Authors: Christopher Simpson
Archival material on the Wannsee Institute includes interrogations of Six, Mahnke, and Twardowsky cited in source note 9, above; and “Interrogation Summary No. 1989: Walter Schellenberg,” Office of U.S. Chief Counsel for War Crimes Evidence Division, April 30, 1947, with text in German and summary in English. See also:
Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police
, microfilmed at Alexandria, Va., RG T-175, Roll 455, Frame 2971560ff., for documentation concerning Wannsee's role in the looting of libraries and bookdealers; Roll 456, Frame 2972093ff., for correspondence, security passes, lists of employees, etc., from the institute; and roll 457, Frame 2973523ff., for Amt VI-G correspondence concerning use of concentration camp inmates for custodial work. This collection is on microfilm in the NA and in a number of leading libraries. Office of U.S. Chief Counsel for War Crimes,
Staff Evidence Analysis, Doc. No.: NO-3022
, in the Nuremberg records at the NA, documents SS General Berger's response to one Wannsee study by Akhmeteli.
For a surviving example of a Wannsee study, see Wannsee Institute,
Kaukasus
(Berlin: Herausgegeben vom Chef der Sicherheitspolizei und des SD, 1942), now in the Library of Congress.
For Eichmann's recollection of Wannsee Conference:
Life
(November 28, 1960), pp. 24 and 101. An English translation of the Wannsee Protocol itself can be found in John Mendelsohn, ed.,
The Holocaust: The Wannsee Protocol and a 1944 Report on Auschwitz
(London and New York: Garland, 1982), which includes a commentary by Robert Wolfe of the Modern Military Branch at the NA. The translation of the protocol (known as Nuremberg Document No. NG-2586) was done by the Office of U.S. Chief Counsel for War Crimes.
On Role of Six, Ohlendorf, and Schellenberg as “Nazified professors and lawyers,” see Hühne, op. cit., p. 154.
11 | Interview with Benjamin Ferencz, July 20, 1984. On postwar work with Augsburg and Hirschfield incident, see “Special Interrogation Report No. 65,” File CI-SIR/66, subject: Barbie, Klaus (top secret), p. 4, Tab 29 of Ryan, |
12 | On need for specific approval by Clemency Board, see Charles Thayer, “Inquiries Concerning War Criminals,” p. 6 (n.d.) in Thayer Papers, at Truman Library. On Six's clemency by McCloy, see On Six's defense testimony on behalf of Eichmann mentioned in footnote, see On Six's work for Porsche: Hilberg, op. cit., p. 713. Eichmann's work for Daimler-Benz: |
13 | Dr. Emil Augsburg: For “Jew-baiting,” see Augsburg's records at the Berlin Document Center, SS No. 307925, NSDAP No. 5,518, 743. On “special tasks,” see Augsburg, “Beforderungsvorichlag: Hauptsturmführer Dr. Emil Augsburg,” July 10, 1941, Document No. 23009â23010. See also interrogation of Six and Mahnke, loc. cit. |
14 | On Augsburg's work for SS General Bernau and other employers, see “Subject: Merk, Kurt,” November 16, 1948, HQ CIC Region IV to HQ 7970th CIC Group, EUCOM, p. 2 (secret), Tab 33, Ryan, On Wannsee director Dr. Mikhail Akhmeteli, discussed in footnote: Akhmeteli's NSDAP Card No. 5360858, as well as some captured correspondence with SS General Berger, is available through the Berlin Document Center. On Akhmeteli's wartime role, see interrogation of Six and Mahnke, loc. cit.; interrogation of Schellenberg, loc. cit. (Schellenberg's testimony offers the physical description of Akhmeteli.) Secondary sources include: Alwin Ramme, |
15 | On Augsburg's work for Gehlen: Hohne and Zolling, op. cit., p. 199; Cookridge, op. cit., pp. 194 and 242. |
Chapter Five
1 | Arthur Macy Cox interview, June 7, 1984. |
2 | Cookridge, op. cit., pp. 158 and 161. Dulles quote: Höhne and Zolling, op. cit., p. xv. |
3 | Rositzke comments: For “virtually empty,” see Harry A. Rositzke, |
4 | W. Park Armstrong interview, June 17, 1983. On “retyping reports,” see Cookridge, op. cit., p. 201. Höhne comment: Höhne and Zolling, op. cit., p. 107, or see original |
5 | Marchetti interview, June 7, 1984. |
6 | Cox comments, December 15, 1983. |
7 | The author is indebted to Matthew A. Evangelista's study, “Stalin's Postwar Army Reappraised,” |
8 | On MIS/OSS rivalry see, for example, Anthony Cave Brown, |
9 | For “opportunist” quote, see “Memorandum For: Chief of Staff, United States Army, Subject: Grombach, John V.,” from James L. Collins, Acting Deputy AC of S for Intelligence, July 5, 1967 (confidential), in Grombach Dossier, No. 81177870, U.S. Army INSCOM, Fort Meade, Md. For an overview of Grombach's career, including his accomplishments in sports, see Grombach's obituary in the West Point alumni magazine |
10 | INSCOM Dossier No. 81177870 is the best single source of documentation on Grombach's professional career. See particularly “Summary of Information (SR 380â320-10)” reports for the following dates and subjects: “G-2 SPS Grombach, John Valentine,” June 1, 1955 (top secret); “N. V. Philips Co.,” June 1, 1955 (top secret); “Grombach, John V.,” September 23, 1958 (confidential); and memo from Brigadier General Richard Collins, director of plans, programs, and security to ASCoSI, Subject: Grombach, John Valentine, September 30, 1958 (secret). On Philips's role, see Grombach letter to Colonel George F. Smith, April 12, 1950, and Collins report of September 5, 1958 (secret). For quote on “pro-Marxist personnel,” the purges of OSS R&A, and the Grombach-OSS R&A conflict generally, see “G-2 SPS Grombach, John Valentine,” June 1, 1955 (top secret), and the April 12, 1950, Grombach letter to Colonel George F. Smith. On Katyn Forest massacre dispute, see Brigadier General Richard Collins memo of September 30, 1958. On Duran case, see David Oshinsky, For Grombach's comments discussed in footnote, see John V. Grombach, |
11 | On Project 1641, ibid., pp. xvii-xviii, 109, and 114; Lyman Kirkpatrick interview, April 11, 1984; and “G-2 SPS Grombach, John Valentine,” June 1, 1955 (top secret), and the April 12, 1950, Grombach letter to Colonel George F. Smith. |
12 | On resignation of McCormack and its significance, see William R. Corson, |
13 | Interview with retired officer of the Office of National Estimates (ONE), June 30, 1986. |
14 | Lukacs comments: John Lukacs, “The Soviet State at 65,” |
15 | Cable “.340: The Berlin Situation” (top secret), |
16 | Clay Papers |
17 | On effects of Clay's (and Gehlen's) “alarm”: On supposed Soviet military superiority in early postwar Europe, see, for example (on “mobile spearhead” and estimate of divisions), Evangelista, op. cit., pp. 114â16; and JIC Report, December 2, 1948, p. 2, noted in Evangelista. Also Marchetti interview, June 7, 1984. For document quoted in footnote, see “Memorandum for Chief of Staff US Army, Subject: Soviet Intentions and Capabilities 1949â1956/57,” January 4, 1949 (top secret), in Hot Files, Box 9, Tab 70, RG 319, NA, Washington, D.C. |
18 | Evangelista, op. cit., pp. 112 and 115. For |
19 | Paul Nitze, “NSC 68 and the Soviet Threat Reconsidered,” |
20 | Marchetti interview, June 7, 1984. For role of “human sources” discussed in text, see On missile gap discussed in footnote: Marchetti interview, June 7, 1984. Rositzke disagrees with Marchetti on this point, arguing that German intelligence on Soviet rocket programs was generally good; see Rositzke, op. cit., p. 20. H. A. R. (“Kim”) Philby, a Soviet double agent who penetrated the British Secret Intelligence Service, expressed his opinion of Gehlen's effectiveness after Philby had defected to the USSR. “I knew about the Gehlen unit from the summer of 1943 onwards ⦔ he commented in 1977. “It seemed to be no better than the other sections of the Dornberger's role in the missile gap affair is noted in John Prados, |
21 | Marchetti interview, June 7, 1984. |