade, except for the odd callisthenic textual wrangle that invigorates the editor-writer relationship. But in those days I argued, and Robert wrote a letter saying goodbye when Rosa was not many months old, and
Grace
was still languishing in notebooks. The timing was dreadful, just after childbirth. Everything was suddenly uncertain. I didn't like the novel I had written while pregnant, and yet I had no time to rewrite it. I had a new agent, but no publisher. I was thirty-eight, potentially a dangerous age, although I believed I would be young for ever, though I still looked young, and slimmer than before as I ran around Rosa, and (quite soon) after her.
And here I am still, running around the subject, avoiding the nub of the question I askedâwriting and Rosa: Rosa and writing. Before Rosa, writing. Why write? Why Rosa? How in heaven's name could I have both? I have been kicking up dust for several pages, unable to touch the heart of things.
I have to write because I have to speak. Most genuine art is a break for freedom, a run into the light, evading the warders. Then craft comes in, refining, restraining, but the initial impulse is usually rebellion, the will to bring something new into the world. In the home I grew up in, too much was not spoken, or was dangerous to speak, suppressed and diverted. This is normal, of course. There are taboos and customs.
The custom in our house was, defer to the male. My father always had the last word. My brother John,
being four years older, and very brilliant, knew more than me, and must have had more say, though that's simplifyingâhe also represented more of a challenge to my father, which sometimes made his position precarious. My younger brother arrived when I was nine, so he wasn't really part of the original family that established my sense of the universe I lived in, and my place in it as the youngest and most fearful. For the taboos in our house were backed up by fear, and once the fear was removed, once I had fled the coop and the old cock could no longer harry his flock, I wrote irrepressibly and joyously. And in social life, I couldn't bear to be talked down; still can't, to the cost of many talkative men who assume women only want to sit and listen. I like to listen, very much, I like to ask questions and learn from the answers, but I sometimes like to speak, as well, and sometimes I'm not ready to stop speaking. âLeave it,' was my father's way of closing subjects where we disagreed with him, or upset him. But he couldn't tell me to leave my writing. He didn't know I was doing it. And when he read things I had written, poems or stories, he praised them and encouraged me, not seeing that one day this precocious skill would enable me to write about the family, not seeing that I was acquiring the tools I needed to tunnel my way out into the open.
Though the nature of writing is always two-edged: it frees you, but it makes you work to excess. The novel is far too long, as a form, but still too short and too unyielding to relive your own life and make it right. The book suddenly takes off somewhere else, on its own. It makes a dash for the future as well as the past. It grows bored with the self, and seeks otherness. So I never quite found the infinite terrain where I could reinvent and absolve myself. But I think that's the impulse,
I think that's why I do it. And yet the ground always falls away, the truth is not quite there, the door's only half-open.
It is not your own life, though it is your own life. I can't climb inside, yet so much of me is there.
My books are more me than anything else. That means âmore
of
me' not âmore
to
me'; I could never say my work was more to me than Rosa or Nick; in the old conundrum, âWhat do you save from the burning library, the irreplaceable books or the abandoned baby?', I could not save the books when the baby was crying. Yet the books, my books, matter more to my ego, to the frail-tough wavering stalk of me that holds me to the light where I can live in the world, have a husband, child, friends, ânormality'. Maybe books allowed me to have my baby, made me stable enough to hold someone else. In that sense, the books I have written are me. They are better than me, less flawed, less impassioned, less swayed by brief feelings of hurt or anger, more able to see other human beings from their own point of view, rather than as the source of personal wounds or blessings which they can turn into in the shock of the moment, the shocking rawness of everyday life. Books are more accurate, more beautiful, less messy. And they waste no time; instead, they save it. I hate wasting time. Time is precious. My twelve books, piled pell mell on the shelf, have made something solid from the time flashing past: and with this one, there will be thirteen.
(For the first time, now my own life is stage centre. Am I straining to turn my best profile to the light?)
I write to reinvent, to impose order. To make the world outside the book bearable. To say there can be more than the violent chaos that sometimes washed
about me when I was growing up. To tell the world what I think of it, too, to answer back:
this is me, I see you
. It was the same thing, really, long, long ago, when around the age of five I tacitly asserted that I could do more than copy the words on the blackboard, adding writing of my own to my first school âWriting' books. I was a law-abiding girl; and yet there I was, writing, working inwards from the back pages of the notebook to meet the âofficial' pages at the front, mostly rhyming âpoems' I thought I invented, as the first poet in the history of my world, pairing fish and dish, cat and mat.