Read The Last Man in Russia: The Struggle to Save a Dying Nation Online
Authors: Oliver Bullough
of those in Germany, although the
Soviet Union had some of the richest
land in the world.
From a cultural and social
perspective, things were even worse.
Or
so
I
heard
from Vasily
Germangenovich
Shpinkov,
universally
known
as
Germangenovich, from the village of
Kazashchina.
Kazashchina
is
a
couple of kilometres to the west of
Berezina. On my way to see him, I
walked past a stork’s nest, a dense
umbrella of sticks. Storks are
supposed to bring good luck, but
this one did not seem to have helped
the village. Almost every house was
boarded up or rotting.
Germangenovich was born in
1926, making him four years Father
Dmitry’s junior. If he was busy
when I arrived, he showed no sign
of it, since he sat me down, squeezed
on to the seat next to me and began
to talk as if he had been waiting for
me his whole life.
He had a strange twisted nose,
scarred in the way I imagine a
serious explosion would scar it. His
grey hair was thick but chaotic. His
eyes were bright. I had plenty of
time to examine him since he
believed in the bigger picture. His
life story started with Peter the
Great’s victory over the Swedes at
Poltava. That was in 1709.
He was a Cossack and proud of
it, and he pointed out to me his
reproduction above the door of a
painting in which Cossacks are
shown writing a rude letter to the
Turkish sultan. He wanted me to
know that the tsars had been good
people, and told me so at length. I
had to write it all down, since he
waited for me to do so after every
sentence.
As a result, my notebook is full
of pages of information on tsaristera
serfs, when peasants were tied to
their village and forced to give their
labour to their lord for three days a
week.
‘In 1931, Stalin brought in a
second serfdom. He took the land,
he took the livestock and he left the
people with just a quarter of a
hectare. And people did not have to
work only three days a week for
their masters like under the old
system, but all the time, plus the
churches
and
priests
were
destroyed.’
He was talking directly into my
face, so I had a close view of his
nose. His eyes were alive either side
of it.
‘I remember how they forced
people into the collective farm. The
chairman of the village council sat at
a table with a pistol which he said
was for the enemies of the people,
who were those who did not want to
join the collective farm. I was six
years old and was up on the stove.’
He gestured to the huge flat-
topped stove that dominated the
room. Traditional peasant houses
such as this one are built around the
stove. It projects into every room
and keeps them warm in the
wintertime. In very cold weather, the
family sleeps on top.
When the chairman had finished
his speech and everyone shouted
‘Praise
Stalin,
praise
the
revolution!’,
Germangenovich’s
grandmother told them they were all
fools, that nothing good would come
of it; that it was not for life, it was
for death. Her curses made no
difference. The government took
over all the barns, and all the
livestock. It even took people’s
wedding rings, the state’s desire for
currency was so strong.
‘We had to give our cow to the
state, and my mother got two and a
half metres of cloth, which she used
to make shirts for my father. That
was the payment for our cow: a
couple of shirts. When my father
took the horse to the collective farm,
we cried, we children. He knew that
the horse would die, because it
would have no master, no one would
look after it. Our horse went to the
common barn, and they took our
land, and this is where the starvation
came from.’
There were seven people in his
family: his parents, him, his three
siblings and his grandmother. They
ate herbs and weeds to stave off
hunger. His father did not have the
money to buy an exercise book, so
they went semi-naked and barefoot
to their lessons without anything to
write in.
‘The children were weak, many
could not go to school. They were
naked and hungry, and refused to
leave the house. How can you walk
when your legs won’t move? At
school, they gave out bread. They
had a list, and they divided children
up. The poorest got bread, but me
and my brother were so-called
middle peasants so we got nothing.’
Middle peasants were the group
of people between kulaks – the
supposedly rich oppressors, who
were often ordinary farmers whose
hard work had allowed them to own
slightly more than their neighbours,
and who were sent off to die in
Siberia and the north – and the
Bolsheviks’ favoured poor peasants.
The classifications were based on
a report that Lenin wrote in the late
nineteenth century. He was a
committed Marxist, and saw the laws
of class struggle all around him. That
led him to the erroneous conclusion
that peasants were dividing into
classes – kulak, middle and poor –
thanks to the government’s abolition
of serfdom and various other limited
agricultural reforms.
In fact, peasants distributed their
land afresh every year, with families
receiving a share proportional to the
number of people in their household.
That imposed equality and the
differences Lenin observed were
transient
developments
brought
about by temporary increases in
some families’ sizes that would be
erased when young men left home
or old men died.
The peasants he labelled as rich
were rarely rich enough to employ
labour, and in any case distrusted the
habits required to get ahead in
business.
Besides,
as
Olga
Semyonova Tian-Shanskaia noted,
any surplus wealth tended to go on
vodka, which had the habit of
returning the relatively rich to the
ranks of the poor once more.
Even if stratification into classes
did occur, it was wiped out by the
revolution
and
subsequent
disturbances. Peasants stole their rich
landlords’ belongings, then the
Bolsheviks stole what was left. There
were no kulaks, no middle peasants
and no poor peasants. There were
just peasants, and all of them were in
dire condition.
For the Bolsheviks, however,
what Lenin wrote was true, and the
communist government set targets
for how many kulaks needed to be
‘dekulakized’ so as to establish
fairness in the countryside. In June
1931 alone, 101,184 families were
resettled from their homes to remote
areas. The population of the Narym
territory in Siberia increased from
120,000 to 300,000 in less than
three months as the kulaks poured
in, with no allowances made to feed
the new arrivals in the long Siberian
winter.
The kulaks were often the
peasants with the best handicraft
skills. With their departure, the
villages lost their most skilled and
accomplished residents, as well as
much of their livestock, since many
peasants preferred to slaughter their
animals rather than hand them over
to the state. Lacking animals to work
the land or supply manure for
fertilizer, the peasants’ grain crops
collapsed,
while
grain
seizures
continued. That caused a new
famine.
Germangenovich cut a piece off
the loaf of bread on the sideboard –
9 centimetres square, a bit bigger
than a packet of cigarettes, though
not as deep. That was the ration that
he did not get. The bread was on a
tray in school, and only the poor
peasant children got any.
‘My brother asked for some and
they refused him. So he just grabbed
two bits of bread off the tray and
ran. While they chased him, he ate
one bit and the second he hid under
his shirt and gave to me. That was a
true brother.’
The government moved many of
the
villagers
a
few
hundred
kilometres into Ukraine, where there
would apparently be work and food.
They walked into the houses
assigned to them, he said, to find the
tables laid and the beds made. The
Ukrainians had all died of hunger,
and their fields were unworked.
In the winter of 1932–3, the
death rate in some parts of Ukraine
was thirteen times higher than
normal. Russia was better off, but
only just. In its worst-affected parts
the death rate was nine times higher
than normal.
In 1932–3, somewhere between
5 and 6 million people died, making
it the worst single famine of the
century until China surpassed it in
1958. Grain production that year
was around 60 million tonnes, but
the five-year plan demanded 106
million tonnes and the plan could not
be changed, so grain seizures by
officials
continued
despite
the
evidence of starvation. Desperate
peasants fled the villages for the
towns, where rations were better.
The
government,
which
had
abolished internal passports with the
revolution, sent the peasants back to
their homes and reintroduced travel
permits. Now only town-dwellers
would have the right to live in
towns, and peasants would be tied to
the
land
by
their
lack
of
documentation.
For
Germangenovich, it was serfdom
come again.
Stalin’s lack of sympathy for the
starving peasants, whom he referred
to as ‘peasants’ in inverted commas
as if to accuse them of being
impostors, was shown when, in a
private telegram, he said they were
Polish agents seeking to blacken the
Soviet Union’s name. Ukrainian
officials followed his lead and said
the peasants were starving because
they were lazy. Some 21,000 top
officials, meanwhile, had access to
special shops in the cities where
delicacies were still available. Closed
Shop No. 1 served the Moscow elite.
While officials ate caviar, the boy
Germangenovich was killing vermin
to try to stop them eating the grain
that was left.
‘We were ordered to kill mice,
and we got given a book if we
brought in a hundred mouse tails. It
was a plague of mice,’ he said. ‘That
is how we lived. Up to the war.’
On 22 June 1941, Nazi Germany
attacked the Soviet Union, finding
the
Russian
troops
totally
unprepared. The invaders’ advance
was quick and devastating. By 17
August, they had seized Berezina.
The same disregard for logic that
had led the Bolsheviks to starve
millions of peasants had also
persuaded them to purge the highest
ranks of the army, leaving the
officers untrained and scared to take
the initiative.
The Germans took whole armies
of Soviet troops prisoner, of whom
2.8 million would be dead by early
1942. It was one of the most
spectacular military disasters in
history, and it exposed Father
Dmitry and Germangenovich to the
German army and an entirely