Read The Last Man in Russia: The Struggle to Save a Dying Nation Online
Authors: Oliver Bullough
liking, I’ll be there,’ he said,
defeated at last. He wrote about this
conversation many times in later
years, as if unable to forget about it.
The fight to save the Russian people
was off. He would go along with the
K G B, do their bidding, anything to
get out of the hole he had dug for
himself. The state could encourage
abortion, spread alcoholism, sow
distrust at the heart of family life,
and he would not object.
‘That is correct,’ said Sokolov.
‘But look out, don’t even think
about fooling us.’
The next day came the telegram
from the bishop. He had a church,
just
outside
Moscow,
at
Vinogradovo. It was, he wrote, a
miracle. But he must have known it
was not. And he knew whom to
thank for it. He owed his new life to
the K G B. He overlooked the fact
that it was the K G B who had
destroyed his old life. That had been
a thousand years before. He was
their creature now. It had taken them
a while, but they had dug out the
vein of defiance that had crossed his
character, and created yet another
compliant servant for the state.
In
Nineteen Eighty-Four
Winston
Smith, the central character, is
subjected to Room 101 and has his
defiance broken, just as Father
Dmitry was subjected and broken.
After countless sessions of torture,
his interrogator tells him: ‘We are
not content with negative obedience,
nor even with the most abject
submission.
When
finally
you
surrender to us, it must be of your
own free will. We do not destroy the
heretic because he resists us: so long
as he resists us we never destroy
him. We convert him, we capture his
inner mind, we reshape him.’
That could have been written
about Father Dmitry, and so perhaps
could a later passage, when Winston
Smith finally breaks: ‘two and two
could have been three as easily as
five, if that were what was needed’.
If two and two cease to add up to
four, then everything stops having to
make sense. All you have to do is
stop thinking and you are free.
‘How easy it all was! Only
surrender,
and
everything
else
followed. It was like swimming
against a current that swept you
backwards
however
hard
you
struggled,
and
then
suddenly
deciding to turn round and go with
the current instead of opposing it,’
was how Orwell imagined it.
He wrote in
Nineteen Eighty-
Four
that the future could be
imagined as a boot stamping on a
human face for ever, and that was
what the K G B promised. They had
endless power and could torment
people for as long as they wanted.
They could torment people until they
realized
for
themselves
that
resistance was not just futile but
wrong. It is a terrifying image, and
Orwell’s
description
of
the
destruction of Winston Smith’s
character is remarkably similar to
what happened to Father Dmitry, but
here he went too far. Humans are not
machines. You cannot stamp on their
faces for ever. If you deny people
hope and trust and friendship, then
they sicken and despair. People will
not breed in captivity.
After his destruction, Winston
Smith went to a bar and drank – ‘It
was his life, his death, and his
resurrection. It was gin that sank him
into a stupor every night, and gin
that revived him in the morning’ –
alone and avoided. In the Russian
case: for gin, read vodka.
Father Dmitry now had none of
the young intellectuals around him
with whom he had so loved to
debate. They had abandoned him, or
been imprisoned, or emigrated to
Israel. He still wrote, but there was
no one to read what he produced or
to argue with his conclusions, so he
held debates with himself. He wrote
the questions and then provided the
answers: ‘There is only God. My
hope in my friends has fallen to a
minimum.’
‘The K G B agents did their
business. I was left alone, solitary. I
still continue my discussions, I look
for new techniques, but people don’t
come and the level of the discussions
has fallen,’ he wrote.
His writing became ever more
bitter,
as
he
lamented
his
abandonment.
He
wrote
long
statements to his old friends. His
justification for his actions changed
as the years passed. At first, he
admitted his guilt and begged
forgiveness. He said he was scared
of imprisonment, and that he had
been weak. Later, he tried to explain
it away. He stopped admitting his
faults. He had had no choice. He was
a priest. To break with the Church
would have meant damnation.
Breaking with them would
mean to end up outside the
hierarchy, without service,
without the sacraments, like
a member of a sect. They
said they would expel me,
that was their defence. I
would have been forced to
live and die without the
sacraments. That scared me.
That was the choice I stood
before. I did not want to
suffer, and so I rejected
everything
I
had
said,
saying
directly
and
strangely that it had been
anti-Soviet and libellous and
now I suffer all the more.
My suffering could only be
understood by a mother
who by fate was forced to
reject her own children. My
children – my books – were
despotically taken from me.
And, like an unfortunate
mother, I am scared to call
those children mine.
Reading those words I felt sorry for
him, but I no longer liked him. It
was hard to like him. Yakunin was
in prison. Ogorodnikov was in
prison. Sakharov was in internal
exile. Solzhenitsyn was in exile
abroad. But it was Father Dmitry
demanding sympathy because he
had teamed up with the K G B to
stay out of prison, done their work
for them and undermined his
friends. It did not look good, and his
spiritual children did not come back
because of it. And that made him
angry.
‘Despite everything,’ he wrote,
as if he had been wronged
somehow, ‘I love all people, I worry
about them, especially about my
own Russian people, about my own
Russia.’
He invented a counterpart, Father
Peter he called him, with whom he
could hold long imaginary debates
that confirmed his own viewpoint.
But the debates were not like the old
ones. Father Peter did not challenge
his views. Before, Father Dmitry had
insisted on tolerance and trust, but
now he ventured further up the path
of prejudice and racism the K G B
had opened for him. This fictional
counterpart asked him what he
thought about the world, and about
the faith, and about everything.
Father Dmitry conflated himself and
his country – ‘What happened to me
taught me a lot, just as what has
happened to our country should
teach us a lot’ – and he was looking
for someone to blame for the fate of
both.
Before the K G B warped him,
he had looked for solutions. He was
not interested in finding those to
blame
for
the
demographic
catastrophe, the alcoholism, the
abortion. He just wanted to unite
everyone, to end hatred and to build
a community. Now, with his
community
scattered
in
all
directions, and himself left alone, he
concentrated on finding culprits.
And he had been well taught by
the K G B. He blamed the Jews.
‘Do you really not see that they
are to blame for everything? It is not
an accident that Marx was a Jew, and
the creator of communism and
atheism. If you try just to say that,
everyone considers you an anti-
Semite,’ Father Dmitry said. It is
hard to believe that this bigot is the
same man who had so fought against
prejudice and racism just a year or
two before.
I look at the future with pessimism
The K G B gave Father Dmitry a
church in Vinogradovo, a village
outside Moscow that has now been
absorbed into the capital’s northern
suburbs. I arranged to go there with
Zoya junior, the daughter of Father
Alexander. She was the young
woman who had been dragged from
her bed by her mother, Zoya senior,
and forced to cook us lunch. She is
also, as it happens, Father Dmitry’s
goddaughter and has a letter from
him in her flat.
‘I congratulate you, Zoya, on the
birth of your namesake Zoya. Let it
be so, her name is Zoya. You will
always remember yourself in her.
God preserve you. I wish you strong
and flourishing health. Your spiritual
father Dmitry Dudko,’ the letter says
in his chaotic handwriting, above the
date 27 February 1982. It sits on a
fashionable
Japanese-style
sideboard.
By 1982, Father Dmitry was
installed in the new church, with
Alexander and Zoya senior as two of
his few remaining spiritual children.
When I asked Alexander why they
had remained with Father Dmitry, he
seemed confused by the question.
Father
Dmitry’s
televised
confession, he said, had merely been
proof of his spiritual worth. Father
Dmitry
made
no
mention
of
Alexander in his writings from the
early 1980s, although he did
describe that single disciple who had
stayed with him because ‘he doesn’t
understand anything anyway’, and I
have wondered if this was a
reference to Zoya’s father.
Be that as it may, it seemed
appropriate
to
be
visiting
Vinogradovo with her. She looks
like her father, in so far as a
beautiful woman in her twenties can
look like a middle-aged bushy-
bearded Orthodox priest. She wears
a gold cross around her neck and is
an educated and sharp representative
of Russia’s new middle class. She
works as an interior designer, drives
a smart German car, and picked me
up outside a metro station at the end
of the line.
She
had
never
visited
Vinogradovo before, or if she had
she had no memory of it. She
programmed it into her satellite
navigator,
which
squawked
directions at us as we drove out of
Moscow towards the great ring road
that sweeps traffic around the capital.
Out here on the city perimeter are
vast new developments of tower
blocks and shopping complexes. The
architecture,
despite
occasional
whimsies of towers and turrets, is
joyless. You know that, while the
walls may look clean and unspotted
now, in a couple of years they will
be as flaky and damp-stained as their
Soviet-made predecessors.
When approaching the city, these
towers meld into a solid wall, rearing
out of the virgin forest. While Russia
is shrinking and its villages are
dying, Moscow is booming. Here is,
according to some estimates, 80 per
cent of the nation’s wealth. The oil
and gas money is a fountain
showering Italian clothes, French
wine and German cars on the elite,
and offering work to everyone else
as long as they are prepared to get