Authors: Philippa Langley
Tags: #Nonfiction, #Plantagenets, #Royalty, #England/Great Britain, #Science, #15th Century
Yorkists defeat Lancastrians at Battle of Towton
12 June 1461
Richard and his brother George return to England
1 November 1461
Richard created Duke of Gloucester
May 1464
Edward IV marries Elizabeth Woodville
September 1465
Richard resident in household of Earl of Warwick
January 1469
Richard returns to court
June 1469
Warwick’s rebellion starts
26 July 1469
Battle of Edgecote. Henry Tudor’s guardian, William, Lord Herbert, Earl of Pembroke defeated by rebels and subsequently executed
17 October 1469
Richard made Constable of England
12 March 1470
Warwick rebels again. Battle of Losecote Field. Warwick and Clarence flee to France and ally themselves with the Lancastrians
2 October 1470
Warwick invades; collapse of Edward IV’s authority. Richard accompanies Edward into exile in Burgundy. Readeption (Restoration) of Henry VI
March 1471
Edward IV and Richard return from exile and land in Yorkshire
14 April 1471
Earl of Warwick is defeated at the Battle of Barnet
4 May 1471
Margaret of Anjou and the Lancastrian Prince Edward are defeated at Tewkesbury
21 May 1471
Henry VI is murdered in the Tower of London, almost certainly on Edward IV’s orders
Spring 1472
Richard marries Warwick’s daughter Anne Neville, starts to fight for a share of the Neville inheritance and begins to build up a northern affinity
29 August 1475
Edward IV and Louis XI meet at Picquigny, ending the English invasion of France. Richard shows his displeasure by absenting himself from the agreement
18 February 1478
Richard’s brother, George, Duke of Clarence, convicted of treason and executed in the Tower of London
24 August 1482
Richard invades Scotland. Berwick recaptured
9 April 1483
Death of Edward IV; succession of Edward V
29–30 April 1483
Richard and Buckingham arrest Rivers, Grey and Vaughan at Northampton and Stony Stratford and secure custody of Edward V
4 May 1483
Richard and Edward V enter London: George Neville, Duke of Bedford dies and Richard loses hereditary right to the Neville lands
10 June 1483
Richard appeals for help from northern supporters against the Woodvilles
13 June 1483
Execution of Lord Hastings and arrest of Morton and Archbishop Rotherham at council meeting
22 June 1483
Richard’s right to the throne proclaimed in a sermon by Ralph Shaw
26 June 1483
Richard becomes king
6 July 1483
Coronation of Richard III
29 August 1483
Richard arrives in York on royal progress
10 October 1483
Rebellion flares up in southern England
2 November 1483
Execution of the Duke of Buckingham at Salisbury
23 January 1484
Richard’s only parliament meets at Westminster
April 1484
Death of Richard’s son, Edward of Middleham
7 December 1484
Richard’s first proclamation against Henry Tudor
16 March 1485
Death of Richard’s queen, Anne Neville
9 June 1485
Richard arrives in Nottingham to await Henry Tudor’s landing
23 June 1485
Richard’s second proclamation against Henry Tudor
7 August 1485
Henry Tudor lands at Milford Haven
22 August 1485
Battle of Bosworth. Richard III killed; Henry Tudor (Henry VII) succeeds him
History of the Church of the Greyfriars, Leicester
1230
House in existence on Greyfriars site
1255
Church of Greyfriars first mentioned
1402
Rebellion: number of greyfriars executed by Henry IV
25 August 1485
King Richard III buried in the choir of the Greyfriars Church
1495
Tomb and epitaph erected over burial by Henry VII
1538
Dissolution of the Monasteries. Greyfriars expelled and priory and church closed. Sold to John Bellowe and John Broxholme to remove roof lead and timbers
1540s
Greyfriars priory and church become ruins. Site sold to Sir Robert Catlyn
(superstructure of King Richard’s tomb removed)
1600
Site sold to Robert Herrick. Mansion house and gardens built
1611
John Speed reports King Richard’s grave lost and his bones dug up at the Dissolution
1612
Christopher Wren records a ‘handsome stone pillar’ marking the site of King Richard’s grave in Herrick’s garden
1711
Herrick’s descendants sell land to Thomas Noble. New Street laid out with houses
1759
Herrick’s mansion house sold to William Bentley
1914
Land and gardens sold to Leicestershire County Council who erect offices around it
1930s–40s
Land and gardens tarmacked to become car parks
1968
Site passes to Leicester City Council, Social Services Department
Looking for Richard project, Leicester
2004–5
Philippa Langley visits car parks. Dr John Ashdown-Hill discovers Richard III’s mtDNA
2007
University of Leicester Archaeological Services (ULAS) digs in nearby Grey Friars Street but uncovers no trace of Greyfriars Church
2008
Ashdown-Hill refutes River Soar story. Annette Carson in
Richard III: The Maligned King
asserts the king’s grave is probably in the Social Services car park
21 February 2009
Langley and Ashdown-Hill meet. Langley begins Looking for Richard (LFR) project at Cramond Inn, Edinburgh
September 2010
Leicester City Council supports LFR project
January 2011
Langley obtains TV rights to John Ashdown-Hill’s book,
Last Days of Richard III
March 2011
Langley commissions ULAS for LFR project
June 2011
Langley receives permission from Leicester City Council for Ground Penetrating Radar Survey and archaeological investigation of Social Services car park
28 August 2011
Langley carries out Ground Penetrating Radar Survey of the three car parks
March 2012
April dig cancelled
July 2012
International Appeal saves dig
25 August 2012
Two-week dig begins. Leg bones discovered beside letter ‘R’
31 August 2012
Langley instructs exhumation of remains found beside letter ‘R’. ULAS applies for licence to exhume up to six sets of remains of persons unknown
3 September 2012
Discovery of Greyfriars Church. Exhumation licence received from Ministry of Justice. Dig extended into third week by Leicester City Council
4 September 2012
Exhumation of remains beside letter ‘R’ begins
5 September
Full set of remains exhumed (minus feet). Discovery of choir of church
12 September 2012
Announcement of discovery of the remains thought to be those of Richard III
6 December 2012
Carbon-14 dating analysis confirms remains are late fifteenth century
16 January 2013
Facial reconstruction revealed to Langley
3 February 2013
DNA match confirmed between remains and Michael Ibsen (living relative of Richard III)
4 February 2013
University of Leicester confirms remains found on 25 August 2012 are those of Richard III. Channel 4 and Darlow Smithson Productions premiere
Richard III: The King in the Car Park
Introduction
The Inspiration
I
SUPPOSE
I had always known about Richard. Shakespeare’s villain must have registered somewhere in the recesses of my mind, but he didn’t strike a chord with me. When I was growing up in the northern market town of Darlington, history had been my favourite subject. We had studied the Viking period through to 1066, our teacher bringing history vividly to life, and I’d revelled in the characters that formed our island nation. Oddly enough, we were never taught about Richard III and the Wars of the Roses, the conflict that tore the country apart. And there was another mystery that I discovered years later: Richard, Duke of Gloucester’s home at Middleham Castle lay a short drive away yet there had been no school trips to see the history right on our doorstep.
I began to take an interest in Richard after I read Paul Murray Kendall’s biography,
Richard III,
in which he questioned Shakespeare’s interpretation of the king, proposing a different character altogether. Kendall drew on the testimonies of those who had known Richard intimately, such as the city fathers of York who, the day after Richard’s death at Bosworth, had written:
‘
King Richard, late mercifully reigning upon us … was piteously slain and murdered, to the great heaviness of this city…’ noting he was ‘the most famous Prince of blessed memory’. Richard’s life had everything: politics, power, romance, intrigue, mystery, murder, self-sacrifice, loyalty and incredible acts of bravery. I was intrigued to know more about the man and why it had been so necessary for the Tudors to rewrite his story.
As I learned more about him I was puzzled as to why Richard had always been represented one-dimensionally on screen. The malevolent, crooked, Shakespearean figure has been rolled out since the dawning of the film industry with Hollywood portraying a tyrant in its first-ever full-length feature film,
Richard III,
in 1912. No one seemed interested in rendering a more complex, nuanced portrait while, perversely, Tudor history has been extensively filmed, television companies favouring exciting modern dramas about the Tudor monarchs who succeeded Richard III.
The Six Wives of Henry VIII,
starring Keith Michell, was screened in 1970, quickly followed by Glenda Jackson’s
Elizabeth R
and many other similar programmes. It would seem that little has changed today. HBO’s critically acclaimed
Game of Thrones
is loosely based on the Wars of the Roses but is a fantasy, and the BBC has a forthcoming modern, glossy series about the women of this period,
The White Queen,
adapted from Philippa Gregory’s trilogy, with Richard sidelined to a supporting role. Cinema, too, has recounted almost every story concerning the Tudors, but has yet to bring the actual Richard to life.
I was baffled by the industry’s apparent desire to avoid putting King Richard III’s more subtle persona centre-stage on the screen. Was this because of a general lack of interest in the character or something more profound? Perhaps Richard was too complex, and it was too difficult to find his voice. Or perhaps the establishment was happy to maintain the Tudor version of his story, in which case there was little need to reinterpret his life. After all, Shakespeare had already presented the Tudor account. Many modern works claiming to reveal the real King Richard were simply rehashes of the Tudor Richard. Villains sell.
Some independent voices, using contemporary sources who had known Richard, described a different man but they were lost among the Tudor histories. However, I was persuaded by the evidence for the real, human Richard. By now I had joined the Richard III Society, the oldest and largest historical society in the world. Its Ricardian statement of intent resonated with the ‘many features of the traditional accounts of the character and career of Richard III’ being ‘neither supported by sufficient evidence nor reasonably tenable’. Since 1924, its work has provided the platform for leading research on the man and his times. Moreover, the view of the society’s patron, the Duke of Gloucester, and his moving dedication address in 1980 in defence of ‘something as esoteric and fragile as reputation’ captivated me.
I started to write my own screenplay about Richard but, try as I might, I couldn’t make the Richard I’d found in all the primary sources square with all the deeds he was supposed to have done. I could portray Richard, the loyal, dutiful son and brother living happily in the north, undertaking the tasks he is known to have performed there – and this matched what I knew about his character – but I couldn’t make the quantum leap of propelling him on to the throne. I was confronted by a giant jigsaw puzzle where many pieces fitted together easily, reflecting Richard’s character, but the key moments remained opaque. King Richard III was an enigma. I was by no means the first writer to have this problem. There are many accounts of historians being unable to understand his actions at important points, particularly in 1483 when he took the throne. But I was approaching him from a different perspective. I had to be familiar with his character before I could put into context the many challenges of his life, rather than the other way round. The later events of Richard’s life did not define him; his character had been formed before they took place.
I wasn’t interested in creating a saintly, one-dimensional figure; that would have been as nonsensical as the sinister person presented to us for so long. And yet I couldn’t make sense of the jigsaw before me.