Read Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect Online

Authors: Matthew D. Lieberman

Tags: #Psychology, #Social Psychology, #Science, #Life Sciences, #Neuroscience, #Neuropsychology

Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect (49 page)

BOOK: Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect
13.74Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

126

we found that performance on a social working memory task
Dumontheil, I., Jensen, S. G., Wood, N. W., Meyer, M. L., Lieberman, M. D., & Blakemore, S. (under review). Influence of dopamine regulating genes on social working memory.

127

There is a big difference between having the capacity
Berkman, E., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Using neuroscience to broaden emotion regulation: Theoretical and methodological considerations.
Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3
, 475–493.

127

We often use our own mind as a proxy
Griffin, D. W., & Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24
, 319–359.

127

created an elegant paradigm called the
director’s task
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension.
Psychological Science, 11
(1), 32–38.

128

What should you do when your partner tells you
Dumontheil, I., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S. J. (2010). Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence.
Developmental Science, 13
(2), 331–338.

Chapter 6: Mirror, Mirror

132

Some neurons responded to the sight of an object
Rizzolatti, G., Gentilucci, M., Camarda, R. M., Gallese, V., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Fogassi, L. (1990). Neurons related to reaching-grasping arm movements in the rostral part of area 6 (area 6aβ).
Experimental Brain Research, 82
(2), 337–350.

132

changed our fundamental understanding of how we came to be such social creatures
Pellegrino, G. D., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study.
Experimental Brain Research, 91
(1), 176–180.

133

Although some psychologists had argued for this kind of perceptual-motor
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning.
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9
(2), 129–154.

133

that hitherto remained mysterious and inaccessible to experiments”
Ramachandran, V. S. (2000). Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution.
Edge
website article:
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran/ramachandran_p1.html
.

133

our capacity for language, culture, imitation, mindreading, and empathy
Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28
(02), 105–124; Molenberghs, P., Cunnington, R., & Mattingley, J. B. (2009). Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33
(7), 975–980; Blakeslee, S. (2006). Cells that read minds.
New York Times
, January 10, p. 1; Fabrega Jr., H. (2005). Biological evolution of cognition and culture: Off Arbib’s mirror-neuron system stage?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28
(02), 131–132; Gallese, V. (2001). The shared manifold hypothesis. From mirror neurons to empathy.
Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8
(5-7), 33–50.

134

allowing us to keep more abstract ideas in mind at the same time
Coolidge, F. L., & Wynn, T. (2005). Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 15
(1), 5–26.

134

force behind the ‘great leap forward’ in human evolution”
Ramachandran, V. S. (2000). Mirror neurons and imitation learning as the driving force behind “the great leap forward” in human evolution.
Edge
website article:
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran/ramachandran_p1.html
.

135

first evidence regarding the presence of a mirror neuron system in humans
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.
Science, 286
(5449), 2526–2528.

136

temporarily “frazzles” the neurons in that area such that the region is essentially taken offline
Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J., & Mazziotta, J. C. (2003). The essential role of Broca’s area in imitation.
European Journal of Neuroscience, 17
(5), 1123–1128.

136

imitating the fingering required to make a set of guitar chords that they were shown
Buccino, G., Vogt, S., Ritzl, A., Fink, G. R., Zilles, K., Freund, H. J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study.
Neuron, 42
(2), 323–334.

138

Gordon’s account of the second route
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13
(3), 279–301; Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87
(3), 340.

138

mirror neurons are the neural implementation of Simulation theory
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2
(12), 493–501.

138

“the fundamental mechanism that allows us a direct experiential grasp
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8
(9), 396–403; Gordon actually foreshadowed this idea two decades earlier writing that an “interesting possibility for … practical simulation is a prepackaged ‘module’ called upon automatically in the perception of other human beings”: Gordon, R. M. (2007). Folk psychology as simulation.
Mind & Language, 1
(2), 158–171.

139

My brain is mirroring your brain
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations.
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11
(4), 264–274.

140

found mirror neurons that fit the bill
Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilta, M. A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: Action representation in mirror neurons.
Science, 297
(5582), 846–848.

140

highlighted an important limitation of the sight-sound study
Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21
(7), 1229–1243.

141

that the mirror neurons respond to actions that involve objects that cannot be seen
Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study.
Neuron, 31
(1), 155–166.

141

Humans are certainly capable of seeing an object
Lee, H., Simpson, G. V., Logothetis, N. K., & Rainer, G. (2005). Phase locking of single neuron activity to theta oscillations during working memory in monkey extrastriate visual cortex.
Neuron, 45
(1), 147–156.

141

She suggests that the purpose of mirror neurons
Heyes, C. (2010). Mesmerising mirror neurons.
NeuroImage, 51
(2), 789–791.

142

Heyes designed a clever
countermirroring
procedure
Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C. (2007). Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system.
Current Biology, 17
(17), 1527–1531; Catmur, C., Mars, R. B., Rushworth, M. F., & Heyes, C. (2011). Making mirrors: Premotor cortex stimulation enhances mirror and counter-mirror motor facilitation.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23
(9), 2352–2362.

142

Another study examined how the mirror system responds
Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action.
Nature Neuroscience, 10
(7), 817–818.

144

If we look at brains at rest
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102
(27), 9673–9678.

144

If he answers, “In order to have a drink”
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (in press). Automaticity, control, and the social brain. In J. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.).
Dual Process Theories of the Social Mind.
New York: Guilford.

145

systematically investigated these distinctions
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Psychological Review, 94
(1), 3.

145

are more likely to focus on the thoughts they are trying to convey
Carver, C. S. (1979). A cybernetic model of self-attention processes.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
(8), 1251.

146

explain another person’s high-level reasons for wanting the light on
Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: A critique.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9
(1).

147

figuring out the how, what, and why of other people’s behavior
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding.
Journal of Neuroscience, 32
, 3575–3583; Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior.
NeuroImage, 59
, 3050–3059; Spunt, R. P., Falk, E. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Dissociable neural systems support retrieval of “how” and “why” action knowledge.
Psychological Science, 21
, 1593–1598; Spunt, R. P., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: An fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23
, 63–74; Brass, M., Schmitt, R. M., Spengler, S., & Gergely, G. (2007). Investigating action understanding: Inferential processes versus action simulation.
Current Biology, 17
(24), 2117–2121; de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Complementary systems for understanding action intentions.
Current Biology, 18
(6), 454–457; Noordzij, M. L., Newman-Norlund, S. E., De Ruiter, J. P., Hagoort, P., Levinson, S. C., & Toni, I. (2009). Brain mechanisms underlying human communication.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3
, 14.

148

there was increased mirror system activity
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding.
Journal of Neuroscience, 32
, 3575–3583.

148

this was still the case when participants were distracted
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2013). The busy social brain: Evidence for automaticity and control in the neural systems supporting social cognition and action understanding.
Psychological Science, 24
, 80–86.

149

“blooming, buzzing confusion”
James, W. (1890/1950).
The Principles of Psychology.
New York: Dover, p. 462.

Chapter 7: Peaks and Valleys

152

The word
empathy
was introduced into the English language
Titchener, E. B. (1909).
Lectures on the Experimental Psychology of Thought-Processes.
New York: Macmillan.

152

something like a first-person experience from the object’s perspective
The modern use of the term to refer to appreciating another person’s experience can be traced to Husserl’s
Ideen
and his student Edith Stein’s dissertation published as Stein, E. (1989/1916).
On the Problem of Empathy.
Washington D.C.: ICS Publications.

152

There are at least three kinds of psychological processes
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise.
Nature Neuroscience, 15
, 675-680.

153

individuals watched others receive shocks to their hands or feet
Avenanti, A., Bueti, D., Galati, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005). Transcranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain.
Nature Neuroscience, 8
(7), 955–960.

153

muscles in our own faces immediately mimic the expression in subtle ways
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Elmehed, K. (2000). Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions.
Psychological Science, 11
(1), 86–89.

153

if a person is unable to mimic those facial expressions
Neal, D. T., & Chartrand, T. L. (2011). Embodied emotion perception amplifying and dampening facial feedback modulates emotion perception accuracy.
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2
(6), 673–678.

153

Given that the mirror system is involved in understanding
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J. P., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2003). Both of us disgusted in
my
insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust.
Neuron, 40
(3), 655–664; Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100
(9), 5497–5502.

154

trying to understand why someone is experiencing a particular emotion
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2012). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior.
NeuroImage, 59
, 3050–3059; Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension.
Annual Review of Psychology, 62
, 103–134; Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain.
Science, 303
(5661), 1157–1162.

156

affect matching can sometimes lead to avoidance behavior
Batson, C. D. (1991).
The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

156

empathy occurs only when there is an appropriate emotional response
Ibid.

156

Given that nearly all of the follow-ups to Singer’s seminal work have focused on empathy
Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., de Greck, M., & Northoff, G. (2011). Is there a core neural network in empathy? An fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35
(3), 903–911.

156

almost none of the studies that have been done have linked neural responses
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping.
Neuron, 68
(1), 149–160.

156

Sylvia Morelli, Lian Rameson, and I ran an fMRI study
Morelli, S. A., Rameson, L. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (in press). The neural components of empathy: Predicting daily prosocial behavior.
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.

158

the hot area of study in the next ten years
Cf. Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Bramati, I. E., Krueger, F., Tura, B., … , & Grafman, J. (2011). Impairment of prosocial sentiments is associated with frontopolar and septal damage in frontotemporal dementia.
NeuroImage, 54
(2), 1735–1742; Krueger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., … , & Grafman, J. (2007). Neural correlates of trust.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104
(50), 20084–20089; Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 74
, 3–7.

158

the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC)—the CEO of the brain’s mentalizing system
Andy, O. J., & Stephan, H. (1966). Septal nuclei in primate phylogeny: A quantitative investigation.
Journal of Comparative Neurology, 126
(2), 157–170; Sesack, S. R., Deutch, A. Y., Roth, R. H., & Bunney, B. S. (1989). Topographical organization of the efferent projections of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: An anterograde tract-tracing study with
Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 290
(2), 213–242.

159

When a rat pressed the lever
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47
(6), 419.

159

Two decades later a similar study was conducted
Heath, R. G. (1972). Pleasure and brain activity in man.
Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 154
(363), 9.

159

At the same time that researchers were linking the septal area to reward
Brady, J. V., & Nauta, W. J. (1953). Subcortical mechanisms in emotional behavior: Affective changes following septal forebrain lesions in the albino rat.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46
(5), 339.

159

Lesion studies in rats, mice, and rabbits suggest
Carlson, N. R., & Thomas, G. J. (1968). Maternal behavior of mice with limbic lesions.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66
(3p1), 731; Cruz, M. L., & Beyer, C. (1972). Effects of septal lesions on maternal behavior and lactation in the rabbit.
Physiology & Behavior, 9
(3), 361–365; Slotnick, B. M., & Nigrosh, B. J. (1975). Maternal behavior of mice with cingulate cortical, amygdala, or septal lesions.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 88
(1), 118.

160

one way to reconcile the findings is to characterize the septal area as shifting the balance
Inagaki, T. K., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Neural correlates of giving support to a loved one.
Psychosomatic Medicine, 74
, 3–7.

160

The septal area is rich in oxytocin receptors
Insel, T. R., Gelhard, R., & Shapiro, L. E. (1991). The comparative distribution of forebrain receptors for neurohypophyseal peptides in monogamous and polygamous mice.
Neuroscience, 43
(2), 623–630.

160

Among rodents, pups who receive more parental care
Lukas, M., Bredewold, R., Neumann, I. D., & Veenema, A. H. (2010). Maternal separation interferes with developmental changes in brain vasopressin and oxytocin receptor binding in male rats.
Neuropharmacology, 58
(1), 78–87; Francis, D. D., Champagne, F. C., & Meaney, M. J. (2001). Variations in maternal behaviour are associated with differences in oxytocin receptor levels in the rat.
Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 12
(12), 1145–1148.

162

Just two years after the first Sally-Anne test for Theory of Mind
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?
Cognition, 21
(1), 37–46.

163

Subsequent studies have demonstrated other mentalizing deficits
Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29
, 407–418; White, S. J., Hill, E. L., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the Strange Stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism.
Child Development, 80
, 1097–1117.

163

Autistic individuals are also much less likely to describe
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior.
American Journal of Psychology, 57
, 243–259; Klin, A. (2003). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The social attribution task.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41
(7), 831–846.

165

The Sally-Anne test isn’t the only or the hardest test of Theory of Mind
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind.”
Cognition, 50
(1), 115–132.

165

Uta Frith gave a group of autistic children
Shah, A., & Frith, U. (1983). An islet of ability in autistic children: A research note.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24
(4), 613–620.

166

Autism is associated with a deficit in focusing on high-level meaning
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind.”
Cognition, 50
(1), 115–132.

166

the two deficits do not always go hand in hand in autism
Ibid.; Spunt, R. P., Meyer, M. L., & Lieberman, M. D. (under review). Social by default: Brain activity at rest facilitates social cognition; cf. Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156
(1), 68–80.

167

Multiple studies have shown that training can lead to sizable gains
Hadwin, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Howlin, P., & Hill, K. (1997). Does teaching theory of mind have an effect on the ability to develop conversation in children with autism?
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27
(5), 519–537; Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1995). Teaching theory of mind: A new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25
(4), 415–433.

168

We know this because children who are born deaf
Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (1999). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind.
Journal
of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36
(3), 459–474; Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (1999). Representing inner worlds: Theory of mind in autistic, deaf, and normal hearing children.
Psychological Science, 10
(2), 126–129; Peterson, C. C., & Siegal, M. (2002). Insights into theory of mind from deafness and autism.
Mind & Language, 15
(1), 123–145.

168

During the second year, these children tend to ignore others
Adrien, J. L., Lenoir, P., Martineau, J., Perrot, A., Hameury, L., Larmande, C., & Sauvage, D. (1993). Blind ratings of early symptoms of autism based upon family home movies.
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32
(3), 617–626; Klin, A., Volkmar, F. R., & Sparrow, S. S. (1992). Autistic social dysfunction: Some limitations of the theory of mind hypothesis.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33
(5), 861–876.

169

experimenters have asked children to imitate various behaviors and hand gestures
DeMyer, M. K., Alpern, G. D., Barton, S., DeMyer, W. E., Churchill, D. W., Hingtgen, J. N., … , & Kimberlin, C. (1972). Imitation in autistic, early schizophrenic, and non-psychotic subnormal children.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2
(3), 264–287.

169

Children diagnosed with autism consistently perform worse
Williams, J. H., Whiten, A., & Singh, T. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder.
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34
(3), 285–299.

169

Once the mirror system was clearly linked with imitation
Nishitani, N., Avikainen, S., & Hari, R. (2004). Abnormal imitation-related cortical activation sequences in Asperger’s syndrome.
Annals of Neurology, 55
(4), 558–562; Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Altshuler, E. L., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders.
Cognitive Brain Research, 24
, 190–198; Dapretto, M., Davies, M. S., Pfeifer, J. H., Scott, A. A., Sigman, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Iacoboni, M. (2005). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders.
Nature Neuroscience, 9
(1), 28–30; Williams, J. H., Waiter, G. D., Gilchrist, A., Perrett, D. I., Murray, A. D., & Whiten, A. (2006). Neural mechanisms of imitation and mirror neuron functioning in autistic spectrum disorder.
Neuropsychologia, 44
(4), 610–621; Ramachandran, V. S., & Oberman, L. M. (2006). Broken mirrors: A theory of autism.
Scientific American, 16
, 62–69; Gallese, V. (2006). Intentional attunement: A neurophysiological perspective on social cognition and its disruption in autism.
Brain Research, 1079
(1), 15–24.

BOOK: Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect
13.74Mb size Format: txt, pdf, ePub
ads

Other books

Landing Gear by Kate Pullinger
Shootout of the Mountain Man by William W. Johnstone, J. A. Johnstone
Secret Santa (novella) by Rhian Cahill
Only One for Me by Candace Shaw
Election by Tom Perrotta
Tara's Gold by Lisa Harris