Authors: Aaron Johnson
shine everywhere—is the distinctly
Western
mystic tradi-
Virtually all the computer manufacturing firms in Silicon Valley (the
peninsula south of San Francisco) have flex-time. The employees
choose their own working hours.
Il8 Prometheus Rising
tion and does not appear in Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism or any
Eastern religion.
Thomas Jefferson developed his view that "all men are created
equal" from the perception of the infinity within each of us,
which he learned from the Scottish philosophers, Reid and
Hutcheson. (It was also from Hutcheson that Jefferson got his
idea of "unalienable rights," which Congress in the interest of
stylistic elegance altered to "inalienable rights.") The Scottish
Enlightenment, like the French and English Enlightenment, was
the beginning of the materialization and manifestation of the
Judeo-Christian vision of the Heavenly City.
It was also this 18th Century Illuminati circle which introduced
the concept
of progress—
the conscious formulation of the
symbolism of Prometheus. This vision has been under so much
attack in recent decades that to defend it at all will seem archaic
and eccentric to many readers.
Nonetheless,
evolution is real:
quantum jumps do occur
throughout the biosphere and throughout human intellectual
history. We are riding a mounting tidal wave of rising consciousness
and expanding intelligence which is accelerating whether
we like it or not.
By and large, most people—and especially most ruling
elites—have not liked this acceleration factor. The migration of
capital (i.e.,
ideas)
Westward has been largely a flight from
oppression, an escapist movement—as critics today describe
Space as "escapist." Everywhere, everywhen, the rulers of society
have tried to put a brake on the third circuit, to
decelerate
the
acceleration function, to establish limits on what was printable,
discussable, even thinkable.
The Greek myth of Prometheus Bound—the Titan who
brought Light to humanity and is eternally punished for it—is the
synecdoche, the perfect symbol, of how the third circuit has been
handled in most human societies.
The peculiar way most societies have imprinted the fourth,
socio-sexual circuit—the weird taboos which restrain us all, in
every tribe, however technologically "advanced"—is part of the
acceleration-deceleration dialectic.
Prometheus Rising
The fourth circuit has been largely imprinted to serve as a
brake, holding back the free activity of the time-binding semantic
circuit.
This is the historical function of taboos and "morality."
EXERCIZES
1 . Compare Greece in the 4th Century BC, Rome in the First
Century AD, Southern Europe at the beginning of the Renaissance,
England c. 1600-1900, New York c. 1900-1950, and California
today. Note the accumulation of wealth corresponding to
the accumulation of heresies, innovations, cults, kooks, pioneers,
inventors etc.
2. Imagine you put a penny on the first square of a chessboard,
two cents on the second square, four cents on the third,
etc. How much will you have to put on the sixty-fourth square'?
This is how time-binding works, in relatively Open Societies.
3. Read the denunciations of Galileo by the orthodox of his
time.
4. Read the denunciations of Beethoven, of Picasso, of Joyce
by those who knew in advance what music, painting and novels
should be.
5. Are the most important scientific ideas of 1997 going to be
published in
Scientific American
in 1997, or in 2017?
6. Research how many years passed between the publication
of Einstein's paper on Special Relativity and the acceptance of
the idea by the majority of physicists.
CHAPTER EIGHT
THE "MORAL" SOCIOSEXUAL
CIRCUIT
As the caterpillar chooses the fairest leaves to lay her eggs on, so
the priest lays his curse on the fairest joys.
— William Blake,
Marriage of Heaven & Hell
121
The socio-sexual circuit is activated and imprinted at adolescence,
when the DNA signal awakens the sexual apparatus. The
teenager becomes the bewildered possessor of a new body and a
new neural circuit oriented to orgasm and sperm-egg fusion. The
pubescent human, like any other rutting animal, lurches about in
a state of mating frenzy, every call gasping for the sexual object.
Imprint vulnerability is acute, and the first sexual signals to
turn on the adolescent nervous system remain fixed for life and
forever define the individual's sexual reality.
We should not be surprised, therefore, at the various fetishes
that are so easily acquired at these sensitive moments.
In fact, we can tell precisely at what period in time a person
was sexually imprinted by noting which fetishes continue to turn
him or her on.
Black garters, booze, cool jazz,
and
crew cuts
define the sexual signals of one imprint group (generation) just
as rigidly as
sleeping hags, marijuana, heavy rock
and
tight
jeans
define another.
As Masters and Johnson have pointed out, most sexual dysfunctions
are hooked into the nervous system at these adolescent
moments of acute imprint vulnerability; their archetypal case is
that of a male who, about to mate for the first time, in the back
seat of a car, was traumatized by a policeman flashing a light on
him and his paramour. The imprint of that ghastly moment was
hooked for decades: the male remained impotent until reimprinted
by Masters and Johnson in their clinic.
The choices of heterosexuality or homosexuality, brash promiscuity
or timid celibacy, etc. are usually imprinted by exactly
similar accidents at points of imprint vulnerability. Just as biosurvival
anxiety or security are imprinted by accidents in the
nursing period, emotional domination or submission by accidents
in the toddling period, symbolic dexterity or "stupidity" by
the accidents of the learning environment.
Primitives (so-called) know these facts and surround all the
points of imprint vulnerability with rituals, "ordeals," "rites of
passage," etc. well designed to imprint the desired traits of a
well-integrated member of that tribe at that time. Relics of these
imprint ceremonies survive in Baptism, Confirmation, Bar Mitzvahs,
Marriage Ceremonies, the Masonic "raising," etc.
723
124 Prometheus Rising
It is important to realize that chance, genetics and malice
(anger) are among the "accidents" that create imprints at the
points of vulnerability.
Most humans do not, due to accidents of this sort, imprint
exactly the socio-sexual role demanded by their society. The
fourth circuit can almost be called the
guilt circuit:
almost everybody,
almost everywhere, is quite busy hiding their real sexual
profile and miming the "accepted" sex role for their gender in
their tribe.
In ordinary language, the imprint on the socio-sexual circuit is
generally called "the mature personality" or the "sexual role." It
is "the Parent" in the jargon of Transactional Analysis.
It is amusing to note that Freud recognized the first circuit as
the oral stage, the second as the anal stage and the fourth as the
genital stage. He did not notice the third, semantic circuit—
perhaps because as an obsessive Rationalist he was so absorbed
in verbal and conceptual programs that they were invisible to
him, as water may be to fishes. Similarly, Jung described the first
circuit as the
sensational
faculty, the second as the
feeling
faculty, the third as the
rational
faculty—and skipped the sociosexual
circuit entirely. (There may be a clue here as to why Jung
could not abide Freud's fourth-circuit emphasis and built a
separate, less sexual psychology of his own.) Jung then went on
to lump all the higher circuits under the rubric of the faculty of
intuition.
It is the function of the nervous system to focus, to select, to
narrow down; to choose, from an infinity of possibilities, the
biochemical imprints which determine the tactics and strategies
that ensure survival in
one
place, status in
one
tribe.
The infant is genetically prepared to learn
any
language,
master
any
skill, play
any
sex role; in a very short time, however,
he or she becomes mechanically, robotically, fixated to accept,
follow and mimic the limited offerings of his social and cultural
environment.
In this process, each of us pays a
heavy price.
Survival and
status mean forfeiting the infinite possibilities of unconditioned
consciousness. The domesticated primate, inside the social reality-
tunnel, is a trivial fragment of the potentials for experience
Prometheus Rising 125
and intelligence innate in the 110,000000,000-cell human biocomputer.
As Robert A. Heinlein wrote:
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an
invasion, butcher a hog, design a building, conn a ship, write a
sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the
dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve an
equation, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a
computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects.
But as long as we remain on the antique circuits we are not
very different from the insects. That is, just as the insects repeat
their four-stage program (egg, larvae, chrysalis, adult) from
generation to generation, we repeat our four-stage cycle also.
The antique circuits are genetically conservative. They ensure
the survival and continuation of the species, but do no more. For
future evolution we must look to the futuristic circuits.
SPECIALIZATION
IS FOR INSECTS
126 Prometheus Rising
It is sometime mistakenly stated that there are no universal
sexual taboos. This is not true. There is one omni-purpose taboo
which exists in every tribe.
That taboo stipulates that sexuality shall
not
be unregulated
by the tribe. That is, even though no other taboos are universal,
the taboo against living without taboos remains constant. Every
tribe has its own set of
verbots
and thou-shalt-nots, but no tribe
allows the individual to choose his or her own set.
An American President may not marry his own sister (if he
wants to get re-elected); an Egyptian Pharaoh
had to
marry his
own sister. Confronted by this moral relativism, many social
scientists have failed to notice the invariable: both the President
and the Pharaoh are expected to obey
local
rules. So are the
Samoan, the Russian, the Eskimo and the Cuban.
Why is there this taboo against sexual self-definition and selfactualization?
Why is it that, while no two societies can agree on
what is sexually "good" and sexually "bad," every society thinks
that it must make some definition?
1
The Gurdjieff titles are deliberately negative, since he was trying to
get people off these primitive circuits and into the futuristic circuits.
Prometheus Rising I2J
The answer is that our first humanoid (symbolizing and conceptualizing)
ancestors were very ignorant, but not at all stupid.
They were ignorant of the laws of genetics, but they were smart
enough to suspect that such laws exist. Sperm-egg fusion is surrounded
by violent taboos and fierce tribal conformity because
the survival and future evolution of the gene pool depends upon
which
particular spermatozoa reaches
which
particular ovum.
Etymologists confirm the Freudian theory that there are
ancient linkages between the words for the sacred, the erotic, the
obscene, the awe inspiring, the awe-ful, the divine, the
"thrilling." All of these are primitive, powerful
physiological
responses to the mysteries of
sexual attraction, mating, reproduction,
inheritance, genetic drift, future evolution.
The earliest
god-forms found by archeologists are pregnant goddesses and
ithyphallic gods. The most intolerant, bigoted and recalcitrant of
all prejudices—the very last to fade away after cosmopolitanizing