The Dictionary of Dreams

Ten Thousand Dreams Interpreted

`Ìn a dream, in a vision of the night, when

deep sleep falleth upon men, in slumberings upon

the bed; then he openeth the ears of men and

sealeth their instruction that he may withdraw

man from his purpose, and hide pride from man.''

--Job xxxiii., 15.

PREFACE.

``Dreams are rudiments of the great state to come.

We dream what is about to happen.''--BAILEY,

The Bible, as well as other great books of historical and

revealed religion, shows traces of a general and substantial

belief in dreams. Plato, Goethe, Shakespeare and Napoleon

assigned to certain dreams prophetic value. Joseph saw

eleven stars of the Zodiac bow to himself, the twelfth star.

The famine of Egypt was revealed by a vision of fat and lean cattle.

The parents of Christ were warned of the cruel edict of Herod,

and fled with the Divine Child into Egypt.

Pilate's wife, through the influence of a dream, advised her husband to have nothing to do with the conviction of Christ. But the gross materialism of the day laughed at dreams, as it echoed the voice and verdict of the multitude, ``Crucify the Spirit, but let the flesh live.''

Barabbas, the robber, was set at liberty.

The ultimatum of all human decrees and wisdom is to gratify

the passions of the flesh at the expense of the spirit.

The prophets and those who have stood nearest the fountain

of universal knowledge used dreams with more frequency than

any other mode of divination.

Profane, as well as sacred, history is threaded with incidents

of dream prophecy. Ancient history relates that Gennadius

was convinced of the immortality of his soul by conversing

with an apparition in his dream.

Through the dream of Cecilia Metella, the wife of a Consul, the Roman Senate was induced to order the temple of Juno Sospita rebuilt.

The Emperor Marcian dreamed he saw the bow of the Hunnish conqueror

break on the same night that Attila died.

Plutarch relates how Augustus, while ill, through the dream

of a friend, was persuaded to leave his tent, which a few hours

after was captured by the enemy, and the bed whereon he had lain

was pierced with the enemies' swords.

If Julius Caesar had been less incredulous about dreams he would

have listened to the warning which Calpurnia, his wife,

received in a dream.

Croesus saw his son killed in a dream.

Petrarch saw his beloved Laura, in a dream, on the day she died,

after which he wrote his beautiful poem, ``The Triumph of Death.''

Cicero relates the story of two traveling Arcadians who went to

different lodgings--one to an inn, and the other to a private house.

During the night the latter dreamed that his friend was begging for help.

The dreamer awoke; but, thinking the matter unworthy of notice, went to sleep again. The second time he dreamed his friend appeared, saying it would be too late, for he had already been murdered and his body hid in a cart, under manure. The cart was afterward sought for and the body found.

Cicero also wrote, `Ìf the gods love men they will certainly disclose their purposes to them in sleep.''

Chrysippus wrote a volume on dreams as divine portent.

He refers to the skilled interpretations of dreams as a true divination; but adds that, like all other arts in which men have to proceed on conjecture and on artificial rules, it is not infallible.

Plato concurred in the general idea prevailing in his day,

that there were divine manifestations to the soul in sleep.

Condorcet thought and wrote with greater fluency in his dreams

than in waking life.

Tartini, a distinguished violinist, composed his ``Devil's Sonata'

under the inspiration of a dream. Coleridge, through dream influence, composed his ``Kubla Khan.'

The writers of Greek and Latin classics relate many instances

of dream experiences. Homer accorded to some dreams divine origin.

During the third and fourth centuries, the supernatural origin

of dreams was so generally accepted that the fathers, relying upon

the classics and the Bible as authority, made this belief a doctrine of the Christian Church.

Synesius placed dreaming above all methods of divining the future;

he thought it the surest, and open to the poor and rich alike.

Aristotle wrote: ``There is a divination concerning some things

in dreams not incredible.'' Camille Flammarion, in his great book

on ``Premonitory Dreams and Divination of the Future,'' says:

`Ì do not hesitate to affirm at the outset that occurrence of dreams foretelling future events with accuracy must be accepted as certain.''

Joan of Arc predicted her death.

Cazotte, the French philosopher and transcendentalist, warned Condorcet against the manner of his death.

People dream now, the same as they did in medieval and ancient times.

The following excerpt from ``The Unknown,''[1] a recent book

by Flammarion, the French astronomer, supplemented with a few

of my own thoughts and collections, will answer the purposes

intended for this book.

[1] ``From `The Unknown.' Published by Harper & Brothers Copyright, 1900, by Camille Flammarion.''

``We may see without eyes and hear without ears, not by unnatural excitement of our sense of vision or of hearing, for these accounts prove the contrary, but by some interior sense, psychic and mental.

``The soul, by its interior vision, may see not only what is

passing at a great distance, but it may also know in advance

what is to happen in the future. The future exists potentially,

determined by causes which bring to pass successive events.

``POSITIVE OBSERVATION PROVES THE EXISTENCE OF A PSYCHIC WORLD,

as real as the world known to our physical senses.

`Ànd now, because the soul acts at a distance by some power that belongs to it, are we authorized to conclude that it exists as something real, and that it is not the result of functions of the brain?

``Does light really exist?

``Does heat exist?

``Does sound exist?

``No.

``They are only manifestations produced by movement.

``What we call light is a sensation produced upon our optic nerve

by the vibrations of ether, comprising between 400 and 756 trillions per second, undulations that are themselves very obscure.

``What we call heat is a sensation produced by vibrations between 350

and and{sic} 600 trillions.

``The sun lights up space, as much at midnight as at midday.

Its temperature is nearly 270 degrees below zero.

``What we call sound is a sensation produced upon our auditory nerve by silent vibrations of the air, themselves comprising between 32,000

and 36,000 a second.

. . . . . .

``Very many scientific terms represent only results, not causes.

``The soul may be in the same case.

``The observations given in this work, the sensations, the impressions, the visions, things heard, etc., may indicate physical effects produced without the brain.

``Yes, no doubt, but it does not seem so.

``Let us examine one instance.

``Turn back to page 156.@@@

`À young woman, adored by her husband, dies at Moscow. Her father-in-law, at Pulkowo, near St. Petersburg, saw her that same hour by his side.

She walked with him along the street; then she disappeared.

Surprised, startled, and terrified, he telegraphed to his son,

and learned both the sickness and the death of his daughter-in-law.

``We are absolutely obliged to admit that SOMETHING emanated

from the dying woman and touched her father-in-law. This

thing unknown
may have been an ethereal movement,

as in the case of light, and may have been only an effect,

a product, a result; but this effect must have had a cause,

and this cause evidently proceeded from the woman who was dying.

Can the constitution of the brain explain this projection?

I do not think that any anatomist or physiologist will give

this question an affirmative answer. One feels that there is

a force unknown, proceeding, not from our physical organization,

but from that in us which can think.

``Take another example (see page 57).@@@

`À lady in her own house hears a voice singing.

It is the voice of a friend now in a convent, and she faints,

because she is sure it is the voice of the dead.

At the same moment that friend does really die, twenty miles

away from her.

``Does not this give us the impression that one soul holds

communication with another?

``Here is another example (page 163):@@@

``The wife of a captain who has gone out to the Indian mutiny sees one night her husband standing before her with his hands pressed to his breast, and a look of suffering on his face. The agitation that she feels convinces her that he is either killed or badly wounded. It was November 14th.

The War Office subsequently publishes his death as having taken place on November 15th. She endeavors to have the true date ascertained.

The War Office was wrong. He died on the 14th.

`À child six years old stops in the middle of his play and

cries out, frightened: ``Mamma, I have seen Mamma.'' At that

moment his mother was dying far away from him (page 124).@@@

`À young girl at a ball stops short in the middle of a dance and cries, bursting into tears. `My father is dead; I have just seen him.'

At that moment her father died. She did not even know he was ill.

`Àll these things present themselves to us as indicating

not physiological operations of one brain acting on another,

but psychic actions of spirit upon spirit. We feel that they

indicate to us some power unknown.

``No doubt it is difficult to apportion what belongs to the spirit,

the soul, and what belongs to the brain. We can only let ourselves

be guided in our judgment and our appreciations by the same

feeling that is created in us by the discussion of phenomena.

This is how all science has been started. Well, and does not every

one feel that we have here to do with manifestations from beings

capable of thought, and not with material physiological facts only?

``This impression is superabundantly confirmed by investigation concerning the unknown faculties of the soul, when active in dreams and somnambulism.

`À brother learns the death of his young sister by a terrible nightmare.

`À young girl sees beforehand, in a dream, the man whom she will marry.

`À mother sees her child lying in a road, covered with blood.

`À lady goes, in a dream, to visit her husband on a distant steamer, and her husband really receives this visit, which is seen by a third person.

`À magnetized lady sees and describes the interior of the body

of her dying mother; what she said is confirmed by the autopsy.

`À gentleman sees, in a dream, a lady whom he knows arriving at night in a railroad station, her journey having been undertaken suddenly.

`À magistrate sees three years in advance the commission of a crime, down to its smallest details.

``Several persons report that they have seen towns and landscapes

before they ever visited them, and have seen themselves in situations in which they found themselves long after.

`À mother hears her daughter announce her intended marriage six months before it has been thought of.

``Frequent cases of death are foretold with precision.

`À theft is seen by a somnambulist, and the execution of

the criminal is foretold.

`À young girl sees her fiance', or an intimate friend dying

(these are frequent cases),
etc.

`Àll these show unknown faculties in the soul. Such at least

is my own impression. It seems to me that we cannot reasonably

attribute the prevision of the future and mental sight to a nervous

action of the brain.

`Ì think we must either deny these facts or admit that they must

have had an intellectual and spiritual cause of the psychic order,

and I recommend sceptics who do not desire to be convinced, to deny

them outright; to treat them as illusions and cases of a fortuitous

coincidence of circumstances. They will find this easier.

Uncompromising deniers of facts, rebels against evidence,

may be all the more positive, and may declare that the writers

of these extraordinary narratives are persons fond of a joke,

who have written them to hoax me, and that there have been persons

in all ages who have done the same thing to mystify thinkers