committed to paper’.17
When, on 12 September, Canaris drew the attention of the chief of the
German army’s High Command, General Wilhelm Keitel, to Heydrich’s
plans for large-scale executions, stressing that ‘the nobility and clergy wil be
exterminated’ and warning him that ‘the world wil hold the Wehrmacht
responsible’ for al owing these atrocities to happen, Keitel answered that this
matter had ‘already been decided by the Führer’. Hitler had made it clear to
146
HITLER’S HANGMAN
him that he aimed to destroy Poland’s intel ectual and political elite, and
that he had ordered the shootings as part of the ‘political cleansing’ of newly
conquered Polish territory. If the army did not wish to have anything to do
with the ‘ethnic exterminations’, it would have to accept that the SS and
civilian militias would carry out the liquidations independently.18
Hitler’s endorsement of SS policies was hardly surprising. Even before
the German invasion, on 22 August, he had announced to German generals
that the military campaign against Poland required a ‘brutal approach’ and
the ‘greatest toughness’, a stance that was further radicalized by the subse-
quent attacks on ethnic Germans in Poland.19 Shortly after the Bromberg
massacre, on 11 September, the Army High Command official y notified
General Adolf Strauss, commander of the Fourth Army, that Hitler had
authorized Himmler to arrest 500 hostages in Bromberg and that summary
executions were to be carried out until the city was ‘pacified’. The army was
explicitly ordered not to hinder the
Einsatzgruppen
in carrying out their
task. Receiving this order, Strauss was less concerned about the mass kil ings
themselves than by the apparent loss of the army’s executive powers to the
Einsatzgruppen
, complaining to the Army High Command that the order
would lead to a ‘total reversal of responsibilities’.20
By the time Heydrich had returned to Berlin from his inspection tour
of the task forces in the field, the smouldering conflict between the
Wehrmacht and the SS over executive competences in occupied Poland
was threatening to escalate. On 18 September, Brauchitsch reminded the
army commanders in the field that the Wehrmacht was the sole executive
authority in the occupied territories and that orders from any party agency
affecting the judicial autonomy of the military courts were to be ignored.
This was a scarcely concealed blow against SS ambitions. On the very
same day, Himmler reiterated his earlier order to the Security Police
commanders in the operational area that ‘all members of Polish insurgent
groups are to be shot’. The military commanders in Poland were once
again not informed of this order.21
In view of the mounting tensions between the SS and the army leader-
ship, Heydrich and Wagner met again on 19 September and engaged in ‘a
highly important, necessary and open’ conversation about the rapidly dete-
riorating relationship between the Wehrmacht and the
Einsatzgruppen
.
Wagner insisted that the army be informed of the
Einsatzgruppen
’s exact
tasks. In response, Heydrich confirmed that the task assigned to him by
Hitler was the ‘fundamental cleansing’ of Jews, clergy and nobility from
Poland. Wagner did not object to the planned liquidations as such, but he
was keen to keep the army dissociated from them. In particular, he and
Heydrich agreed that the ‘ground sweeping’ operation should only be carried
out after the military administration over Poland had come to an end.22
E x P E R I M E N T S W I T H M A S S M U R D E R
147
Although the terms of the agreement necessitated a delay in what he
considered to be pressing policing actions, Heydrich was nonetheless
pleased with the outcome of the meeting. That same afternoon, he
informed his senior staff that ‘a highly advantageous result’ had been
achieved. Even if the
Einsatzgruppen
would continue to be formally
subordinate to the army commanders, they would nonetheless receive
their orders directly from him.23
The following day, Hitler authorized the agreement that had been
reached between Heydrich and Wagner. In a meeting with Heydrich,
Himmler and Brauchitsch, the Führer reassured an uneasy Brauchitsch
that major ethnic cleansing campaigns would begin only after executive
power had been handed over by the army to a civilian administration.
Adjusting to these new realities, Brauchitsch informed his army
commanders on 21 September that the
Einsatzgruppen
had been ordered
by the Führer ‘to carry out certain ethnic tasks in the occupied territory’.
He chose not to elaborate on the nature of these tasks, but insisted that
their execution would lie ‘outside the responsibilities’ of the army
commanders. Close consultation with the Security Police was to continue
to ensure that police activities would not hinder army operations.24
That Brauchitsch was not happy with this turn of events became clear
in a subsequent meeting with Heydrich the following day. Brauchitsch
again insisted that the army should be informed of all orders given to the
Einsatzgruppen
and also made it clear that he wanted Himmler’s order to
shoot ‘insurgents’ without trial rescinded. Heydrich agreed to have the
order withdrawn and to provide the army leadership with continuous
information about
Einsatzgruppen
activities. At the same time, he reiter-
ated his criticism of the apparently slow pace of the court-martial process.
Brauchitsch refused to concede the point, but stated that in order to expe-
dite the trials he had authorized the establishment of additional military
courts. He did not articulate any reservations about future ethnic-
cleansing policies and shootings, provided that the implementation of
these policies were postponed until after the military administration of
Poland had ended, thus avoiding a situation in which the armies’ reputa-
tion abroad would be tarnished or its position as the executive power in
Poland undermined by the SS.25
After Brauchitsch had left, Wagner succeeded in extracting from
Heydrich the assurance that the most notorious
Einsatzgruppe
, under the
command of Woyrsch, would be withdrawn from Poland. Heydrich was
deeply dissatisfied. Wagner, on the other hand, was jubilant. In a letter to
his wife he wrote that he had dealt ‘a great blow to invisible forces’.26
Brauchitsch and Wagner had successfully wrung concessions from
Heydrich, but if the Army High Command believed that Heydrich
148
HITLER’S HANGMAN
intended to play according to their rules, they were wrong. Although he
officially reminded the
Einsatzgruppen
commanders in September that
military operations in Poland should not be disturbed and ordered that
the shooting of insurgents was to be carried out only ‘in cases of emer-
gency’, Heydrich also ordered his men to ‘overburden’ the military courts
systematically to the extent ‘that they can no longer function properly’. He
further demanded that a record be kept of all sentences handed out by the
army’s courts so that he would be aware of any judgements that did not
call for the death penalty. Presumably he intended to keep these records
both as incriminating proof of the military courts’ inefficiency and for
future reference in the next rounds of killings.27
Since Brauchitsch never communicated any details of Hitler’s decision to
wage ethnic warfare in Poland to his military commanders in the field,
many among the officer corps objected both to the randomness of the
Einsatzgruppen
violence and to what they perceived as an SS chal enge to
their role as the sole executive power in the newly occupied territories.
Unease about SS methods turned into unmistakable and open criticism
when the military commander-in-chief in Poland, Colonel General
Johannes Blaskowitz, condemned them as ‘criminal atrocities, maltreatment
and plundering’ and signs of the SS’s ‘animal and pathological instincts’.28
When Blaskowitz’s report was passed on to Führer headquarters on
27 November 1939, a furious Hitler expressed his frustration over the
Wehrmacht’s ‘maudlin sentimentality’, and responded to Blaskowitz’s
criticism by offering an amnesty for all those who had committed atroci-
ties against Poland’s civilian population during the invasion and by ending
the military courts’ jurisdiction over the SS. If anything, the Wehrmacht’s
complaints reinforced Hitler’s determination that the emerging German
civil administration in Poland should be an instrument of, rather than an
obstacle to, Nazi racial policy.29
Building a New Racial Order
Long before the beginning of the military campaign in September 1939,
it had been clear to Heydrich that Poland would be treated differently
from the previous two areas of Nazi expansion, Austria and Czechoslovakia.
Throughout the summer, Hitler had repeatedly asserted that the war
against Poland would entail a ‘harsh racial struggle’. Unlike many
Wehrmacht commanders who deluded themselves about the true nature
of the conflict ahead of them, Heydrich had immediately understood the
implications and opportunities of Hitler’s exhortations. The task that lay
ahead of him required both energetic ruthlessness in combating Germany’s
enemies and the development of substantial policy plans to implement
E x P E R I M E N T S W I T H M A S S M U R D E R
149
Hitler’s vague ideological pronouncements. Heydrich also understood
better than some of the Wehrmacht’s senior officers that those imple-
menting the policies most attuned to Hitler’s wishes would be rewarded
with enhanced powers to enforce them.
Yet plans for what was going to happen to the majority of Poles
remained uncertain. As Heydrich explained during a meeting with senior
SS officers in Berlin on 7 September, a general consensus existed within
the Nazi leadership on a break-up of independent Poland and a ‘neutrali-
zation’ of anti-German elements through mass arrests and shootings.
Apart from that, Hitler had decided on very few concrete policies. All that
was certain at this point was that the ‘primitive population’ not immedi-
ately affected by the current cleansing operations would ‘receive no special
education’ and would be ‘suppressed in some way’.30
On 20 September, in the euphoria of an imminent victory over Poland,
Hitler approved SS proposals for the future of Poland. As Heydrich
informed his senior staff and
Einsatzgruppen
commanders in Berlin the
following day and again on 29 September, it had been decided that Poland
would effectively disappear from the map. The Polish territory now under
Nazi control would be divided into three ethnically homogenized zones:
one German, one Polish and a small Jewish ‘reservation’. The formerly
German border areas of West Prussia, the Warthegau region around
Poznań (Posen) and the extended province of Upper Silesia were to
become purely German through the expulsion of all Poles, Jews and
Gypsies, as well as through the resettlement of ethnic Germans from
those territories in Eastern Europe that had recently come under Soviet
control in fulfilment of the secret terms of the 1939 Hitler–Stalin Pact.
That task in itself was enormous: in the territories to be brought into the
Reich lived 8.9 million Poles, 603,000 Jews and a mere 600,000 ethnic
Germans. An ‘Eastern Wall’, a fortified ring of German settlements,
would surround these new German provinces, shielding them from
the ‘foreign-speaking’ Polish and Jewish zones, the latter of which was
to be established in the furthest, most eastern part of the now Nazi-
controlled area.31
Heydrich had every reason to see Hitler’s decision for a fourth partition
as a green light for further harshness in pursuing the SS’s policies of ethnic
‘unweaving’ in Poland. His apparatus accordingly began preparations for
the large-scale deportation of Poles from the incorporated territories,
to be carried out as soon as the military administration had been
passed into civilian hands.32 As a preliminary step towards the ‘solution
of the Polish problem’, the
Einsatzgruppen
were to draw up further lists of
significant leaders to be sent to concentration camps, as well as lists
of various professional and middle-class groups to be expelled into the
150
HITLER’S HANGMAN
Polish ‘rump territory’ soon to be known as the General Government.
The remaining ‘primitive Poles’ were to be gradually deported from