Berlin home with his closest staff members – Werner Best, Heinrich
Müller, Heinz Jost, Walter Schellenberg and Helmut Knochen – in order
to discuss ‘the most fundamental questions’ of the impending attack on
Poland, during which the deployment of 2,000 men in four equally sized
task forces was agreed.100
The men appointed to lead the task forces and their various sub-units,
the
Einsatzkommandos
, were senior SD and Security Police officers, mostly
wel -educated, middle-class men in their late twenties to mid-thirties who
had turned to the far right during the Weimar Republic. Heydrich insisted
on appointing individuals who possessed the ‘relevant experience and
faultless military bearing’.101 Many of the more senior commanders
such as Emanuel Schäfer, Lothar Beutel, Josef Meisinger and Heydrich’s
friend from the early SS days in Hamburg, Bruno Streckenbach, had
served in the violent Freikorps campaigns of the early 1920s. Many of
them could also build on practical experiences gathered during the annex-
ation of Austria and Czechoslovakia. Heydrich by no means regarded
their deployment in the field as a punishment but rather as an opportunity
to prove the value of the SS’s ‘fighting administration’ under fire.102
Even though the assembly of the SS task forces proceeded without
problems during Heydrich’s holiday, the nature of the working relation-
ship between the
Einsatzgruppen
and the Wehrmacht remained unclear.
The Wehrmacht commanders had been informed of the planned deploy-
ment of SS units during the forthcoming Polish campaign in the spring
of 1939. Yet the escalation of SS violence during the conquest of Austria,
Bohemia and Moravia had raised concerns within the army leadership
about an all too independent SS acting on its own initiative in the
occupied territories.103
In order to clarify the command relations between the army and the
Einsatzgruppen during the forthcoming campaign, Heydrich and Best
met with the chief of staff of the army’s General Quartermaster, Eduard
Wagner, on 29 August. As Wagner noted in his diary after the meeting:
‘We came to a quick agreement. Both rather inscrutable types. Heydrich
particularly disagreeable.’104 According to the agreement, Security Police
commanders were required to maintain close working relationships with
all local military commanders, the heads of the civil administration and
R E H E A R S A L S F O R W A R
137
Kurt Daluege’s Order Police. A liaison officer from each
Einsatzgruppe
was to be named to ensure ‘frictionless communications’ with the relevant
military and police officials.105
According to the ‘Guidelines for the Foreign Operations of the Sipo
and SD’ drafted by Werner Best and signed by Heydrich on 31 July, the
Einsatzgruppen
were instructed to ‘render impotent’ the ‘leading stratum
of the population of Poland’ and to ‘combat all elements in enemy territory
to the rear of the fighting troops who are hostile to the Reich and the
German people’.106 These tasks were part of a concerted effort to
‘neutralize’ centres of real and potential resistance. The lack of clarity as to
what exactly was meant by ‘neutralization’ and who was to be subjected to
it would give individual commanders in the field considerable leeway in
interpreting their brief – a characteristic element of Heydrich’s leadership
style and one that encouraged his men to show initiative. At the same
time, the SD was to establish an intelligence network in the field, made
up of members of the German minority, and to collect and confiscate
material pertaining to Jews, Freemasons and Catholic clergymen in
Poland.107
In terms of content, the regulations contained in these directives
provided little that was new: the sections dealing with the tasks of the
Einsatzgruppen
and their relationship with the Wehrmacht were largely
identical to the instructions sent to the task forces during the invasion of
the Sudetenland. One of the few differences was that this time the
instructions contained a section on racial hygiene, forbidding all sexual
relations with women of non-German origin as a ‘sin against one’s own
blood’, and threatening that ‘violations’ of this order would be ‘severely
punished’. At the same time, the guidelines contained regulations that
stood in profound contrast to the subsequent actions of the
Einsatzgruppen
.
For example, they stated that ‘the mistreatment or killing of detained
persons is strictly prohibited and, to the extent that it is undertaken by
other persons, it is to be prevented. Force may be used only to break up
resistance.’108
Although the formulations contained in these guidelines appear rela-
tively innocuous when compared to the reality of the invasion, neither
Heydrich nor the Wehrmacht leadership had any illusions about the
radical nature of the approaching war against Poland. At a meeting with
some fifty senior army commanders at the Berghof on 22 August 1939,
Hitler talked of the ‘destruction of Poland’ and ‘brutal approaches’.109 On
29 August, the day of the meeting between Heydrich and Wagner, the
latter informed the Chief of the Army General Staff, General Franz
Halder, that the
Einsatzgruppen
would arrest some 30,000 Poles and
deport them to concentration camps.110
138
HITLER’S HANGMAN
In mid-August, at a conference in Berlin, leading members of the
Einsatzgruppen
received further oral instructions from Heydrich and
Best, instructions which even by Heydrich’s standards were ‘extraordi-
narily radical’ and which included a ‘liquidation order for various circles of
the Polish leadership’ affecting ‘thousands’.111 According to post-war trial
testimonies of leading task-force officers present that day, Heydrich
opened the meeting by informing the men of the atrocities being
committed against ethnic Germans in Poland, noting that he expected
heavy partisan resistance against the German invasion. It was the respon-
sibility of the
Einsatzgruppen
to ‘neutralize’ these threats – particularly
those posed by saboteurs, partisans, Jews and the Polish intelligentsia – in
areas conquered by the German army, and to punish individuals who had
committed crimes against Poland’s ethnic Germans in the preceding
weeks. Although carefully guarded in his language, Heydrich insisted that
in carrying out their difficult tasks, ‘everything was allowed’.112
Heydrich’s SD was also assigned the role of staging armed border viola-
tions immediately prior to the planned attack, which could then be
blamed on the Polish side and used to justify the start of the war. Hitler
had announced to his generals at the Berghof on 22 August that he
would give ‘a propagandistic reason for starting the war, no matter
whether it is plausible or not’. Heydrich managed this top-secret opera-
tion himself and in mid-August he personally showed Himmler the
border sections he had in mind. The co-ordination of the mission was left
in the capable hands of Herbert Mehlhorn, the SD lawyer who had
advised Heydrich in his family disputes over the Halle Conservatory in
the mid-1930s.113
On 31 August, small SS units under the command of Alfred Naujocks,
dressed in Polish uniforms, attacked the radio station in Gleiwitz, a
customs house and a forestry lodge along the German–Polish border in
order to stage, as Hitler called it the following day, Polish ‘frontier viola-
tions of a nature no longer tolerable for a great power’. The men proceeded
to broadcast declarations in German and Polish through the Gleiwitz
station. They left behind a number of dead concentration-camp prisoners
who had been murdered and stuck into Polish uniforms.114
That same night in Berlin, Heydrich wrote his testament, drafted as a
private letter to his wife and signed at 2 a.m. on 1 September 1939, less
than three hours before the beginning of the German invasion of Poland.
Heydrich instructed his staff to keep this letter in the safe of his office and
to hand it to his wife only ‘when I am no longer alive’.
Dearest Lina, my beloved Children! I hope that this letter will never
leave my safe. However, both as a soldier of the Führer and as a good
R E H E A R S A L S F O R W A R
139
husband and father I have to consider all possibilities. The Führer of our
Greater Germany, Adolf Hitler, whose handshake earlier this evening
continues to burn in my hand, has already made the great decision:
tomorrow morning at 4.45 a.m. the German armies will march into
Poland; the Reichstag will convene at 10 a.m. I do not believe that
anything will happen to me. But if fate chooses differently then all my
worldly possessions shall be yours . . . Dearest Lina, I believe that even
though the past weeks have been impossibly difficult for both of us
(notably your lack of faith in me has, due to its unclear foundation,
profoundly hurt me), they have nevertheless deepened and strengthened
our relationship. Educate our children to become firm believers in the
Führer and Germany; to be true to the ideas of the Nazi movement.
[Make sure] that they strictly adhere to the eternal laws of the SS, that
they are hard towards themselves, kind and generous towards our own
people and Germany and merciless towards all internal and external
enemies of the Reich . . . My dearest Lina, I am not without faults. I
have made mistakes, both professional and human, both in thought and
in deed, but my love for you and my children is boundless. Please
remember our life together with respect and fondness. And once time
has healed the wounds, you must give our children a new father. But he
has to be a real man
[ein Kerl]
, the kind of man I aspired to be. In endless
love, Heil Hitler, Reinhard115
Heydrich’s deeply personal letter, written exclusively for his wife’s
consumption, illustrates how far he had developed since he entered the
SS in 1931. He had successfully reinvented himself as a model Nazi
and firmly believed in his new identity. The mention of the Führer’s
‘burning’ handshake, the precise instructions given for the upbringing of
his children and his insistence that Lina remarry a ‘real man’ in the true
Nazi spirit, all testify to a rare certainty of purpose and ideological
commitment that was largely a result of formative experiences within
the SS.
For Heydrich, the outbreak of the Second World War represented an
unprecedented opportunity. He had spent the first six years of the Third
Reich as Himmler’s first lieutenant, developing an ever-expanding polit-
ical police apparatus that was intricately linked with the SS. Now, against
the background of the war, intoxicating new possibilities arose. Neither
Heydrich nor anyone else in the Nazi leadership had a blueprint for the
future of Eastern Europe, but it was clear from the start that Poland –
unlike the racially allied Austria and the economically vital Protectorate
of Bohemia and Moravia – would become some sort of laboratory for
Nazi experiments in racial imperialism and ethnic engineering. The kind
140
HITLER’S HANGMAN
of utopia that Hitler, Himmler and Heydrich intended to implement
in the yet to be occupied territories remained blurry and unspecified.
What was clear was that its implementation would not be limited by the
same kind of ‘restraint’ imposed on the SS during the military campaigns
of 1938. The German attack on Poland, launched in the early morning
hours of 1 September, was to become a watershed for the Third Reich’s
war of annihilation against the ‘lesser races’ of the East.116
C H A P T ER V I
✦
Experiments with
Mass Murder
The Invasion of Poland
Invaded from three sides, unaided by its Western allies and
confronted with a militarily superior German army, the poorly prepared
Polish troops were in a hopeless situation. Although the defenders put up a
valiant fight, staging a counter-attack at Kutno on 9 September 1939 and
inflicting unexpectedly heavy losses on the invading Germans, the
Wehrmacht quickly advanced on Warsaw. On 17 September, the day the
Red Army marched into Eastern Poland in accordance with the secret
clause of the Hitler–Stalin Pact, the Polish government fled to Romania.
Warsaw fel at the end of the month and the last Polish troops surren-
dered on 6 October.1
Behind the regular troops, Heydrich’s five – later seven – SS task forces
swiftly moved across the border and descended on Poland’s civilian popu-