Read Financial Markets Operations Management Online
Authors: Keith Dickinson
It is usually the case that if an investor (or its agent) wishes to invest in foreign securities, it is not possible to directly access the relevant CSD. There are two options available to the investor/agent:
We will look at Option 1 in Chapter 10: Custody and the Custodians. With Option 2, the link between the local CSD and the foreign CSD enables securities held in the latter to become available in the records of the former.
The local CSD (also referred to as the investor CSD) becomes a customer or participant of the foreign CSD (the issuer CSD). This would be regarded as a unilateral link. If there was a reciprocal arrangement (i.e. the issuer CSD became an investor CSD for its local investors with the original investor CSD becoming an issuer CSD), this would be a bilateral link (see
Figure 6.5
). In either event, both bilateral and unilateral links are regarded as
direct links
.
Table 6.7
shows some examples of direct links.
TABLE 6.7
Direct links
Type of Link | CSDs | Countries |
Bilateral |
| Malta/Germany |
Bilateral |
| Italy/Spain |
Bilateral |
| Luxembourg/Luxembourg |
Unilateral |
| Italy/Spain |
Unilateral |
| Greece/Germany |
Unilateral |
| Luxembourg/Slovakia |
Source:
European Central Bank (online) “Eligible Links as at 20 Dec 2013”. Available from
www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/coll/coll/ssslinks/html/index.en.html
. [Accessed Monday, 10 February 2014]
There is a fourth variation, known as
relayed links
, whereby two CSDs are linked using a third as an intermediary CSD (see
Figure 6.6
).
Examples of relayed links include the following:
6
6
These links would allow securities to be delivered on a free of payment (FoP) and/or a delivery/receive against payment (DVP/RVP) basis.
Euroclear Bank and Clearstream Banking Luxembourg, the two international CSDs, are regarded as fully interoperable with their use of the bridge (see the next section).
In Section 6.2 of this chapter, we gave a brief overview of the events that led to the creation of the two international central securities depositories (ICSDs). The formation of Euroclear and Cedel occurred against the background of the issuance of physical Eurobond certificates and the problems associated with the delivery of the certificates to the various European centres where the underwriters, dealers and investors were located.
Morgan Guaranty's Brussels office was used to host the issuers' closing ceremonies that included the handing over of the new bonds to the lead underwriter. It was decided to launch a system whereby the physical certificates were replaced by a book-entry system and where receipts and deliveries against payment could occur once participants had opened securities accounts and cash accounts with the system. That system became Euroclear and it was founded in December 1968.
Whilst bond closings took place in Brussels, most Eurobonds were listed in Luxembourg. Luxembourg was also experiencing operational logjams in New York. Luxembourg-based banks, both local and foreign, decided to investigate the establishment of a rival system to Euroclear. By September 1970, the Centrale de Livraison de Valeurs Mobilières, better known as Cedel, was launched by 71 banks from 11 countries with the motto: “By the market, for the market”.
So we can see that in a very short period of time, one particular product type with no national domicile, the Eurobond, could be held and processed out of two systems, both based in continental Europe. The history of these two organisations makes for interesting reading and their fierce competitiveness over the years has been good for the industry across a wide range of areas, including:
The ICSDs are similar to the basic concept of a CSD but differ in one important respect: Euroclear and Clearstream are banks and this enables them to offer credit and certain other banking activities related to security settlement.
It can be argued that the ICSDs are as much a part of the post-trade market infrastructure as the CSDs except that the ICSDs are commercial in nature; in other words, they not only look after their customers but also their shareholders.
Whilst both ICSDs are similar to a clearing house and CSD combination, it should be noted that the ICSDs do not act as central counterparties. Their services cover the entire spectrum from new issuance to redemption.
CBL settles a wide range of securities including:
CBL offers a full range of services from advice to primary distribution using its Global Issuer Hub:
CBL has three types of settlement:
Transactions can be settled on either a DVP/RVP or free of payment (FoP) basis.
CBL processes income and corporate actions activities together with reports that include income pre-advices, corporate action notifications and market claims.
CBL provides a full range of securities financing services through its Global Liquidity Hub, including:
CBL's Vestima Funds Hub provides the link between investor, fund distributor, transfer agent and trading platform. The Vestima Funds Hub enables:
We have seen in the previous section that there are direct links between the ICSDs and a selection of local CSDs. These links can either be unilateral or bilateral in nature.
Participants can input instructions, access information, manage corporate action activities, send queries and handle exceptions using one or more connectivity products offered under the CreationConnect service. The three products are:
In September 2013, CBL launched ClearstreamXact, an Internet-based system that initially offers participants access to CBL's collateral management service. (Settlement and asset management are planned additional services.)
EB processes a wide range of securities including:
EB helps issuers, lead managers and issuing agents by:
EB, as with CBL above, has three types of settlement:
Transactions can be settled on either a DVP/RVP or free of payment (FoP) basis.
These services include:
This includes collateral management and securities lending and borrowing.
Money transfer facilities include:
EB provides credit facilities to enable participants to manage their operations, especially settlements, borrowing and money transfer. Credit facilities are provided on a secured basis.
EB's investment fund platform is FundSettlement International, which provides a single access point for fund management companies, fund distributors and transfer agents. Users have access to:
We have seen in the previous section that there are direct links between the ICSDs and a selection of local CSDs. These links can either be unilateral or bilateral in nature.
Participants can access Euroclear through the following Internet Protocol-based networks:
Applications are either screen-based or computer-to-computer â see
Table 6.8
.
TABLE 6.8
Screen-based or computer-to-computer connectivity
Screen-Based | Computer-to-Computer |
EUCLID PC â settlement instruction/validation plus reporting | EUCLID server |
FundSettle â access to FundSettle International service | EUCLID file transfer |
Triweb and Biweb â collateral management reporting | FundSettle file transfer |
SWIFT |
Instructions can also be submitted by tested telex, post and, exceptionally, fax (with telephone call-back).