Read SS Brotherhood of the Bell: The Nazis’ Incredible Secret Technology Online
Authors: Joseph P. Farrell
And the SS murdered its own to keep it a secret.
It stands to reason, then, that no personage, no matter how lofty, would be secure from a similar fate, if he threatened to expose the existence of such a technology or to expose the groups continuing to develop it in the utmost occulted secrecy.
Igor Witkowski’s Sketch of the Bell
(Courtesy Igor Witkowski’s
The Truth About the Wunderwaffe)
“Myron’s” Sketch of the Kecksburg Acorn,Allegedly Taken to Wright Patterson Air Force Base where heglimpsed it.
1
S.M. Shires,
Mercuric Pyro-Antimonate,
www.geocities.com/smshires.geo/
>, p. 1.
2
Prof. Dr. Walther Gerlach, “The Transmutation of Mercury into Gold, ,”
Frankfurter Zeiting,
evening edition, Friday, July 18, 1924. My translation from the German. Emphasis added.
3
Q.v. chapter 5.
4
Joseph P. Farrell,
Reich of the Black Sun
(Kempton, Illinois: Adventures Unlimited Press, 2004), p. 335.
5
The reason that an atom bomb is required as a “trigger” in a conventional hydrogen bomb is that, according to standard nuclear and thermonuclear theory, the enormous heat and pressures required to initiate fusion reactions can only be achieved by an atom bomb, which heats the atoms of deuterium and tritium – heavy hydrogen isotopes with one and two extra neutrons in their nuclei respectively – with enough energy to cause enough of them to collide and fuse into helium atoms, with a corresponding tremendous explosive release of energy and burst of neutrons. The neutrons which are not required by the helium atom are “kicked out” to form a deadly, but short-lived radiation. Thus,
most
of the long-lived radiation in a conventional hydrogen bomb comes not from the fusion reaction, but from the fission reaction of the atomic bomb that triggers the hydrogen bomb.
6
Sam Cohen, “The Dove of War,”
National Review
(December 17, 1995, 56-58,76), p. 56.
7
Ibid.
8
Ibid.
9
Sam Cohen, “The Dove of War,” p. 56.,emphasis added.
10
I.e., the energy of the explosive “shock” or pressure wave.
11
Sam Cohen, “The Dove of War,” p. 56.
12
Ibid.
13
Ibid.
14
Sam Cohen, “The Dove of War,” p. 57, emphasis added.
15
Ibid., p. 97.
16
Ibid.
17
Ibid.
18
Q.v. my
Reich of the Black Sun,
chapter 4.
19
The largest hydrogen bomb ever tested was done by the Soviet Union, which tested a deliverable weapon with a yield of 67 megatons in 1962!
20
For this story, see Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan’s
The Mini-NukeConspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), ISBN 0-670-86925-2.
21
Hournam and McQuillan note that Russian spy satellite kept a busy eye on (West) Germany’s version of Area 51, a secret preserve in Zaire, central Africa, run by the German firm OTRAG (Orbital Transport and Rockets, AG, a (West) German company involved in cruise missile research. According to Hounam and McQuillan, the Russians also knew a great deal about the extent of South Africa’s nuclear bomb program. “This may,” they observe, “be connected with a spy swap that took place in 1969 between Moscow and Bonn. According to Chinese (!) intelligence sources, several West Germans held in the Soviet Union were swapped with Soviet spy Victor Loginov. The puzzling aspect of this is that Loginov had been caught spying in South Africa and had been secretly handed over to the West Germans.”(p. 141). Consequently, once again, the finger points back to West Germany, and not Israel, as the real technological broker for South Africa’s nuclear bomb development. The implication is clear: West Germany was using South Africa as a proxy state to develop its own nuclear arsenal, maintaining a strict adherence to the letter, while simultaneously circumventing the spirit of its NATO treaty obligations. This is not to cast aspersions on the West German government for doing so, for no power in its position would rationally rely on the good graces of its former enemies, France, Great Britain, the United States, or the Soviet Union, in the threat of a war or nuclear exchange between East and West.
22
Sverdlovsk has been renamed to its pre-revolutionary name of Ekaterinburg. This is the same city where Tsar Nicholas, Tsaritsa Alexandra and their family were murdered by the Bolsheviks.
23
Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan,
The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy:Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), p. 37.
24
Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan,
The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), p. 58.
25
Ibid., p. 59.
26
Ibid., p. 60. This amount of material seems excessively large for such an allegedly rare and costly substance to produce, and is one reason many official atomic energy agencies in the West dismissed the Red Mercury Legend as a hoax or as deliberate Russian disinformation.
27
Ibid.
28
Ibid.
29
Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan,
The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), p.62.
30
Ibid., p. 64.
31
Hounam and McQuillan also report that a substance reported to be Red Mercury was analyzed by the Bulgarians and found to be an amalgam of mercury and tellurium.(p. 112)
32
The year 1968 is significant, since this is the first mention in western literature of the same compound, being investigated by explosives manufacturer DuPont.
33
Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan,
The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), p.. 64, emphasis added.
34
Another form of “salting” appeared to be a compound of mercury antimony oxide “which came with a stick of uranium down the middle.” (Ibid., p. 120) In regard to the topic of “salting”, one South African researcher, in response to all the claims being made for the substance, concluded that without the presence of some radioactive isotope, “if (red mercury) is used in nuclear weapons at all, it may only be as a carrier for radioactive isotopes….Without enriched uranium or plutonium, red mercury remains only a toxic hazard.” (Ibid., p. 126).
35
Peter Hounam and Steve McQuillan,
The Mini-Nuke Conspiracy: Mandela’s Nuclear Nightmare
(Viking: 1995), p. 127.
36
Ibid., note 1, p. 127.
37
See my
Reich of the Black Sun,
pp. 80-86.
38
“A-Waffe”, the wording again is not “Atombombe” but only
A-waffe
, or “A-weapon”.
39
Citing Meyer and Mehner,
Das Geheimnis der deutschen Atombombe,
p.83.
40
Reich of the Black Sun,
pp. 83-85, emphasis in the original.
41
Q.v.
Reich of the Black Sun,
p. 85.
42
Reich of the Black Sun,
p. 85
43
The characterization of Heisenberg’s notorious “Leipzig” experimental reactors as “failures” is another legacy and component of the Allied Legend. The fact that the reactors caught fire and were barely able to be put out, in a kind of proto-Chernobyl meltdown, is based on the assumption that Heisenberg was
attempting
to construct a conventional reactor. But as a close examination of the experiments and aims he was trying to achieve will demonstrate, Heisenberg, like his Manhattan Project counterparts, was “tickling the dragon’s tail” and attempting to measure neutron cross-sections, all for the probable purpose of obtaining “the next best thing”, namely, an atomic “fizzle” bomb, or “semi-fission” bomb. In
that
respect, Heisenberg’s experiments were very successful, and doubtless pointed the way to quick achievement of such a bomb. Such a bomb, moreover, placed in the warhead of a V-2, would
not
require the heavy mechanism of a cannon shooting the critical mass together, since it could be assembled by the sheer kinetic energy of the impact of the warhead on the ground, thus creating the “fizzle” explosion, one much larger than the largest conventional bombs, but one still short of the Hiroshima or Nagasaki atom bombs. Precisely just such a concept is behind German atom bomb designs from that period. The following diagram, in fact, is reproduced in Samuel Goudsmit’s book as a demonstration of the “failure” of German atom bomb physics during the war, since such a device is unlikely to have fissioned completely:
It will be noted that the bomb contained alternating layers of U235 and paraffin, which is used as a moderator to stop thermal neutrons from initiating fission in the uranium until the bomb smashed against the ground, assembling the critical mass. Note also the small sphere in the center of the device. This, like its Manhattan Bomb “Fat Man” counterpart, is an “urchin” of neutron emitting material that is smashed by the plunger, spitting out more thermal neutrons into the chain reaction. In short, this bomb is designed to “semi-fission” or “fizzle” with a colossal explosion and, more importantly, being a ground impact device, to churn up a massive cloud of deadly radioactivity. Additionally, there is the extremely slight chance that the critical mass assembly in this device, even though assymetrical, may have been fast enough to achieve full fission, though still well below the levels of efficiency as those achieved in the Little Boy bomb.
44
Q.v.. Geoffrey Brooks,
Hitler’s Vengeance Weapons: From V1 to Vimana
, pp. 45-49.
45
ULAT-1 is the name the document gives to the recovered vehicle.
46
UF6: uranium hexafluoride.
47
White Hot Intelligence Estimate, cited in
Reich of the Black Sun,
pp. 294-295. The out-of-alphabetical-sequence itemization is original to the document itself.