The Clintons' War on Women (3 page)

Who better to expose this kabuki dance in which the Bushes and Clintons aid each other’s rehabilitation while pursuing essentially the same policies when it comes to foreign war, the erosion of civil liberties, massive debt, crony capitalism, and elite deviance? As someone who spent the last forty years in the corroded rectum of the two-party system and saw the ascent of the Bushes and Clintons firsthand, I am the man to tell this story.

As one of the Republican Party’s best-known opposition researchers, I have outlined the shocking truth about the Clintons, as well as the Bushes, and their strange, mutually beneficial relationship in this tome. For the life of me, I can’t figure out how Jeb Bush awards Hillary a “Liberty Medal” for her actions and then runs against her. Civility? Or shared criminality? I shall let the reader decide.

Those who accuse me of being a Republican attack dog should understand that I will soon publish a book on Jeb Bush and the long
history of crimes by the Bush family in January of next year. The Bush-Clinton alliance proves that the right-left divide is merely a distraction by the power elite who run America and have no ideology at all, other than the ideology of money and power. The Republican and Democratic parties have sadly morphed into one large, Wall Street–financed political establishment in which no matter which party gets elected, the erosion of our civil liberties continues and we pile up more debt, levy higher taxes on working people, and engage in endless foreign wars where America’s interests are sometimes vague. The close alliance of the Bushes and Clintons shows that party is meaningless in today’s political system.

Ironically, the first journalist to report extensively on the Clintons’ wrongdoings was David Brock of the
American Spectator.
Brock interviewed Clinton’s Arkansas State Police bodyguards who talked about Clinton’s personal cocaine use, chronic infidelity, sexual assaults, and involvement with drug trafficking. The
American Spectator
stories had a profound impact. Today, Brock is a Clinton toady sucking compensation from at least three pro-Clinton front organizations. Today, Brock claims his
American Spectator
stories exposing Bill Clinton were false. He’s lying.

Brock is engaging company, highly intelligent, and, like me, a bit of a dandy. He sported a monocle, cape, and gold-headed walking stick, an affectation known only to the
National Review
’s Richard Brookhiser in the past three decades. Brock let the rumor spread he was on heroin when heroin was chic. I don’t think he was.

The success and impact of Brock’s stories led Pittsburgh millionaire Richard Mellon Scaife to fund the Arkansas Project in which a number of journalists, including Christopher Ruddy and Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, would delve deeply into the activities of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Ted Olson, who would later win the landmark case overturning a California anti-gay marriage proposition narrowly passed by the voters, represented George W. Bush in
Bush v. Gore
, and who would be named U.S. Solicitor General, was a board member of the
American Spectator Educational Foundation, which was the euphemistic name for the Arkansas Project. He is thought to have known about or played some role in the Arkansas Project. Olson’s firm, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, provided $14,000 worth of legal services, and he wrote or coauthored several articles that were paid for with Project funds. During Olson’s Senate confirmation hearing for Solicitor General, majority Republicans blocked Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy’s call for further committee inquiries on the subject of Olson’s ties to the well-funded and deep-digging Arkansas Project. The Arkansas Project journalists would focus largely on the failed Whitewater real estate development and Clinton’s hotel room sexual degradation of Paula Jones, but ultimately their investigations would lead to the broad panoply of Clinton crimes.

Ruddy, who wrote for the Scaife-owned
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette,
would pen a well-written book examining the mysterious death of Vince Foster. Ruddy would also publish a collection of Newsmax Media stories in book form, establishing the story of Danney Williams, Bill’s alleged illegitimate African American son. Ruddy would later give $1.5 million to the Clinton Foundation, which he said he did for charitable purposes.

We have carefully sifted through the research of the Arkansas Project and its many trails and offshoots. We can report that not all of the allegations against the Clintons are true. Unfortunately for Bill and Hillary, most of the allegations involving sexual assault, drug use and trafficking, financial chicanery, the use of violence by Arkansas state troopers to silence Bill’s victims, and the use of the Arkansas Economic Development Commission as a piggy bank to launder both campaign funds and graft are entirely accurate.

It is only by comparing the so-called Atwater files and the continuing opposition research conducted by the Republican National Committee after Atwater’s death with the fruits of the Arkansas Project that one can pin down the truth between Bill and Hillary Clinton.

There
is no question that some Clinton critics are excessive. There are widespread claims that the Clintons are responsible for the death of as many as eighty-three people whose knowledge stood in the way of their political ascent. Based on our investigation, the Clintons are only plausibly responsible for the deaths of half the people on this list. They are not responsible for the death of John F. Kennedy, Jr., as some researchers have claimed, though the number of individuals who are both knowledgeable of and pivotal to the Clintons’ grasp for power who die in plane crashes defies mathematical odds. For the purpose of this book, we will focus on the deaths of teenagers Don Henry and Kevin Ives, who were most likely witnesses to the rampant cocaine-trafficking going on in Arkansas where Bill Clinton backed an inept medical examiner in a sloppy cover-up and the murder of former CIA operative and later Clinton campaign security director Jerry Parks. When Clinton tried to stiff Parks on an $83,000 invoice, Parks threatened to reveal what he knew about Governor Clinton and the drug-trafficking operating out of Mena, Arkansas, which we will examine in some detail. Parks was forced off the road near his home and riddled with bullets. Murder is very much a part of the Clinton rise to power and that’s without counting the eighteen children killed in the Waco assault. Senator Arlen Specter, who headed a Senate panel investigating the Waco incident, told me that credible testimony indicated that Hillary Clinton gave the “go order” to Janet Reno and Webb Hubbell.

The second-tier hitmen for the Clintons, former conservative firebrand and left-wing entrepreneur David Brock, the overexposed Cajun James Carville, my fellow Hungarian Paul Begala, a decent fellow, and Joe Conason, will claim I am a “political dirty trickster and hitman.” I admit to having a bias, and I will let the reader decide whether the case my coauthor Robert Morrow and I lay out against Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton is valid.

Based on history, we know exactly how the Clintons and their spinning machine will react to the extraordinary and deadly accurate revelations in this book. After saying it’s all old news, they will
blame right-wing extremists for smearing them. Finally, they will seek to discredit the authors based on our partisanship and past political activities. This book, however, is not about Roger Stone or Robert Morrow; the facts outlined and carefully sourced here speak for themselves. Let the reader decide.

Speaking of dirty tricks, I can reveal that Hillary Clinton would use her own dirty trickster. Here’s what I’ve noticed: Sidney Blumenthal, who was giving Hillary political and intelligence advice that she passed on to her State Department staff and instructed them to follow. Blumenthal invented the fiction that the assault on our embassy in Benghazi was influenced by an anti-Islamic video aired in another country. Thus, Blumenthal invented the cover story that Hillary and President Barack Obama used to hide the fact that U.S. interests had been hit by al-Qaeda before the election. Blumenthal directed the dirty tricks campaign against Bill’s critics in the impeachment scandal and played a heavy role as Hillary’s henchman in the media’s effort to demonize Hillary’s sexual assault victims.

Blumenthal, the father of legendary anti-Israel radical Max Blumenthal, played so dirty against Obama at Hillary’s direction that Obama barred him from a State Department job. Sid, who once did dirty tricks for Senator Gary Hart, vilifying those who suspected his Bill Clinton–like philanderings, never disclosed to Hillary that he was being paid by corporate entities trying to make a score in postwar Libya. Blumenthal also pushed Hillary to topple Khadafi, the eccentric madman who had changed sides, providing intelligence on Islamic terrorists to the United States and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood puppet more to Max Blumenthal’s liking. Sidney was simultaneously on the payroll of the eccentric David Brock’s money-making venture,
Media Matters for America,
as well as the pro-Clinton front Correct the Record. And according to Democratic sources, he was also negotiating with American Priorities. All three are dark-money Clinton operations.

At the same time, Bill Clinton demanded that the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation pay Blumenthal ten thousand dollars
per month. Why would a charity need a hitman? His real job was to coach Hillary, serving as a backchannel spin doctor. His freelancing as a Clinton flunky on Libya created the false narrative about why Americans had given their lives—pinning their murders on the notorious anti-Islamic YouTube video.

Don’t get me wrong. Sid is wicked smart and charming company. I knew him well when he was a writer for the
New Republic
and a behind-the-scenes mover for Senator Hart’s presidential campaign, before latching on to the Clintons. An Obama White House staffer told me that the Obama camp was aware that Blumenthal was spreading the rumor that the senator from Illinois was gay, connecting him with two members of Obama’s Chicago church choir who were both viciously murdered. Blumenthal claimed to journalists that both had been former Obama lovers. He also outlined to the journalists Obama’s connections to communist Frank Marshall Davis. You can see why White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel enforced the Obama ban of an administration job for Blumenthal.

When the Clintonistas attack me as a dirty trickster, remember who they have working for them. Politics ain’t beanbag, and the Clintons play hardball, at the same time whining when hardball tactics are used to expose their prevarications, dramas, and self-dealing. While being held to the lowest possible standard—“There is no proof of our crimes”—they continue to gripe that they are being held to a higher public standard than others.

It is also Blumenthal who has convinced Hillary to abandon the Clinton Coalition of 1992 and 1996 in which the former Arkansas governor moved his party to the center and ran competitively in the South as well as in the West by appealing to moderates, swing voters, and white Democrats. Bill Clinton became president by getting white conservative and moderate Democrats to join liberals in voting democratic. Obama turned this strategy on its ear by taking more liberal positions and winning simply by maximizing turnout in the liberal base. Obama won without competing in states like Kentucky, Louisiana, Tennessee, or West Virginia, all states won by
Bill Clinton. Obama so maximized the votes of liberals that he won even while losing among independent voters. Blumenthal has counseled Hillary, choosing to move her left on gay marriage, immigration, criminal justice, voting rights, the incredibly hypocritical call for pay equality for women, and adopting anti–Wall Street rhetoric, mostly to box out Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

The path Sidney and Hillary have chosen is a narrow one with no room for error. Their strategy depends on a disproportionate level of support among women. It assumes the young, non-white, female vote is completely transferable to Hillary Clinton. Unlike Bill Clinton, Hillary will chase no swing voters and will concentrate on turning out greater numbers of the hardcore left. Any woman who is considering voting for Hillary should read this book.

I first met Bill Clinton on a street corner during a governor’s conference in New Orleans in the 1980s. I was standing with “Big Peter Kelly,” former Democrat state chairman from Connecticut and my partner in the heavy-duty lobbying firm of Black, Manafort, Stone & Kelly. He shouldn’t be confused with “Little Peter Kelly” the Democratic state chairman from California who has gone on to his maker. Kelly had raised money for Clinton and knew him well. He introduced us as the governor, who was wearing cowboy boots and a huge grin, walked toward us on a Bourbon Street full of revelers. “What are you doing out here, Governor?” I asked.

“Trawling,” said Bill Clinton. He would soon wander away to chat up a pair of girls who looked to be in their late teens. “That man will be president,” I told Kelly.

Even then, I saw a kind of hillbilly charm and insatiable appetite in Governor Clinton. As Senator Bob Kerrey of Nebraska said, Clinton is an “uncommonly good liar.”
3

The next time I saw Clinton was at President Richard Nixon’s funeral where I was invited with other Nixon friends and family as well as the former presidents and their spouses for a receiving line for the dignitaries before the president’s burial. Nixon’s casket loomed in the background.

“Don’t think I’m crazy,” my wife, Nydia, said, “but I think Clinton’s giving me the eye.” Indeed, the former president’s eyes would follow my wife anywhere in the room as he looked over the shoulder of those whose hands he was shaking.

When he came to my wife in the receiving line, he slipped her a card that said “President of the United States” and had an extension listed. “If you are ever in Washington, look me up,” he said to my Latin beauty. Mrs. Clinton wasn’t so warm. “Hello, I’m Roger Stone,” I said. “Yes, I know who you are,” she said, coldly passing me on to the next person in line.

Far from her public image, Hillary Clinton is a violent, scheming, ambitious, foul-mouthed woman with an insatiable appetite for luxury, money, and power. Hillary is also a physically violent person, famous for hitting, scratching, and throwing things at her cheating husband. She is a classic abuser of anyone who gets in the way of her drive for power.