Letters From a Stoic (5 page)
Read Letters From a Stoic Online
Authors: Seneca
Y
OU
ask me to say what you should consider it particularly important to avoid.
My answer is this: a mass crowd.
It is something to which you cannot entrust yourself yet without risk.
I at any rate am ready to confess my own frailty in this respect.
I never come back home with quite the same moral character I went out with; something or other becomes unsettled where I had achieved internal peace, some one or other of the things I had put to flight reappears on the scene.
We who are recovering from a prolonged spiritual sickness are in the same condition as invalids who have been affected to such an extent by prolonged indisposition that they cannot once be taken out of doors without ill effects.
Associating with people in large numbers is actually harmful: there is not one of them that will not make some vice or other attractive to us, or leave us carrying the imprint of it or bedaubed all unawares with it.
And inevitably enough, the larger the size of the crowd we mingle with, the greater the danger.
But nothing is as ruinous to the character as sitting away one’s time at a show – for it is then, through the medium of entertainment, that vices creep into one with more than usual ease.
What do you take me to mean?
That I go home more selfish, more self-seeking and more self-indulgent?
Yes, and what is more, a person crueller and less humane through having been in contact with human beings.
I happened to go to one of these shows at the time of the lunch-hour interlude, expecting there to be some light and witty entertainment then, some respite for the purpose of affording people’s eyes a rest from human blood.
Far from it.
All the earlier contests were charity in comparison.
The nonsense is dispensed with now: what we have now is murder pure and
simple.
The combatants have nothing to protect them; their whole bodies are exposed to the blows; every thrust they launch gets home.
A great many spectators prefer this to the ordinary matches and even to the special, popular demand ones.
And quite naturally.
There are no helmets and no shields repelling the weapons.
What is the point of armour?
Or of skill?
All that sort of thing just makes the death slower in coming.
In the morning men are thrown to the lions and the bears: but it is the spectators they are thrown to in the lunch hour.
The spectators insist that each on killing his man shall be thrown against another to be killed in his turn; and the eventual victor is reserved by them for some other form of butchery; the only exit for the contestants is death.
Fire and steel keep the slaughter going.
And all this happens while the arena is virtually empty.
‘But he was a highway robber, he killed a man.’ And what of it?
Granted that as a murderer he deserved this punishment, what have you done, you wretched fellow, to deserve to watch it?
‘Kill him!
Flog him!
Burn him!
Why does he run at the other man’s weapon in such a cowardly way?
Why isn’t he less half-hearted about killing?
Why isn’t he a bit more enthusiastic about dying?
Whip him forward to get his wounds!
Make them each offer the other a bare breast and trade blow for blow on them.’ And when there is an interval in the show: ‘Let’s have some throats cut in the meantime, so that there’s something happening!’ Come now, I say, surely you people realize – if you realize nothing else – that bad examples have a way of recoiling on those who set them?
Give thanks to the immortal gods that the men to whom you are giving a lesson in cruelty are not in a position to profit from it.
When a mind is impressionable and has none too firm a hold on what is right, it must be rescued from the crowd: it is so easy for it to go over to the majority.
A Socrates, a
Cato or a Laelius might have been shaken in his principles by a multitude of people different from himself: such is the measure of the inability of any of us, even as we perfect our personality’s adjustment, to withstand the onset of vices when they come with such a mighty following.
A single example of extravagance or greed does a lot of harm – an intimate who leads a pampered life gradually makes one soft and flabby; a wealthy neighbour provokes cravings in one; a companion with a malicious nature tends to rub off some of his rust even on someone of an innocent and open-hearted nature – what then do you imagine the effect on a person’s character is when the assault comes from the world at large?
You must inevitably either hate or imitate the world.
But the right thing is to shun both courses: you should neither become like the bad because they are many, nor be an enemy of the many because they are unlike you.
Retire into yourself as much as you can.
Associate with people who are likely to improve you.
Welcome those whom you are capable of improving.
The process is a mutual one: men learn as they teach.
And there is no reason why any pride in advertising your talents abroad should lure you forward into the public eye, inducing you to give readings of your works or deliver lectures.
I should be glad to see you doing that if what you had to offer them was suitable for the crowd I have been talking about: but the fact is, not one of them is really capable of understanding you.
You might perhaps come across one here and there, but even they would need to be trained and developed by you to a point where they could grasp your teaching.
‘For whose benefit, then, did I learn it all?’ If it was for your own benefit that you learnt it you have no call to fear that your trouble may have been wasted.
Just to make sure that I have not been learning solely for my own benefit today, let me share with you three fine quotations I have come across, each concerned with something
like the same idea – one of them is by way of payment of the usual debt so far as this letter is concerned, and the other two you are to regard as an advance on account.
‘To me,’ says Democritus, ‘a single man is a crowd, and a crowd is a single man.’ Equally good is the answer given by the person, whoever it was (his identity is uncertain), who when asked what was the object of all the trouble he took over a piece of craftsmanship when it would never reach more than a very few people, replied: ‘A few is enough for me; so is one; and so is none.’ The third is a nice expression used by Epicurus in a letter to one of his colleagues.
‘I am writing this,’ he says, ‘not for the eyes of the many, but for yours alone: for each of us is audience enough for the other.’ Lay these up in your heart, my dear Lucilius, that you may scorn the pleasure that comes from the majority’s approval.
The many speak highly of you, but have you really any grounds for satisfaction with yourself if you are the kind of person the many understand?
Your merits should not be outward facing.
‘A
RE
you, of all people’, you write, ‘really telling me to avoid the crowd, to retire from the world and find contentment in a good conscience?
Where are those Stoic rules of yours that call on a man to die in harness?’ Come now, do I really give you the impression that I advocate a life of inactivity?
I have only buried myself away behind closed doors in order to be able to be of use to more people.
With me no day is ever whiled away at ease.
I claim a good part of my nights for study; I have no time for sleep: I just succumb to it, keeping my eyes at their work when they are heavy-lidded and exhausted from lack of rest.
I have withdrawn from affairs
as well as from society, and from my own affairs in particular: I am acting on behalf of later generations.
I am writing down a few things that may be of use to them; I am committing to writing some helpful recommendations, which might be compared to the formulae of successful medications, the effectiveness of which I have experienced in the case of my own sores, which may not have been completely cured but have at least ceased to spread.
I am pointing out to others the right path, which I have recognized only late in life, when I am worn out with my wanderings.
‘Avoid,’ I cry, ‘whatever is approved of by the mob, and things that are the gift of chance.
Whenever circumstance brings some welcome thing your way, stop in suspicion and alarm: wild animals and fish alike are taken in by this or that inviting prospect.
Do you look on them as presents given you by fortune?
They are snares.
Anyone among you who wishes to lead a secure life will do his very best to steer well wide of these baited bounties, which comprise yet another instance of the errors we miserable creatures fall into: we think these things are ours when in fact it is we who are caught.
That track leads to precipices; life on that giddy level ends in a fall.
Once, moreover, prosperity begins to carry us off course, we are no more capable even of bringing the ship to a standstill than of going down with the consolation that she has been held on her course, or of going down once and for all; fortune does not just capsize the boat: she hurls it headlong on the rocks and dashes it to pieces.
Cling, therefore, to this sound and wholesome plan of life: indulge the body just so far as suffices for good health.
It needs to be treated somewhat strictly to prevent it from being disobedient to the spirit.
Your food should appease your hunger, your drink quench your thirst, your clothing keep out the cold, your house be a protection against inclement weather.
It makes no difference whether it is built of turf or of variegated marble imported from another
country: what you have to understand is that thatch makes a person just as good a roof as gold does.
Spurn everything that is added on by way of decoration and display by unnecessary labour.
Reflect that nothing merits admiration except the spirit, the impressiveness of which prevents it from being impressed by anything.’
If these are the things I’m saying to myself, if these are the things I’m saying to future generations, don’t you think I’m doing more good than when I go into court to enter into a recognizance on someone’s behalf, or stamp my seal on a will, or lend my assistance by word or action in the Senate to some candidate for office?
Those who appear inactive are, believe me, engaged in far more important activity; they’re dealing with matters divine and human at the same moment.
But the time has come to make an end, and in accordance with the practice I’ve started to make some disbursement on this letter’s behalf.
For this I shall not draw on my own resources.
I’m still turning over the pages of Epicurus, and the following saying, one I read today, comes from him: ‘To win true freedom you must be a slave to philosophy.’ A person who surrenders and subjects himself to her doesn’t have his application deferred from day to day; he’s emancipated on the spot, the very service of philosophy being freedom.
Quite possibly you’ll be demanding to know why I’m quoting so many fine sayings from Epicurus rather than ones belonging to our own school.
But why should you think of them as belonging to Epicurus and not as common property?
Think how many poets say things that philosophers have said – or ought to have said!
Not to mention the tragedians or our native Roman drama (which has a serious element in it as well and stands halfway between comedy and tragedy), think of the quantity of brilliant lines to be found lying about in farces alone!
Think of the number of Publilius’ verses that
really ought to be spoken by actors wearing the tragic buskins instead of barefooted pantomime actors!
I’ll quote one verse of his which belongs to philosophy, and the same facet of philosophy that I was occupied with just now, a verse in which he proclaims that gifts which chance brings our way are not to be regarded as possessions:
If you pray a thing may
And it does come your way,
’Tis a long way from being your own.
I recall your expressing the same idea a good deal more happily and succinctly:
What fortune has made yours is not your own.
And I can’t pass over that even happier expression of yours:
The boon that could be given can be withdrawn.
(This being from your own stock, I’m not debiting it to your account!)
Y
OU
desire to know whether Epicurus is right in one of his letters in criticizing those who maintain that the wise man is content with himself and therefore needs no friend.
This is what Epicurus objects to in Stilbo and those
*
who believe that the supreme ideal in life is a mind devoid of feeling or as we say
impatiens
.
We are bound to involve ourselves in ambiguity if we try to express in a single word the meaning of the Greek term
apatheia
by transferring it straight into our word
impatientia
.
For it may be understood in the
opposite sense to the one we wish, with people taking it to signify the man who is unable to endure anything that goes badly for him instead of what we mean by it, the man who refuses to allow anything that goes badly for him to affect him.
Consider then whether it might not be preferable to call it a mind that is ‘invulnerable’ or ‘above all suffering’.