Read The Twilight of the American Enlightenment Online
Authors: George Marsden
13. I am not saying, of course, that no one in the Protestant religious right addressed such issues, only that the popular calls for a return to a “Christian America” contributed to a characteristic neglect of that issue. See Conclusion, note 8.
Conclusion: Toward a More Inclusive Pluralism
1. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., “Walter Lippmann: The Intellectual v. Politics,” in
Walter Lippmann and His Times,
Marquis Childs
and James Reston, eds. (Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, 1959), 222; David Riesman,
The Lonely Crowd
(New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961 [1950]), 37.
2. The term “the noble dream” is from Peter Novick,
That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession
(Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
3. Thomas S. Kuhn,
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
4. C. S. Lewis,
Surprised by Joy: the Shape of My Early Life
(New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1995 [1955]), 201.
5. I provide much fuller argumentation for these views regarding higher education in my book
The Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
6. For mainstream America's failure to address religious diversity, see David Sehat,
The Myth of American Religious Freedom
(New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), which provides a valuable overview and interpretation of these issues.
7. A good indication of their inattention to religion is found in Daniel Roger's
The Age of Fracture
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011). The subject of how to deal with religious diversity arose only indirectly in this impressively comprehensive recounting of mainstream intellectual trends of the late twentieth century.
8. Since the 1980s, a good bit of the recent thought on the topic of religious and cultural diversity has come from Roman Catholic thinkers. Philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre, for instance, offers important perspectives on intellectual pluralism in
Three Rival Versions of Moral Inquiry
(Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1990). Richard John Neuhaus, a convert from Lutheranism in 1990, wrote much on the topic, most famously,
The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America
(Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1986). He also provided a neoconservative forum for discussing such subjects in his intellectual journal,
First Things
, founded in 1990.
Protestant conservatives as well as Catholics have made recent contributions to the discussion. A nice sampling is found in Hugh Heclo and Wilfred M. McClay, eds.,
Religion Returns to the Public Square: Faith and Policy in America
(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003). The necessities of practical politics have also forced attention to the issue. E. J. Dionne Jr. remarks in the Foreword to that work that the goal expressed by political strategist Ralph Reed, of simply asking for “a place at the table,” “represents a true triumph of religious pluralism” (p. xiv).
For an account of how nuanced views of Christians on such topics are eclipsed by simplistic populist views, see Randall J. Stephens and Karl W. Giberson,
The Anointed: Evangelical Truth in a Secular Age
(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).
9. For understanding Kuyper in his own time, see the excellent biography by James D. Bratt,
Abraham Kuyper: Modern Calvinist, Christian Democrat
(Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2013).
10. Abraham Kuyper,
Principles of Sacred Theology
, trans. J. Hendrik De Vries (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1980 [1898]), 150â159.
11. Ibid. Cf. “Common Grace in Science” (1901), in
Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader
, James D. Bratt, ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1998),
441â460.
12. Kuyper,
Principles of Sacred Theology
.
13. For another introduction to the views I am endorsing here, see James W. Skillen,
Recharging the American Experiment: Principled Pluralism for Genuine Civil Community
(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1994). For a briefer summary, see Corwin Smidt, “The Principled Pluralist Perspective,” in
Church, State and Public Justice: Five Views,
P. C. Kemeny, ed. (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2007), 127â153. The Center for Public Justice website provides an extensive bibliography on the subject at www.cp justice.org/content/christianity-politics-bibliography. Regarding the Court's recommendations for objective study of religion in
Abington Township v. Schempp
(1963), see Warren A. Nord's dis
cussion of such opinions and of the problem of the biases of such “neutrality” in
Religion and American Education: Rethinking a National Dilemma
(Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995), 236â261.
14. For the background of the epistemological differences between the American conservative Protestant commonsense heritage and Kuyper's outlook, see “The Evangelical Love Affair with Enlightenment Science” in George Marsden,
Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism
(Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1991), 122â152. The creation science movement is the best example of conservative Protestant claims that objective scientific study will support traditional interpretations of the Bible.
15. On “mediating institutions,” cf. Richard J. Mouw,
Abraham Kuyper: A Short and Personal Introduction
(Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2011)
,
42â44.
16. For example, Douglas Jacobsen and Rhonda Jacobsen, eds.,
The American University in a Postsecular Age
(New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).
17. See, for instance, John Schmalzbauer and Kathleen Mahoney, “Religion and Knowledge in the Post-Secular Academy,” in
The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society
, Philip S. Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, and Jonathan Van Antwerpen, eds. (New York: New York University Press, 2012), 215â248.
18. See David Swartz,
Moral Minority: The Evangelical Left in and Age of Conservatism
(Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012). For a nice sampling of the variety of views that have been shaping evangelical outlooks, see P. C. Kemeny, ed.,
Church, State and Public Justice: Five Views
(Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2007).
Index
Abortion, opposition to,
136
,
138
,
139
,
141
Adams, John,
xxi
Adams, John Quincy,
19
Adler, Mortimer,
47
African Americans,
63
,
64
,
67
,
152
,
174
Allport, Gordon,
40
American enlightenment,
xv
,
xx
,
127
,
149
,
168
,
172
   Â
cultural arrangements of,
xxivâxxv
   Â
importance
of,
xxiiâxxiii
   Â
inadequacies of,
175
American Revolution,
xxxiii
,
41
,
121
,
125
,
142
,
146
Anti-Catholicism,
52
,
107
,
138
,
159
,
161
Anti-intellectualism,
xxv
,
16
,
17
,
18â19
,
21
,
62
,
177
Atomic Energy Commission,
102
Augustinian Christians,
xxviii
,
165
,
166
,
170
Autonomy,
22
,
31
,
32
,
40
,
42
,
98
,
112
Ayer, A. J.,
74
Barlow, Peter: cartoon by,
121
(fig.)
Barrett, William,
71
,
72
,
73
,
75â76
Barton, David,
147
Becker, Carl,
51
Behavioral psychology,
77â78
,
81
Bellah, Robert,
94
Benedict, Ruth,
88
Bible reading,
xii
,
109
,
133
,
148
,
149
Biblical teachings,
100
,
118â119
,
146
,
168
Black Power,
67
Blake, Eugene Carlson,
111
Blue laws,
109
Brokaw, Tom,
xii
Buckley, William F.,
xviii
,
52â53
Calvinism,
91
Camus, Albert,
29
   Â
commoditization/objectification of,
26
   Â
technocracy of,
95
Carnegie Foundation,
xxxvi
Catholicism,
53
,
109
,
137
,
161
,
176
   Â
democracy and,
52
   Â
fascism and,
52
   Â
freedom and,
52
Catholics,
xviii
,
xxvii
,
18
,
97
,
110
,
139
,
152
,
159
,
161
,
178
   Â
censorship and,
89
   Â
consensus and,
63
   Â
Equal Rights Amendment and,
137
   Â
immigrant,
160
   Â
urban political power and,
62
Center for Public Justice,
170
   Â
historical,
129â130
Christian establishment,
125
,
134
Christianity,
xxvi
,
18
,
100
,
103
,
109
,
118
,
140
,
142
,
146
,
147
,
149
,
168
   Â
African American,
112
   Â
conservative,
173
   Â
education and,
99
   Â
fragmentation of,
18
   Â
Islam and,
173
   Â
modernist,
100â104
,
123
   Â
natural science and,
xxv
   Â
progressive,
124
   Â
protestant,
xxiii
,
xxiv
,
99
,
133
,
157
,
177
   Â
recognition of,
xxvi
   Â
religious right and,
19
   Â
science/thought and,
101
   Â
secular humanism and,
142
Church-state separation,
157
,
158
,
159
,
161
Civil rights,
xvii
,
59
,
63â64
,
65
Civil rights movement,
62
,
63
,
67
,
127
Civilization,
xii
,
xiii
,
xiv
,
xv
,
xvi
,
xx
,
20
,
27
,
80
   Â
democratic,
45
   Â
priorities of,
105
   Â
public conversations on,
xviii
   Â
rebuilding,
17
   Â
technological,
36
   Â
voluntary,
xxiv
Cold War,
xii
,
xvii
,
xxxiii
,
17
,
22
,
45
,
61
,
108
,
127
   Â
anxieties of,
131
   Â
privatization and,
106
Commercialism,
xxv
,
xxxviii
,
42
,
87
Communism,
xxxiv
,
xxxviii
,
108
,
115
,
130
,
133
   Â
ethnoreligious,
xi
,
156
,
160
,
174
   Â
intellectual,
139
   Â
moral,
51
   Â
virtues of,
xâxi
Como, Perry,
7
Conformity,
26
,
27
,
29
,
38
,
39
,
42
,
43
,
70
,
111
   Â
nonconformity and,
92
   Â
warnings against,
37
Consensus,
xvi
,
xix
,
xxii
,
xxiv
,
xxvi
,
xxviii
,
59
,
63
,
145
,
152
,
172
   Â
building,
46â47
,
154
,
167
   Â
cultural,
60
,
155
,
161
,
173
   Â
domestic,
108
   Â
life/politics and,
103
Conservative Catholics,
138
,
161
Conservative Christians,
162
,
171
   Â
Protestant establishment and,
150
,
161
Conservative evangelicals,
108
,
128
,
129
,
139
   Â
Equal Rights Amendment and,
137
Cultural analysis,
xiv
,
xv
,
xvii
,
xxv
,
75
,
141
Cultural crisis,
xiii
,
xvii
,
102
,
104
,
129
,
145
Cultural revolution,
xvi
,
xvii
,
10
Culture,
xii
,
xv
,
xxii
,
xxvi
,
xxxvii
,
81
,
95
,
105
,
139
,
156
   Â
bureaucratic,
93
   Â
class,
xxv
   Â
commercial,
150
   Â
economic,
121
   Â
emerging,
94
   Â
heart of,
5
   Â
homogenized,
8
   Â
levels of,
15
   Â
liberal,
44
,
51
,
92
,
120
,
171
,
174
   Â
mainstream,
84
,
98
,
99
,
101
,
152
,
158
,
162
,
174
,
177
   Â
mass,
xiii
,
7â16
,
19
,
21
,
127
   Â
modern,
14
,
23
,
24
,
75
,
119
   Â
religion and,
151
,
162
,
163
   Â
shared,
14
   Â
television and,
7
   Â
youth,
x
Culture wars,
xxvi
,
16
,
125
,
140
,
145
,
162
,
170
,
178
   Â
politics of,
128
   Â
stereotypes of,
176
Curtis, Tony,
12
Dahl, Robert,
61