Read The Last Man in Russia: The Struggle to Save a Dying Nation Online
Authors: Oliver Bullough
‘It was an act of blasphemy
because Putin is not a true believer,
and now the belt is miraculously
causing the nation to rise up,’ he
said. ‘Whatever Putin does now it is
too late. Business is opposed to him,
the young people too. Trying to
suffocate the movement and turn us
into North Korea is just stupid.’
His delight in what had happened
was overpowering. He laughed and
nodded constantly, convinced that
Putin had succeeded in defeating
himself. He even seemed amused by
the thought that he could be arrested
once more, and sent back to the
camps.
When Yakunin was sent to prison in
1981, he rode in a prison train,
guarded and shackled. When I took
the same line in 2012, I had one of
the luxurious berths favoured by
richer Russians and foreigners. I had
been forced to change my ticket at
the last minute, and all the cheapest
berths were gone, meaning I was
sharing a compartment with a well-
tanned family from one of the oil
towns
of
Siberia.
They were
returning home from holiday in
Italy,
where
the
weather
had
apparently been fantastic.
The
father
of
the
family
discussed
sport
with
great
persistence, but I managed to fall
asleep anyway and in the morning
they were gone, their places taken by
two brunettes and a blonde from
Nizhny Novgorod. They were off to
a training seminar organized by their
bank, but their conversation centred
on a serial killer on the prowl in their
hometown. He prefers blondes, said
the blonde.
This was the famous Trans-
Siberian Mainline, and our train was
heading for Beijing. My fellow
passengers included two French
women, a Brazilian man in tight
shorts
and
at
least
a
dozen
Americans. Everyone disembarked
at every stop and swarmed round the
women selling pies, beer and soft
drinks. The Americans were staying
on the train all the way to China, a
journey that would take them a
week. I, however, reached the city of
Perm that evening, swung my bag
on to my shoulder and climbed
down on to the platform.
When Yakunin travelled from
Perm to his camp, he was locked in a
metal cage in the back of a truck.
Once again I had a more comfortable
time, sitting in the front seat of a
four-wheel-drive truck driven by
Alexander
Ogaryshev,
a
local
opposition
politician
who
had
volunteered to show me around. We
pulled out of Perm through heavy
traffic and over the River Kama, a
tributary to the Volga, and into the
forest that stretches from here for
thousands of kilometres to the north
and east.
Alexander is a Perm native who
trained as a lawyer at the interior
ministry’s
academy
in
Nizhny
Novgorod.
That
is
an
elite
institution, and graduating should
have led to a highly lucrative
position in the police, where income
from bribes can exceed official
salaries many times over. He said,
however, that he had been so
revolted by the corruption, and the
difference between the high ideals
preached at the academy and actual
police practice, that he quit and went
into business with some friends.
‘The corruption was total. They
were just there to serve their own
interests. Who paid more was all
they cared about,’ he had said a
couple of days before we drove into
the forest, as we sat over coffee.
‘If I went to the station, they
were all drinking. They respected
nothing. The police should serve the
state, they should want to be honest
and to help people. They should not
be serving just for the chance to
make money.’
He and his friends owned a
network
of
casinos
until
the
government made casinos illegal in
2009. Casinos still exist, of course,
and there was one disguised as an
internet café opposite my hotel, but
now they are run by corrupt officials
who are immune to the law.
Alexander and his friends moved
into the restaurant business in
response, and he now owned three
venues across Perm. We sat in one
of them while he told me about
winter 2011–12. He had driven all
the way to Moscow to take part in
the protests, a journey of more than
1,000 kilometres. On arriving there
on 10 December, he went straight to
Bolotnaya Square without having
slept.
‘Our hope was that finally
something could be changed in the
country. Previously people just
wanted to leave. I had this sense
there that we could change things. I
can sell up and leave at any time. I
have a friend in Germany. For the
first time, however, there was hope
that we could change things, instead
of this apathy. We need to keep this
going. The protest was like a great
unification. There were all these
creative people with slogans that
they invented themselves. The most
creative
people
support
the
opposition, it was wonderful.’
The Perm region itself did not
see any particular protests against
United Russia’s election. That may
be because the party gained only 36
per cent there, which was down
among the lowest levels in Russia, so
there was not much to protest
against.
The lack of protests is unlikely to
be because Perm residents are too
cynical and apathetic to take action,
however. They are descended from
generations of exiles, and it has been
a favoured dumping ground for the
Russian
government’s
unwanted
citizens for generations. Elmira
Polubesova, a fifty-three-year-old
activist from a liberal pressure group
called Solidarity whom we were
sitting with, boasted that Perm’s
tradition of exile made it an island of
freedom in an oppressive sea.
‘Judging by my own children,
they have a chance to go to Canada
but they say they want to stay here,
they want to create conditions for a
family, to change things. In Soviet
times it was prestigious to be
employed by someone, to have
worked somewhere for forty years.
The situation was such that you had
to stay put, people were scared to
leave or to speak out because they
could lose their pension. But now
people have changed, they work for
themselves. The generation that was
repressed is dying. Even I did not
experience the repression that my
mother had, and when people have
not been personally affected they are
not scared to decide things for
themselves.’
A ten-minute drive from the
restaurant in Alexander’s four-
wheel-drive was the puppet theatre, a
shabby beige building closed for the
summer. In the 1930s it had a
different function: a detention centre
for those suspected of counter-
revolutionary crimes. In almost any
other Russian city, its past would
have been forgotten. In Perm,
however, a group of local activists
had
persuaded
the
theatre’s
management to let them set up a
small museum round the back.
Alexander Kalikh, a lean middle-
aged man, is in charge of the project
and he had agreed to show us
around.
We walked across the courtyard
to a brick annexe, opened a steel
door
and
ducked
inside.
Incongruously, puppets hung on the
walls alongside the displays about
the repressions of the Stalin years.
This was still a theatre after all.
Kalikh said he was planning to
reopen a bricked-up window that
had looked on to the courtyard, and
through which prisoners had once
spoken to their relatives.
‘No one kept here was aware that
they would be taken to be shot but
many people still alive remember
seeing their relatives for the last time
through that window.’
A few officials were even
assisting him in his efforts to
commemorate the past, he said,
including
the
Federal
Prisons
Service, which had provided a
genuine grille from an old window.
He speculated that officials from the
Service might have a guilt complex
through
working
for
the
organization that had imprisoned so
many people.
‘The FSB is different, however.
They haven’t helped us in twenty
years, they must have an order not
to. The local government does help
us a little, but that’s because this is
Perm, you know, it would not
happen in other places.’
Schoolchildren now come to the
building not just for the puppet
performances, but to learn about
how the secret police arrested people
on token charges, penned them up
and then shot them. The museum has
lists of the people who were kept
here, and can always find people
who lived on the same street as the
visiting children.
‘We can show them the route the
prisoners took to get here. That
means for young people history is
before their eyes. They have to sense
that all this happened close to them,
that
it
was
not
somewhere
completely different. And we can
show them that the times have not
really
changed.
Look
at
the
similarities between Stalin and Putin,
now there has been a whole series of
repressive reforms: to N G Os, to
libel, to protest. Whose methods are
these? Your rights mean nothing, we
do not even know what will happen
in a year.’
On the way out, he pointed to a
poster on the wall with a quote from
the poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko that
loosely translates as ‘If we forget,
we are cattle. If we remember, we’re
a nation.’ As a slogan, it is defiant
and proud. If you surrender to
officials’ demands to forget their
victims, you are collaborating in the
crime.
The Perm region was home to
three of the last camps for political
prisoners in the Soviet Union. Perm-
35, Perm-36 and Perm-37 were
nicknamed the Perm triangle. Perm
was a major centre of the weapons
industry in Soviet times and was
thus closed to foreigners, which
made it a good place to keep
dissidents.
Its
glorious
weapon-building
past is attested to by a gigantic Order
of Lenin in the centre of town,
awarded in 1971 for its ‘great
successes in the development of
industrial production’. The fruits of
that production are on show in a
museum on the outskirts. Visitors
can see everything from a tsarist-era
cannon to a ballistic missile that
could fly 9,600 kilometres and
deliver a 0.6-megaton atomic device.
More powerful missiles have been
made since, but were not on display.
Alexander Ogaryshev and I were
on our way to Perm-36. Perm-35
and Perm-37 (where Yakunin served
his term) still operate as prisons and
are thus closed to visitors. Perm-36,
however, the last point in the
triangle, was abandoned. Former
prisoners and members of Memorial,
a charity devoted to historical
research and human rights, took it