Read The Last Man in Russia: The Struggle to Save a Dying Nation Online
Authors: Oliver Bullough
1930s and 1940s were over: the war
was won, and the great new
industrial cities were built.
After Stalin died in 1953, most
of the gulag camps were closed.
Stalin’s
successor
Nikita
Khrushchev felt able to condemn his
methods, and tried to introduce a
more humane form of communism,
sacking incompetent and corrupt
officials,
altering
the
system,
chivvying people along rather than
murdering them.
In 1956, he gave what was called
the Secret Speech, though its
contents were known across the
country and beyond in weeks. In it,
he
criticized
Stalin’s
cult
of
personality and the great purges of
1937 and 1938. He did not admit to
all the regime’s crimes – perhaps
because he was implicated in most of
them – but it was still the first
admission that the Soviet Union had
done anything wrong, and it jolted
communists all over the country.
Some 98 of the 139 members
and candidates of the Central
Committee elected at the 1934 party
congress had been arrested and shot,
he said. And 1,108 of 1,966
delegates at that congress had been
arrested on charges of counter-
revolutionary crimes.
‘Many thousands of honest and
innocent communists died as a result
of this monstrous falsification of
such “cases”, as a result of the fact
that
all
kind
of
slanderous
“confessions” were accepted, and as
a result of the practice of forcing
accusations against oneself and
others,’ Khrushchev said, even
singling out individual judges for
censure. ‘He is a vile person, with
the brain of a bird, and morally
completely degenerate. And it was
this man who decided the fate of
prominent party workers,’ he said of
one.
He urged ordinary communists
and other Soviet citizens to believe
that the party was now back on the
right track, but the shock of finding
out even a partial truth about what
had happened caused many people
to see the country with fresh eyes.
Leonid Plyushch, for example,
was a member of a unit of the
Young Communist League, targeting
crime and prostitution. He was
rocked by the Secret Speech, almost
as much as he was when the head of
his unit raped a prostitute.
‘I was a very active member of
the Komsomol and a communist by
conviction, but when I learned of the
exposure of Stalin’s crimes it had a
tremendous impact . . . I felt the
ground had moved from under me,
and then the idea: it should never
happen again – which stayed with
me for many years.’
Khrushchev attempted to allow
such disoriented citizens to speak
out, and even permitted the reality of
the gulag to appear in print.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s novel of
an ordinary peasant in the camps,
One Day in the Life of Ivan
Denisovich
,
was
published
in
November 1962. Khrushchev was
mercurial, but this was concrete
proof that he intended to open
discussions on previously forbidden
themes.
But all of this alienated the senior
bureaucrats. They too had been
implicated in Stalin’s crimes and felt
Khrushchev was going too far.
Besides, they disliked the prospect of
being sacked and no longer feared
rebelling if they would not be killed
for it. Khrushchev had promised
communism would be built, more or
less, by 1980. But then he was
forced out in 1964, and replaced by
Leonid Brezhnev, who promised
stability. Under Brezhnev, change
stopped altogether. Communism was
postponed and replaced by the
concept of ‘developed socialism’.
The state would not wither away, as
Marx had predicted it would, for
many many years. The party was
needed to guide the revolution for
the foreseeable future, which meant
everyone got to keep their jobs. The
class of 1937 dug in on the summit
of the state. It would rule the Soviet
Union until Mikhail Gorbachev.
Young people were frustrated that
their paths to promotion were
blocked by increasingly old men.
Ogorodnikov was eager to start
down the track of his life story but
kept being derailed by the glorious
confusion of his kitchen. His wife
was trying to spoon soup into
Andrei, their three-year-old, who
had a mass of hair, no trousers and
lots to say.
Then an Uzbek man arrived to
discuss the reception centre for
homeless men he and Ogorodnikov
had set up. After a couple of minutes
of that, we switched to police
corruption. We all had anecdotes to
tell, but the Uzbek beat us flat with a
story about being randomly detained
in Astrakhan and forced to work in
the police chief’s garden for three
days until his non-existent debt to
society was deemed paid.
Lunch was soup and bread, and
Ogorodnikov recited a long grace.
He and the Uzbek then vanished to
talk business, and I made faces at
Andrei whenever he peeked around
the corner of the corridor.
At last I had Ogorodnikov to
myself: his wife went out, the Uzbek
left, and Andrei lay down for a nap.
I studied Ogorodnikov while he
made more tea. He had the long hair
and beard of an Orthodox priest but
none of their over-ripe sleekness. He
was born in 1950. He looked burned
by the sun, and hardened by it.
‘My
generation
was
the
generation of the change. You
understand,’ he started.
Growing up in the 1960s, the
post-war children, he and his friends
were part of the global wave of
protest. Like their counterparts
around the world, they were living
in unprecedented prosperity and
peace. Obviously, their wealth did
not
compare
to
that
of
contemporaries in North America or
Western Europe. There was no mass
ownership of cars for Soviet citizens,
no transistor radios or cheap fashion.
But they were still considerably
more prosperous than their parents
or grandparents had been. The
generation before them had suffered
the privations caused by World War
Two. The generation before that had
struggled through collectivization.
Ogorodnikov and his friends had
food and clothes, and could be
proud
of
their
country’s
achievements:
sputnik,
Yuri
Gagarin, the hydrogen bomb.
Ogorodnikov
grew
up
in
Chistopol, a little railway town on
the edge of Siberia, and was not
immediately a dissident. Indeed, as a
child, he had no cause to complain
about his life at all. He was far away
from the rarefied world of Moscow
intellectuals, and was a pure product
of the Soviet system. If the country
had a future it was in people like
him: bright and committed. It took
him a long time to rebel.
‘We were all raised in Soviet
ideology,’ Ogorodnikov went on. ‘I
was completely devoted to the Soviet
idea and Marxism. For me, I had the
ideals of communism. To understand
how deep this went into me, when I
was sixteen a girl wrote me a note, a
love letter, in which she chided me,
telling me that Pavka Korchagin
would not have behaved the way I
had done. And for her it was a real
example of how to live.’
Korchagin was the hero of
Nikolai Ostrovsky’s socialist realist
n o v el
How the Steel was Forged
,
which presented a glorious narrative
of the Bolshevik victory in the Civil
War. Young Russians were inspired
by his example to dream of building
the new world order just as
Westerners of the same generation
were dreaming of running away and
heading for the horizon like Jack
Kerouac. Members of the Young
Communist League signed up in
their thousands to work on massive
construction projects like the Baikal–
Amur railway line. Many young
Russians at the time would have
jumped at the kind of offer
Ogorodnikov received when he was
eighteen: to hold a senior post in a
Young
Communist
detachment
helping build a new truck factory on
a
tributary
of
the Volga
at
Naberezhnye Chelny.
Through mass education, which
reduced
illiteracy
from
near
universal to almost non-existent, the
Soviet Union succeeded in inspiring
its youth to great feats of effort.
Stalin called writers the ‘engineers of
the human soul’, and he was right.
Books like Ostrovsky’s created a
loyal army for the state, and
Ogorodnikov at the time was
completely unaware of how cleverly
he had been indoctrinated by heroes
such as Pavka Korchagin.
‘For me he was a serious realistic
life model, you understand. She was
condemning me by saying that I was
not behaving like a revolutionary
hero. This was my girlfriend, in a
love letter.’
Ogorodnikov was bright, driven
by the desire to improve his country
and rescue it from its enemies. He
joined the Pioneers – where children
paraded in red neckerchiefs and
boasted of being ‘Always Ready’
just like Boy Scouts in the West
were told to ‘Be Prepared’ – and
then the Young Communist League.
But that was not enough for him
and, aged fifteen, he and his friends
formed the Young Communists’
Militant Wing. They wanted to clean
up their rough railway town, where
too many people drank and fought
and swindled, far from Moscow’s
watchful eye.
‘We fought with non-socialist
remnants, with non-Soviet ways of
life,’ he said, mocking the Soviet
jargon. ‘There were these fops, these
dandies, and we had a lot of
authority. But don’t laugh; this was
very serious. Two of my comrades
were killed by bandits. They tried to
kill me too. We risked our lives.’
On
15
November
1968,
Komsomolskaya Pravda
, the daily
newspaper for Soviet youth, with
millions of copies printed daily,
devoted the centre of its front page
to one of those deaths. Sasha
Votyakov, the paper wrote, had
remonstrated with two ‘boorish,
arrogant, and drunken’ men who
refused to buy bus tickets. They
followed him off the bus and killed
him.
‘Imagine what
Komsomolskaya
Pravda
was, there were 60 million
copies printed every day across the
whole country, the youth paper. And
imagine, there was an article about
me on the first page with the
headline “Valour Patrol”.’
He might be from a small and
remote town, but this was enough to
qualify him as a high-flyer. In the
late 1960s, he was already living the
communist dream, creating his own
legend. He was defending the
revolution. Once he beat up a friend
who had had sex with a female
classmate in the Pioneers’ room.
They were welcome to have sex of
course, that was their business, but
they should never have used the
Pioneers’ banner as a sheet. They
had fucked on the flag, and needed
to be taught a lesson.
Another time, some locals were
out in the middle of town in winter.
It was cold and they were warming
their feet on the eternal flame, which
burned to commemorate those who
had died defending the Soviet